The Virginian-Pilot
©
Four University of Virginia law school students - assisted by a professor and a high-flying law school alum - are gearing up to fight for the right of women to serve in combat, and they're interested in finding women in the military who want to join them.
Their effort, dubbed The Molly Pitcher Project, seeks to end military policies that categorically bar women from serving in units engaging in direct ground combat. The project takes its name from the woman who took over loading and firing a cannon after her husband fell ill during a Revolutionary War battle.
In the 1990s, Congress repealed laws banning women from flying combat aircraft and serving on warships. But positions in infantry and armor units, as well as special operations, are still off-limits. Earlier this year, a congressionally mandated commission recommended lifting all combat restrictions; Pentagon leaders are studying the issue and are expected to report back to Congress on the issue soon.
Kyle Mallinak is one of the second-year law students inspired to work for change after discussing the issue in a law and public policy class last spring.
He emphasized that the aim isn't to change physical fitness standards or establish a quota for women. The goal is to allow women who meet the military's standards to serve in any job. Women make up about 15 percent of the active-duty military.
"This is not about diversity at its core. It's not about a belief that we need a certain amount of women in everything," Mallinak said. "It's about individual dignity."
Anne Coughlin, the professor who taught the course and serves as a sponsor for the project, said women should be allowed to compete for jobs in elite units.
"We're not asking for special privileges, but if there are women who are fit and want to step up, the military should allow them," Coughlin said.
The military acknowledges that it can't operate in combat theaters without women in the ranks, Coughlin said, noting that in Iraq and Afghanistan, women have been killed in action and some have been awarded prestigious medals for bravery under fire.
"What we're just asking them to do is acknowledge, formally, publicly, honorably, what these women are doing," Coughlin said.
The Pentagon could propose that women be allowed to serve in some or all billets that are currently off-limits. Gen. Ray Odierno, the Army's chief of staff, has said he would like to see more jobs in combat battalions open to women, though he has stopped short of calling for an end to all gender-based limits.
The Pentagon could decide to change its policies on women in combat without congressional approval - doing so would require only notifying lawmakers. That's different from the landmark decision this year to allow openly gay men and women to serve in the military, a change that required Congress' support.
Another way to end the restrictions would be to challenge them in court as unconstitutional.
"It would be perfectly fine for us to never see a courtroom," Mallinak said, "But given the glacial pace that change comes at the Pentagon, we'd want to be prepared to litigate if necessary."
That's where Tally Parham comes in. Parham, who graduated from U.Va.'s law school in 1996, recently agreed to serve as lead counsel for The Molly Pitcher Project. An attorney in Columbia, S.C., she also knows a thing or two about serving in combat: as an F-16 pilot with the South Carolina Air National Guard, Parham flew air strikes in Iraq in the opening days of the war in 2003.
"I think the No. 1 test for the composition of any military fighting force is, what enhances combat effectiveness? What enhances military readiness?" Parham said. The most important individual traits for military success are skill, courage, determination and discipline, she said. "We've proven over and over and over again, none of those qualities are gender-specific."
Although Parham continues to serve in the Guard, she's involved in The Molly Pitcher Project as a lawyer and private citizen, and is working on the effort pro bono.
She said she understands that women on active duty, especially young ones, might not want to make waves by talking about what they can't do in the military. As a young pilot trying to prove herself, she said, she tried to stay away from discussions about gender and simply focused on doing her job as well as she could.
"I'd always hoped that at the point where we had large numbers of women in the leadership, change would just naturally occur," Parham said.
But that hasn't happened, so it's time to do more, she said.
"If there are women out there who are willing to challenge these issues of unfairness, then I'm happy to be their advocate."
Kate Wiltrout, (757) 446-2629, kate.wiltrout@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


The Molly Pitcher Project At UVa Law
There shall be no restrictions/prohibitions on females serving in any combat roles or capacity in all branches of the United States Armed Forces including the NAVY SEALS, DELTA FORCES, ARMY RANGERS or Special Forces of the Army, Air Force, Coast Guard, Marines and Navy.
As citizens of the United States of America, females shall enjoy all the rights and privileges enumerated in AMENDMENT XIV (FOURTEENTH) of the United States Constitution.
The United States Military Armed Forces practice of barring women from certain combat roles in the United States Military which is supported by public tax dollars appears to be a blatant violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
More equal
I'd like to see this group first push to have the physical fitness standards for women made equal to men. Look up OPNAVINST 6110.1J and compare the physical readiness test standards in the Navy. In order to be rated Satisfactory a 20-24 yr old woman needs to do the same number of situps as a man, less than half as many pushups, and run 1.5 miles 2 minutes slower. Military members can be administratively discharged for not meeting these standards, and the standard for a male is greater than a female. I support giving equal opportunity to men and women, but I also expect that there be equivalent performance standards to meet. Any move to give women equal opportunity that doesn't address the standards difference is not sincere.
About time
Next, let's get children in combat...and where's the representation from the the learning disabled?
The problem lies in the first paragraph of the article
"Four University of Virginia law school students - assisted by a professor and a high-flying law school alum - are gearing up to fight for the right of women to serve in combat, and they're interested in finding women in the military who want to join them." 4 students, a college professor and an attorney who was profiled in USAA Magazine years ago are fighting for a right that no one in the military has deemed neccessary. It's called making crap up. Besides, can America tolerate the kill or capture, rape, and torture of young American women in hand-to-hand combat and jungle warfare. I won't.
IT MIGHT WORK
Women are NOW serving in combat roles.
They are part of convoys, check points, provide security etc.
I think this is workable but these women need to be volunteers and meet all of the physical qualifications without any exceptions.
War is NOT a social experiment and it might be very difficult for the Western "mind" to wrap itself around this concept.
The military is already being stripped of personnel and monies while the world threat is greater.
Nice school project but "schools" aren't reality ; especially in War situations.
Good luck; I hope it works.
you're somewhat confused
Just because women are succeeding in convoy, security and checkpoint operations doesn't mean they are, on average, fit to be in the infantry or Special Ops. There's a difference between operating in these supporting functions and the daily grind experience by the grunt who goes out on footpatrol, night raids, etc.
This is nothing but an attempt at a social "experiment"
The only thing this will lead to (if adopted) is a reduction in morale, readiness along with reduced good order and discipline. The main reason women haven't been allowed in those fields has nothing to do with their ability to perform the job. There are some who could. That's simply not the point. If putting them there causes friction then it affects efficiency.
Women are now promoted faster than their male counterparts so that is no longer an excuse for them. The military has always been about efficiency, never about "fairness". Some people just don't get it and never will.
btw, pilots are no more "combat" than UAV pilots sitting in a bunker thousands of miles from the drones.
"pilots are no more "combat" than..."
"pilots are no more "combat" than..."
http://hamptonroads.com/2009/01/navy-panel-continue-search-pilot-lost-gulf-war
Remember Scott Speicher?
How many rescue/search missions have been conducted for "UAV pilots sitting in a bunker thousands of miles from the drones"?.
True!
I agree. It is important to remember that the US military is not intended to represent the population that supports it. (It would be difficult to state the military serves the population, based on the utter contempt many in these discussions hold for the US population. Then again, based on your posting, it would seem you have little but contempt for anyone whose military service differs from yous.) They have the right to demand whatever they want, to refuse any order or directive from civilian authority, especially those that have never served in the active duty forces (though, interesting, Roosevelt and Wilson were both successful war time Presidents who never served in the military). Its the 21st century. Get over your sexist ways.
Women In Combat
I fully agree that women should be allowed in combat, I also agree that women should be able to hold any job in the military that they are qualify for. However I do not agree that it should be on a volunteer basic. If women are allowed to hold jobs that involve combat, then like men, if the unit is ordered into battle and that unit has women attached then they should go with their unit without question. I understand that the thought of women being taken prisoner and being tortured and rape I am sure would be part of that torture it is something that we would not want to think about, but unfortunately war is war and in this day in age we don’t want to admit it but torture is part of being a prisoner. I am sure that if a women is taken prisoner rapes