The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
The city and its school division are facing an estimated combined $90 million budget deficit for the next fiscal year, a gap created largely by falling real estate tax revenue and increases in health care and retirement program costs.
The expected shortfall for the fiscal year that starts July 2012 was unveiled at Tuesday's annual financial forecast meeting between the City Council and the School Board, a gathering that kicks off the budget season.
The city's share of the deficit - $41 million - comes despite increases in stormwater, sewage and water fees and a new $10 monthly trash fee that starts in January and, so far, no planned raises for city employees.
A predicted 5.5 percent drop in property assessments is expected to punch a $22.6 million hole in the two budgets, said Catheryn Whitesell, the city's director of management services. If that prediction holds true, it will be the third year in a row that property values fall. Tuesday's forecast called for real estate values to decline through 2015.
Among other factors, Virginia Retirement System costs are expected to climb $26.3 million, and health costs $16.1 million. And increasing debt service is biting off $6.5 million more on the city side.
"We've got some challenges, but I'll say we've had these challenges before, and we'll figure it out," Mayor Will Sessoms said.
Last year, the combined potential budget deficits were $19 million, and the year before they were $84 million. State law requires cities to pass balanced budgets.
Next year's total spending for both budgets is pegged at $1.78 billion, higher than this year's $1.74 billion.
The city could dip into its fund balance, or savings account, a tactic the City Council has used the past several years. There is $112.6 million in that account, and budget officials said up to $30 million could be used to help balance next year's budget. Proposed department cuts could slice the deficit by an additional $9 million, Whitesell said.
The school division's budget deficit is $49 million, which includes $15 million for 3 percent raises for employees. The division needs to give at least a 2.5 percent bump to match this year's salaries, which included a one-time bonus paid for with stimulus money, or employees will actually be paid less.
School Board Chairman Dan Edwards said it's difficult to know where the division will cut without knowing if or how the city will adjust the school funding formula. The schools get 51.3 percent and the city gets 48.7 percent of seven city tax revenue streams.
The funding formula has been a source of friction between the two bodies as revenues tighten in the sputtering economy. City Manager Jim Spore and Superintendent Jim Merrill, who were tasked with coming up with the recommendation, said Tuesday they need more time to work it out.
Edwards said the division faces the prospect of having fewer teachers and larger class sizes.
"We can keep doing that year after year, but at some point it becomes irresponsible," he said.
Pilot writer Mike Hixenbaugh contributed to this report.
Aaron Applegate, (757) 222-5122, aaron.applegate@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

If you can't. . .
. . .handle the cuts necessary and feel overwhelmed by it all, get out of the way and let someone decisive have your job.
Just go to. . .
. . . zero baseline budgeting for a few years. It's not that hard.
Maybe they should quit
Maybe they should quit putting smart boards in every classroom and use the ol chalkboard or whiteboard and actually teach the class instead of letting computers teach our kids. Laptop computers for teachers to use with these smart boards. Cell phones for employees who more than likely already have a personal one. I understand times change and so does technology, but why does a kindergartner or anyone in elementary school need a smart board in order to learn? They are firing teachers based on seniority and not performance leading to kids still being left with difficult teachers who really don't want to be there in the first place.
Congratulations again John Moss!
You're right I almost forgot. There may be a light at the end of the tunnel. John Moss is the newest AT LARGE member of VBCC. Finally there is another person on council along with Bill DeSteph that will bring some financial sanity to the council and some relief for the ordinary moribund boo-bird taxpayers. It's time VBCC focus on actual needs and the true functions of government vice the wants.
Reality check
Moss and Desteph are only two votes. They represent a fringe constituency and will be unable to build alliances on council. Basically Moss has replaced Reba Mclanan as the 2nd "no" vote on everything.
Lest you think that they will get help next year (or in 2014) guess again. You have extremely popular, well-funded incumbents with broad support. The Moss crowd will not benefit from a low turn out.
Guess everything is perfect in your small world. ..
We have a massive shortfall of 90 million & your more Interested in what Moss & DeSteph can't do. Never mind the fact that residents are not receiving a ROI despite supporting 85 percent of the budget. We need to stop the massive subsidies to special interest including monumental TIF abuse. We need to remove the most one sided tax base in the nation. You appear more interested in fleecing our 140,000 homeowners that now average 25 years in age & need major upgrades.
Lowest taxes, highest bond rating
Actually Al, no, there is no massive shortfall; by next May, the budget will be balanced. The Council's support for projects that increase our tax base are among the most popular in the City; the Town Center, the 31st Street Hilton, Park, Garage, and retail shops; the expansion of Lynnhaven Mall, the protection of Sandbridge, the purchase of the ten mile long ROW to preserve our public transit options, the construction of the V.B. Convention Center, all of these show foresight and entreprenurial competence that has been positively commented upon by the rating agencies when we earned the highest bond rating available in the United States. These and other actions are the reason we have the lowest tax rate in the region.
Rubbish Mike!
We have the lowest tax rate in the resin because we have almost double the population of the rest of the cities in Tidewater. There are more people in this city paying taxes. If there is no massive shortfall then why bring it up? $90MIL? We have already been soaked for $120.00 a year for trash service plus higher storm water and sewer maintenance fees. Now we have $90MIL plus another $70MIL for the another anchor hotel and a government run dome site? And light rail. Oh OK..we'll raise the rates back to $1.19 per hundred and we'll still have the lowest rates in the region. That will make it alright? We don't need more taxes and fees and we certainly don't need more debt. Feed this rubbish to someone else sir.
Little To Do With It
While you can achieve some economies of scale with a larger population, total population has little to do with the tax rate.
Virginia Beach's low population density increases the costs of service delivery.
Few Pretend Things Are Perfect
The vast majority realize our City government has problems, especially with spending priorities. However, only a tiny fringe are crazy enough to want to hand the keys of government to the extremist VBTA. The VBTA would destroy Virginia Beach in order to give some selfish senior citizens a short term Property Tax rate cut. Of course, taxes would have to be hiked massively in the long term to straighten out the mess.
Moss slipped onto Council in a 15% turnout special election. Last Presidential election we had a 70% turnout. If you believe the dynamics of a 70% and 15% election are similar, put down the VBTA Kool-Aid and push it away.