The Virginian-Pilot
©
PORTSMOUTH
In part to determine how planned offshore wind farms could affect maritime navigation, the U.S. Coast Guard is undertaking a large-scale study of government, commercial and pleasure boat traffic up and down the Atlantic coast.
While the Coast Guard routinely looks at vessel traffic on a port-by-port basis, the study that's now under way is the first to examine waters beyond port entrances, from Maine to Florida. The outcomes could be far-reaching, including recommendations for new international agreements or vessel-routing measures where none exists.
As part of the investigation, officials are asking for input from maritime industries, commercial watermen and recreational boaters who operate within 200 nautical miles of the East Coast.
"What we're doing is identifying all of the uses of the water now so we can plan for the future," said John Walters, chief of the waterways management section for the Coast Guard's 5th District, based in Portsmouth.
Officials decided to launch the examination about a year ago, around the time that the U.S. Department of the Interior announced so-called "wind energy areas" off the coasts of several Atlantic states, including Virginia. No offshore wind farms are operational yet, but more than a dozen are at various stages of development.
While it is the Interior Department's responsibility to oversee them, it's the Coast Guard's job to ensure safe access to and from U.S. ports. It became clear that a comprehensive study was needed, Walters said, especially in light of other potential uses that have been discussed for East Coast waters, such as oil and gas drilling and manganese mining.
To carry out the examination, officials are relying largely on information gathered from an automatic tracking system that is used by many vessels and feeds data on their individual positions, courses and speeds.
Additionally, the Coast Guard is seeking written guidance from the public. It issued its first call for input in May, noting that some of the wind energy areas "are located in or very near the traditional routes used by vessels in foreign trade and on Atlantic coastwise transits."
The Coast Guard added, "The impact to safe and efficient navigation appears to be significant, although not yet characterized."
Roughly two dozen responses came back by the August cutoff date. Groups representing mariners - such as the Virginia Maritime Association and the Virginia Port Authority - called for continued, unimpeded port access.
Offshore wind developers expressed worry that their projects could be stalled.
"If navigation and offshore wind interests are not properly balanced, the impacts to offshore wind could be quite significant," wrote Jim Lanard, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Offshore Wind Development Coalition. "While the right to navigation may be 'paramount,' this does not mean that shipping routes should be laid down without consideration of other important uses."
On both sides, much of the feedback was broad.
"We got a lot of general comments - things like, 'We're glad you're studying this. We have concerns,' " said Emile Benard, with the Coast Guard's Atlantic Area.
So this month, officials put out another, more detailed call, including a list of specific questions for stakeholders: How are your coastal tug and barge routes affected by weather? Do you regularly transit coastal waters in a recreational yacht? If yes, how far offshore is your typical route? What are the pros and cons to the Coast Guard designating traffic routes? Should there be separate lanes for different types of vessels and for vessels traveling in opposite directions? Should their use be mandatory?
The Coast Guard will accept input through Jan. 31. After that, it will compile its findings into a report that, ideally, will provide a comprehensive picture of how coastal waters are being used.
Benard said the report also might include recommendations for significant changes, such as new vessel routing measures - or for no changes at all.
Corinne Reilly, (757) 446-2949, corinne.reilly@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Well...how about this....
Well, how about this. Build ONE (1) fully functioning wind turbine tower in the ocean in the ACTUAL wind farm tract. Learn firsthand the problems and costs of constructing one out there. Operate it for two years collecting data. The raw data should be available to multiple monitoring agencies to ensure lack of bias. Measure how much energy it can produce on average. Monitor the effects of the ocean on it. Monitor the effects of nor’easters and hurricanes on it. Monitor its effects on local and migratory birds. Monitor its effects on ocean navigation. Monitor its effects of local radar and military early warning systems. Totally reckless to charge ahead with this without doing some serious research to see what we are buying into here.
I don't know why........
Why doesn't anyone attempt something with the tides that come in and out.....or tidal hydroelectric if you will if there is such a thing....seems there would be so much power if we channeled and used the tides with dams and the like.........more than any wind tower and with less visual impact.
Green...the color of money...
Unfortunately in its present state of development, the 'green' in wind generated power has more to do with the color of the money to be made selling and installing these towers and systems, and the extra money for electric bills consumers will payout in increased energy costs.
Protecting the environment is a good cause, but protecting it AT ALL COSTS is foolhardy and cannot be sustained.
Besides, placing these huge expensive towers and turbines offshore directly in the middle of Hurricane Alley is just insane to begin with. They call this general area of ocean the 'Graveyard of the Atlantic' for good reason.
jumping the gun by even planning this right now.
Do a little research and pay attention to the FACTS not the FANTASY. While there may come a day when alternative sources are viable, that day is NOT today. We should learn by Denmark's mistake and not damage our environment and economy by building these farms. In high winds, ironically, the turbines must be stopped because they are easily damaged. In Denmark, build-up of dead bugs has been shown to halve the maximum power generated by a wind turbine, reducing the average power generated by 25% and more. Build-up of salt on off-shore turbine blades similarly has been shown to reduce the power generated by 20%-30%. On average Denmark's 6,000 wind turbines produce LESS than 18% of their estimated output. Use brain before acting.
I hope this info isn't
I hope this info isn't coming from the CEPOS report, bought & paid for by the American oil & coal industries and later discredited.
Bird Navigation Hazard
It isn't only ship navigation that could be affected. An ironic problem usually overlooked by proponents of wind energy, concerns the fatal effects on migratory birds. There are reports of birds getting killed by the thousands, over time, from flying into the spinning turbines. "Green" energy is more aptly named "red" energy in these installations, for the bloody toll it extracts from the wildlife population.
Although the attraction of wind farms is understandably strong, it isn't reasonable to ignore serious concerns of the negative side effects, in a headlong rush to achieve green energy satisfaction. The disadvantages just might outweigh the advantages, despite the allure.
OFFSHORE WIND FARMS
Wind projects in Massachusetts, Delaware, and off Long Island have all been cancelled due to the enormous increased costs for the customer per Kw hour and Mw hour of energy developed. The project is not cheap and does not, regardless of the myths out there, lower the costs or make it greener.
Texas implemented a Green Energy Program supported by wind power. A recent report revealed that the average monthly electric bill increased about $58 per month (almost $700 per year) under this program.
Going "green" is smart for the environment but it is not smart right now for the consumer until more reasonable costs for the energy are developed.
Wind projects in Mass have
Wind projects in Mass have also been canceled due to NIMBY syndrome.
Not in my back yard for good reason!
I would be on board with that too, but I don't live there anymore. I live north where there are wind farms and they absolutely destroy the natural view/vista. I don't feel the benefit is large enough overall (unless you own the property and reap the lease monies). There is no reduction in power bills whatsoever.
And that's just the customers
You know this stuff was subsidized out the ying-yang.