The Virginian-Pilot
©
Great. Another gimmick in education, I thought. Another dopey plan to pay people to do what they ought to be doing anyway.
That was my gut reaction when I spied the huge, honking headline splashed across the top of Monday's Pilot:
"Make the grade, get $100."
It was accompanied by an illustration that featured a supersize Ben Franklin dangling from a fishhook.
Oh, yeah, and in smaller print there was this: "Two Beach schools are part of a program that pays students and teachers for successful tests."
Yet when I stopped hyperventilating and actually read reporter Mike Hixenbaugh's entire story, I was heartened to learn about a creative academic program that seems destined to work.
Best of all, it rests on the purely capitalist assumption that excellence ought to be rewarded - in cash, whenever possible - without bankrupting the public.
In this case, the taxpayers provide good schools. The private sector pitches in to make them even better.
That's the definition of a public-private partnership, as opposed to those developer-welfare programs that city managers around here are always pushing.
Here's how it works: A mostly private foundation - and we'll deal with the "mostly" in a moment - that aims to improve America's standing in science and math achievement, is working in two Virginia Beach high schools to boost enrollment in Advanced Placement classes.
The schools were selected because they have a high percentage of military dependents. (And also because one of the principals discovered the program and asked if his students could take part.)
We all know military families move around. As a result, their children can find themselves in good schools and bad ones. If these students can enroll in demanding Advanced Placement courses, it increases the likelihood that they'll receive excellent instruction, no matter where they are.
It’s all part of the Initiative for Military Families, part of the broader National Math and Science Initiative, funded by philanthropists and public-spirited corporations concerned because several years ago, American high school students ranked 25th in the world in math and 17th in science.
Alarming, no?
Instead of moaning about the abysmal scores and demanding that hardworking taxpayers cough up even more dough for schools, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and a number of corporations, such as ExxonMobil, Boeing and Lockheed Martin, pooled their resources to push Advanced Placement classes and - more importantly - successful scores on the AP exams.
Teachers in selected schools receive intensive training, the schools get state-of-the-art science equipment, and the kids who enroll in AP courses get their $87 test fee paid for by the private sector. Best of all, students who score a 3, 4 or 5 on the exams get a bonus of $100. These benefits go to all students, by the way, not just those from underprivileged homes or military dependents.
The organizers try to downplay the cash-for-passing aspect, saying it's a small part of a much more ambitious project.
"Remember, the students have to work for nine months to earn that money," said Rena Pederson, spokeswoman for the Dallas-based National Math and Science Initiative.
The first two high schools in South Hampton Roads to be included are Salem and Green Run. Expect more to follow.
Wait, I promised to address the "mostly" part of the funding formula, didn't I?
Pederson told me that about 97 percent of the funds come from private sources. The remaining 3 percent comes from grant money, often through state and federal agencies such as the National Science Foundation.
There are purists who would denounce the use of any taxpayer dollars - no matter how few - to throw cash at high-performing kids.
I'm not one of them.
Fact is, to remain competitive, American students need to excel at math and science.
If corporations and philanthropists want to toss in a little lesson in capitalism along with the push for academics, well, that's perfect.
Kerry Dougherty, (757) 446-2306, kerry.dougherty@cox.net

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
re. AP pay off
Get paid a hundred dollars to pass an AP exam? It's a bad idea to pay kids to pass a test. Good grief.
A rare occasion.
Today I agree with the editorial and disagree with Kerry. Yikes! I believe it's important to instill the ethic of "doing your best" whether there is a financial reward in place or not. In our daily work, sometimes there is a financial payoff for going the extra mile and sometimes there is not. But, there is always (in my way of thinking) a payoff in peace of mind--knowing I did my best or went the extra mile. That's something money can't buy. And, in spite of repeated requests from her, my daughter does not get paid for good grades. We expect her to do her best. I want to create in her a love of learning--not a love of making the grade (two very different things).
to quote austin powers:
"Yea Capitalism!"
Anyone who doesn't like the idea, I'm guessing would rather the kids not do well in school and be rewarded for THAT. (ie. welfare)
or maybe they just think a free education is payment enough
Our tax dollars pay for the buildings, utilities, salaries, supplies, etc. for a free education, something billions on this planet don't get. The opportunity to get into college with good grades, and getting college credit for passing these classes with good grades, which saves them tuition. Hmmm, maybe some people just think that is motivation enough without throwing cash into it to make a next generation of "what's in it for me" thinkers.
Different spin
I'm still not sure if I agree with the $100 for passing these tests, but here's something to consider: Why do students go to college and get degrees? Most will say to get better paying jobs, meaning they expect monetary reward for passing college exams. So what's the difference?
You mean the Greedy, self-serving, elitist America?
Balderdash! It's about as American as Warren Buffet paying less taxes than his secretary.
If these kids aren't motivated by the fact they get college credit,
(grad w/less debt), then they don't deserve additional motivation.
What about the kids in my classes who can't read & are piled into classrooms of 25 or more kids? Think they'll ever win a spot in an AP class & qualify for a $100? Or the kid who was referred for Sp Ed help in the 1st grade but the VBCPS didn't have the money for placement? Or the kid who was referred in K but was "too young?" Think AP is in their future?
That money is needed..no doubt...but what about using it as an incentive for h. s. graduation? Or to help those who need help? Now that is the American Way.
A Little Knowledge can be a good thing.....
At-Risk means there are a certain % of kids on free and reduced lunch and this puts them "at-risk" for school success. It doesn't mean all kids are special ed and receive services. Most of my kids come to school in dirty clothes, often too big with holes. There are average kids at this school and identified "gifted." But most of these kids do not have the same life-benefits as kids at John B Dey.
AP classes are usually small, often 10/12 kids. My K, 1st, 2nd grade classes have 25 kids in them. You think that might put some of these kids at risk...especially those who are not ready for school? Think a little more money decreasing class sizes might help rather than spending on kids who are already focused?
A Little Knowledge can be a good thing.....
At-Risk means there are a certain % of kids on free and reduced lunch and this puts them "at-risk" for school success. It doesn't mean all kids are special ed and receive services. Most of my kids come to school in dirty clothes, often too big with holes. There are average kids at this school and identified "gifted." But most of these kids do not have the same life-benefits as kids at John B Dey.
AP classes are usually small, often 10/12 kids. My K, 1st, 2nd grade classes have 25 kids in them. You think that might put some of these kids at risk...especially those who are not ready for school? Think a little more money decreasing class sizes might help rather than spending on kids who are already focused?
757 they place young minds in your hands?
"You mean the Greedy, self-serving, elitist America?"
...if you are a teacher and have this attitude ...then there is part of the problem....there are lots of programs for needy kids...and I fear there can never be enough and never will. But the "at risk" kids are not the only ones out there. Hard enough to get vouchers for the "at risk" kids just to get into a peforming school. And instead of complaining why not embrace all such programs because programs that are geared to the high achievers are but a fraction of the available programs for kids out there.
You made my point...and
You made my point...and before you start hurling characterizations at me...how many kids have you taught?
Want some examples? As a 3-day teacher @ an At-Risk school, let's start with the 6 classes I have that are inclusioned, which means most kids are on an IEP. Then we'll consider the other 8 classes I have that are not inclusioned but where the majority of the class are not reading/math on grade level...they're just low.
Then we'll move to the "average" kids who receive no help/additional money from anyone. My kids were among that group & it hits boys particularly hard. They are slipping through the cracks every day, every year.