76°
forecast

Beach officials: Hotel would lure bigger conventions

Posted to: Local Government News Virginia Beach

VIRGINIA BEACH

The city's $207 million convention center opened in 2005 with high expectations. A consultant predicted the sprawling facility along 19th Street would draw twice as many major conventions and trade shows to the Oceanfront as its predecessor, the Pavilion, fill hotel rooms on the resort strip year-round, and result in millions of dollars in yearly spending.

Six years later, as debate heats up over new plans to build a $109 million, 361-room headquarters hotel with a sizable public investment, the center has surpassed total attendance projections.

But the 500,000-square-foot facility has attracted just over half as many convention and trade show guests as predicted. Those coveted visitors tend to come in larger numbers, stay in town longer and spend more money.

The convention space instead has been filled more frequently by smaller events that typically draw local and regional crowds for consumer shows, meetings and conferences.

And to the surprise of tourism officials, much of its business has been driven by sporting events.

"The center's success should be measured by its overall impact on the community," said Courtney Dyer, convention center manager. "It draws people to the city who wouldn't otherwise come, it fills hotel rooms during our traditional slow season, and the space is there as a resource for local groups.

"I'd say it's doing what it's supposed to do."

Like the Pavilion before it, the convention center has never made money. The city spends about $5.8 million a year to operate it and takes in $3.6 million in user fees, leaving an annual city subsidy of about $2.2 million. (The city further pays $15.1 million a year on debt service for the facility, money that comes from the Tourism Investment Program, which is derived primarily from hotel, restaurant and amusement taxes).

Because of fierce competition with other convention centers, many groups - including the recent national table tennis tournament - rent the convention space at little or no cost. Others are offered discounted meals or free shuttle service to hotels.

"Convention centers on paper rarely make money," said Jim Ricketts, the city's tourism director. "You always have an operational loss."

Revenue generated by convention center visitors more than offset the public investment, city officials say. In addition to user fees, officials estimate convention center users paid $3.4 million in hotel, meals and admissions taxes, for total city revenue of $7 million in the last fiscal year.

The city estimates the center has generated an average of 130,000 hotel room nights a year the past five years. Those visits resulted in an estimated $36.8 million spent by visitors in the city last fiscal year. That's short of the $47.5 million projected in a May 2000 PricewaterhouseCoopers report.

The center has averaged 69,000 visits a year from conventions and trade shows, far fewer than the 120,000 projected in the 2000 study. The estimates reflect the convention industry standard of counting participants once for every day they attend a conference.

Much of the traffic instead has been generated by large sports competitions, including two annual races that account for more than a third of the hotel room nights credited to the center.

Combined, the Shamrock Marathon and the Rock 'n' Roll Half Marathon send 78,000 people through the convention center each year and generate 49,000 hotel room nights, according to city estimates. By comparison, the 18 conventions held at the center in 2010 generated fewer than 30,000 hotel room nights combined, according to city estimates.

Although both races predate the convention center, city officials say it's fair to count them toward the center's impact because both events demand large space for race registration and running expos. Other sporting events draw sizable out-of-town crowds as well, more than making up for the shortage of conventions, Ricketts said.

Recent national championships for cheerleading, field hockey and gymnastics combined to draw 22,000 visitors, according to estimates. The table tennis championships generated nearly 2,000 hotel room nights in the city last week, Dyer said.

A large portion of the center's 490,000 annual visitors are for community events that include weddings, meetings and consumer shows. They are often day-trippers who spend less here than conventioneers. More than a tenth of the center's annual visitors, some 60,000 people, come for high school graduations each spring.

Although city officials contend the center has been successful, they acknowledge the facility isn't drawing as many major conventions as it should. A headquarters hotel could change that, said Al Hutchinson, vice president of convention sales and marketing for the Virginia Beach Convention and Visitors Bureau.

He said the city's plans to build a four-star Hyatt hotel next to the convention center would lure larger groups and bigger spenders. Under a deal proposed with developer Armada Hoffler, the city would put in nearly $67 million in upfront costs, including $19 million in loans the developer would repay.

A divided City Council has scheduled a Jan. 24 vote on the hotel. City officials say the city is losing millions of dollars a year in meeting business without a hotel attached to the convention center.

Visitors bureau officials solicited dozens of letters of support for the hotel from meeting planners and convention industry leaders. Across the board, the message was consistent: If the city hopes to lure national conventions, it needs to build a headquarters hotel.

Peter Pantuso, president of the American Bus Association, told the visitors bureau his group probably wouldn't return to Virginia Beach after bringing more than 3,000 tour bus operators and managers here for its annual weeklong convention in 2008.

"It was challenging because we had members scattered across the city at several hotels," Pantuso said. "Shuttling people around became very cumbersome."

A new hotel would put Virginia Beach back on the bus association's radar, Pantuso said, but wouldn't guarantee its return.

Meeting planner Terri Sweet Ribble of Conference-Direct said the city needs more than a hotel. She visited the convention center and noted the lack of nearby restaurants and entertainment venues.

"It just struck me as really strange that the city would spend that amount of money to build that gorgeous facility without anything to support the business," she said.

The convention center hotel, city officials say, would trigger that development.

Mike Hixenbaugh, (757) 222-5117, mike.hixenbaugh@pilotonline.com

Aaron Applegate, (757) 222-5122,aaron.applegate@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Business Lobby is in full court press & damage control

Ops! Darn! Somehow the taxpayers discovered the secret "deal" being hatched behind closed doors! And the Mayor tied so hard to pass this mess during the Christmas season so no one would notice. Drat!

Those pesky taxpayers! How dare they question the brilliance of the special interests that dump so much cash into the local elections and put togehter such impressive powerpoint presentations, bogus cash flow projections, and inticing artist's renderings?

Don't the rabble that object to their elected City Council members willingly climbing into bed with their new "business partners" understand that the definition of an honest politician is that once they are bought, they STAY BOUGHT ???

Tidal wave of support

So Greenmun I guess you forgot to say that you have said the same thing about every proposed PPV that the City has considered. You can be depended upon for a knee jerk negative reaction, in this case before you even had the time to read, analyze, and discuss the deal. You and the moribund VBTA has opposed every initiative that has increased the commercial tax base and which helps keep our tax rates low. So why should this deal be any different, and in fact, you have behaved just as expected. But of course other citizens who understand the positive effects of the Amphitheater, Town Center, sand on Sandbridge, a parking deck at Lynnhaven, 31st Street Park and Hotel, have taken the time to understand this deal. They will soon speak.

Repugnant!

Mike you don't get it. First, government isn't supposed to hatch $67MIL deals behind closed doors, spring it on the public, and vote on it after two hours debate. Second, the mayor of a city is supposed to seek the wisdom of the constituents in the first place, vice getting mad that he was found out. Third, it isn't the function of government for taxpayers to be forced into being investors in private enterprise. Owning certain areas of a hotel amounts to having a pee section in a swimming pool. Government owes private enterprise an opportunity, not a subsidy. And fourth... most important...government shouldn't seize property using the power of eminent domain for purported public use, change it's mind, and then give it to private interests.

Repugnant!

Mike you don't get it. First, government isn't supposed to hatch $67MIL deals behind closed doors, spring it on the public, and vote on it after two hours debate. Second, the mayor of a city is supposed to seek the wisdom of the constituents in the first place, vice getting mad that he was found out. Third, it isn't the function of government for taxpayers to be forced into being investors in private enterprise. Owning certain areas of a hotel amounts to having a pee section in a swimming pool. Government owes private enterprise an opportunity, not a subsidy. And fourth... most important...government shouldn't seize property using the power of eminent domain for purported public use, change it's mind, and then give it to private interests.

WOW REAL DESPERATION NOW!

Well Mike Barrett has moved beyond damage control to outright desperation for this boondoggle. Now he accuses Kerry Dougherty for finding out the real deal and pointing out the hatchet job this HQ hotel will do to the taxpayers. I am wondering when he will come out and say that John Moss and Kerry are one in the same person. Fact is Mike can't stand opposition to any PPV. He is still suffering from sour grapes over John Moss's election to VBCC. It has driven him over the top that Kerry has a forum to point out the obvious and he doesn't. More so readers give Kerry a lot more creditability than him.
Great job Kerry Dougherty! Keep up the good work And congratulations again John Moss. This moribund boo-bird appreciates both of you.

This Whole Thing Is About a Fishing Trip

And the knowledgeable angler knows that - it is not how deep (pockets) you fish, it is all about how you wiggle your worm.

Once our worm of a city is beyond compare with finished roadways, sidewalks, upgraded communities (not only the resort area), enhanced SW management, expanded oceanfront parks larger than yards in Bay Colony, utility poles beneath the ground/side street along Atlantic Avenue north of the Cavalier and other yet untargeted and necessary improvements have been funded, acted upon and finished to completion, stand back - wiggle the worm - and all manner of businesses sought by the movers and shakers for the oceanfront will swim to the worm and gobble it down large.

hotel at convention center

why should the city spend approx. 67 million for a new hotel at the convention center, it is just taking money away from all the other hotels at the beach how are they suppose to make a living by keeping their rooms all booked?

Learn the deal before issuing criticism

Like about 90% of the posters, you reveal you simply don't understand the deal. The City is not putting up any money to build the hotel and meeting facilities; the developer is fully responsible for spending the entire $109 M to build the hotel, the meeting space, and the bridge. Then, once a certificate of occupancy is issued, the City will finance its part of the deal, the state will finance the cost of the connecting bridge, and the developer will put up its share in form of the financing from the city and their equity contribution. Since the city will issue revenue bonds, to be paid by the new revenue that results from the new visitors, the only money the city is "putting up" is the loans to the developer which will be paid back.

Kinda over looked the land and $450K a year to Hotel

Gee Mike, you kinda left out the part about the 5.9 acres of taxpayer land and the $450,000 a year to be handed over to the Hotel to build a mulri-million dollar slush fund for taxpayer funded "meeting spaces" we don't need.

WE TOLD YOU NO!!!

You don't listen and NOW you must go!!

You lied to our faces to get elected and then turned around to get down on your knees for the likes of Ba'al Thompson and the rest of your money-grubbing friends.

You have held secret meetings and made financial commitments with OUR money WITHOUT our consent and approval. You have created committees & appointed your families & friends, AGAIN without our approval & consent. This is taxation without representation and it's illegal.

Add it all up and it equals CORRUPTION & DECEIT.

You don't follow the law or proper protocol. Why should we? YOU mut be removed from office IMMEDIATELY & proecuted for your crimes against us!

HERE US NOW!!! Your deceptive actions will no longer be tolerated!!!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Local Government rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


FIND US ON FACEBOOK