76°
forecast

Chinese drywall maker loses another court ruling

Posted to: Business Consumer - Retail News Norfolk Realty News

NORFOLK

Different day. Different court. Same result.

A Norfolk Circuit Court judge entered a default judgment against the Chinese manufacturer that produced the tainted drywall that made some local homes unlivable.

It's the second ruling in two days against Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., which sold more than 150,000 sheets of drywall to a Norfolk construction supplier in 2005 and 2006.

Federal product-safety regulators have found that the drywall emits gases that corrode metal in homes and recommended it be removed.

The hearings this week mark the first appearances by the Chinese company in local courts.

While a hearing Wednesday in Virginia Beach Circuit Court involved one couple that sued over the tainted drywall, Thursday's hearing involved more than 170 homeowners in the region that have cases pending in Norfolk Circuit Court.

The families sued several companies, including Venture Supply Inc., the Norfolk company that imported the Chinese drywall. Last summer, Venture Supply named Taishan as a third-party defendant and served the lawsuit to the company in China. As in the Virginia Beach case, Taishan failed to respond to the suit within the 21 days required by Virginia law.

Venture Supply's attorneys sought a default judgment against Taishan, which means the Chinese company could have financial responsibility if the local distributor loses the case.

Jon Talotta, a McLean-based attorney representing the Chinese manufacturer, again argued that the firm had not responded to the local cases because there was no resolution over whether U.S. courts have jurisdiction over the foreign company.

"We think that the court can't enter a default unless it finds personal jurisdiction," Talotta said.

Norfolk Circuit Judge Mary Jane Hall disagreed, saying that a default judgment would not prevent the company from raising the jurisdiction question later.

In April 2010, a federal judge in New Orleans awarded $2.6 million to five Virginia homeowners in a lawsuit against Taishan after it never responded. The company appealed two months later.

Nearly a dozen families whose homes were built with Taishan's drywall attended Thursday's hearing, as did Sam Porter, owner of the now-closed Venture Supply.

The rulings this week against Taishan are incremental steps in local litigation over who is responsible for fixing the tainted homes. Attorneys have acknowledged that a resolution for homeowners could be years away.

Josh Brown, (757) 446-2318, josh.brown@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

The end result

The end result will be homeowners with Chinese drywall will not get any compensation from Chinese drywall manufacure.

Better Resolution

China given 60 days to pay all losses or USA pays our high priced union workers with three hour breaks a day to rebuild all homes and deducts double the price from our Debt to China

The Federal Government is responsible for allowing this crap

into the country along with aliens, terrorists, drugs, killer bees...let them pay to demolish and rebuild the homes better than before with FHA 0.0% loans for 40 years.

Egads, Jones, that's OUR

Egads, Jones, that's OUR money you're talking about lending out at no interest. I have an interest in getting that money to use myself to fix one up, but know it would be wrong to put it onto the taxpayer backs for something that benefits me alone. Yeah, the govt shouldnt have let that crap in, but they didnt know about it. Just like they know nothing about all the stuff coming in - they learn about it later and stop it. I think we ought to ban most stuff from China. Our production would then kick in, altho at a higher price.

Which would trigger

Which would trigger inflation which is good and bad. It would reduce the amount that people currently owe on mortgages but would reduce exports. I say try it. We cannot feed China any longer.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Business rss feed    Consumer - Retail rss feed    News rss feed    Realty News rss feed   



Toolbox