76°
forecast

A business undone by Congress

Posted to: Editorials Opinion

For more than a year now, the U.S. Postal Service has sounded the alarm about the financial crisis that is slowly but surely killing it.

The one group with the power to help it stave off disaster couldn't pretend to be less interested.

In the past year, Congress has had time to ponder the content of school lunches, to bemoan the demise of the incandescent light bulb, to grandstand on the national debt and motto, to decry government regulations hampering economic activity.

Yet it has all but ignored the pleas from the postal service, a self-sustaining organization being crushed under the weight of a 2006 law passed by - you guessed it - Congress.

That law required the postal service to prefund retirees' health care benefits at a rate far greater than any other federal agency, an arrangement that might have appeared reasonable when mail volume held steady in the early part of the past decade but has proven much less so in the years since.

Between 2007 and 2011, mail volume dropped 20 percent, eroding the postal service's primary revenue stream and forcing it to tap a line of credit simply to meet its Congress-mandated annual contribution - nearly $6 billion - for prefunding retirees' benefits.

By 2016, the postal service must have $59 billion on hand to cover decades' worth of obligations. It has lost more than $20 billion in four years and assumed about $15 billion in new debt. Its annual contributions to the fund exceed 12 percent of annual revenue this year, and it has already saved $42.5 billion, more than enough to cover all of its retirees.

The 2006 law, of course, isn't all that is preventing the postal service from competing on equal ground in the marketplace. The organization is prohibited by Congress from cutting a delivery day, and it isn't permitted to delve into new businesses to raise additional revenue. Its rate increases for first-class and standard mail are capped at the cost of inflation, so while other businesses raise prices according to supply, demand and other variables, the postal service cannot.

Politicians proclaim constantly that government must be run like a business. But no business is as constrained as the postal service, and no business has a board of directors as incompetent as Congress.

It's little wonder then that postal service officials would announce, as they did this week, that delivery times are likely to be delayed next year. Failing congressional action to relax the prefunding requirement, the postal service's only recourse is to lay off employees (more than 100,000 have been let go in the past four years), shutter community post offices and consolidate operations.

Those are desperate, last-gasp measures made by a business in distress, a scenario that invariably leads to poor decisions, such as the proposal to close Norfolk's mail processing and distribution center and reroute the region's mail to a Richmond-area facility that ranked worst in the nation in terms of delayed delivery.

They are the kinds of moves that will ultimately undo one of the great institutions in American life, a constitutionally mandated network that still allows for hand-delivery of a letter from coast to coast in three days for 44 cents.

It is a decline that would be entirely avoidable, if only Congress would get out of the way.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Killing the Post Office

So the Congress is requiring the Postal Service to pay the government (NOT invest) enough money over ten years to fund Postal employees' retirement for seventy-five years - and this is supposed to guaranty the funds will be there when they retire? This is clearly nothing more than another cash grab by the same body that has "borrowed" Social Security surpluses for decades and now says we have to raise income and other taxes and reduce benefits because the system is now, or will be, unsustainable. I would ask how stupid they think we are, but the answer to that question has been obvious for years.

Put off paying for the retirees' benefits ... until ???

Sure. We can let them off the hook for prefunding their retirees' benefits.

We can keep all the current facilities open and continue providing all the current services. This will ensure the continued growth of a large pool of retirees.

Oh, wait!

That means at some point in the future, a huge pool of retirees will be ready to claim benefits which had not been prefunded. Where will the money for those benefits come from?

No sweat. We'll worry about that when the time comes.

I look at it this way. What

I look at it this way. What would we do if we had to "prefund" social security? The country would be broke (broker?)before it could fund any other program. This is a prime example of what happens when congress tries to micromanage anything. If these are the same people we want to turn all our healthcare over to it will be the biggest mess in centuries.
If the Postal Service is part of government then let it tap into the same retirement as other government employess. If it is seperate then leave it alone to manage its' own affairs. This is a large scale picture of what will happen to all of us when Obamacare kicks in. Even if you can't afford a home, food, or clothing you will still be required to pay for health insurance and if you can't afford it the government will fine you.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox