77°
forecast

Heinicke's the real deal, but Hokies ...?

Posted to: Bob Molinaro Sports

Musings about college football after a big weekend of action and reaction:

The thought of three more years of Taylor Heinicke is not a bad consolation prize for Old Dominion fans.

Against Georgia Southern, Heinicke didn't do anything we haven't seen before in his remarkable first year of college ball, but his performance on the road against a favored opponent should heighten awareness of just how good this kid is and what his future may hold.

Considering the competition, his movement in the pocket and downfield running were better Saturday than they had been all season, while his accuracy continued to be as sharp as we've come to expect.

The extraordinary consistency with which Heinicke puts the ball on the numbers or into the hands of his receivers - on short quick throws or long passes down the sideline - already has spoiled his admirers. He fits his passes into the tightest of windows. He processes information with such poise and confidence that he makes it look easy.

After less than one full season behind center, his excellence is taken for granted. It shouldn't be, but that's what happens when a quarterback completes 69 percent of his throws for 25 touchdowns, with only one interception.

The second he stepped in for the injured Thomas DeMarco, Heinicke appeared oblivious to the so-called pressure young quarterbacks are supposed to feel. The Georgia high school star considered too small by BCS schools came up very big for ODU. The mind reels at what he might do in big moments yet to come.

Favored to win the ACC championship game, Virginia Tech crumbled in its big moment, but Frank Beamer's team never was as good as its national rankings.

Climbing as high as No. 3 in the USA Today/coaches ranking and No. 5 in the BCS standings before being routed by Clemson epitomized the disconnect between the Hokies' poll numbers and the team people saw on the field.

Tech never deserved to be a Top 5 team, even by the fuzzy math used to determine the national pecking order, but when the Hokies lost by four touchdowns Saturday night, eyes rolled and people said, "Tech folds in another big game. What a surprise."

That's sort of true, and yet not exactly fair. So in the spirit of the holiday season, let's accentuate the positive in the Hokies' season.

Even with a team flawed enough that it was outscored 61-13 by Clemson in two games - one in Blacksburg, the other in Charlotte - Beamer and his staff cobbled together 11 victories.

Tech's weak schedule eliminated it from serious BCS title consideration, but stamping out another season of double-digit victories, even in the squishy ACC, is no cause for despair among the faithful. And look how it's paid off for a team that's beaten nobody, just lost by 28 points and fell to 11th in the BCS standings - with a trip to the Sugar Bowl to meet 13th-ranked Michigan, a far grander venue than either team deserves.

The bowl bid has everything to do with how well Tech fans travel, for the team has been overrated all year. But at least give Tech credit for this: unlike Clemson, losers of three of four going into Saturday's game, it didn't let go of the rope. Until Saturday, the Hokies found ways to win. That's become a habit in Blacksburg.

With the BCS, there's always room for skepticism. Those who thought Oklahoma State's rout of Oklahoma on Saturday might have propelled the Cowboys past Alabama and into the BCS title game may want to consider how the selection process is impacted by tradition.

How much of the human element that is factored into the BCS rankings was influenced, if only in the slightest, by the football profiles of the two schools?

Alabama's is far greater, of course. But had the No. 3 team closing fast on 'Bama been Florida, Ohio State, Southern Cal or Oklahoma - schools with more national cachet than Oklahoma State - would voters have leaned more in their favor? Would we be getting an Alabama-LSU rematch then?

It's not unreasonable to assume we wouldn't. In this BCS horse race, Oklahoma State's less pure-bred pedigree probably hurt its chances.

If ever in doubt, suspect the worst of the BCS process. You'll rarely be wrong.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

NO BCS Credibility

Does Clemson deserve to go to the Orange Bowl? Absolutely not after its mid-season swoon but the contract says the Orange Bowl gets the ACC champion regardless of its quality as a team so off they go. Does VT deserve to go to the Sugar Bowl? Absolutely not. They have been overrated all year and continue to be overrated. They avoided tough teams on their schedule and folded when challenged. But they sell tickets. And, it is apparently, only about money. So off you go, VT. Good luck. Oh, and the BCS? It's time for it to go away too.

If not the BCS then what?

Strength of schedule rankings at the end of the year? Check 'em out. LSU (1) playing Alabama (2) is correct. Iowa State (5), 5&6 record / Texas (6), 7&5 / Kansas (7), 1&10 record and on and on till Boise State (77), 11&1 but #7 BCS, sits home. There is a difference between tough teams and tough games. After expenses and sharing with other conference members you may be suprised at what schools, particularly in the lower tier Bowls, actually profit.

Thanks Bob

For making recruiting the "blue chip" athelets for the ACC, particularly our in-state teams, much easier. It's amazing that VT has accomplished what they have with the constant media bashing of the ACC/VT and never once mentioning the defensive injuries Tech had. VT has a good loyal coaching staff. 90% of the FBS teams would love to have their record. Is Bill Brill channeling thru you?

Hokies?

There is no doubt now that the polls and bcs are ridiculous. Virginia Tech was never a top 10 team, but it seems scheduling fluff is rewarded now. IN all honesty, its not just the non-conference games, the whole acc is a joke. There are usually 3 teams in it that could compete year to year in other conferences but as a whole its a basketball conference and guarantees wins to school like Virginia Tech.
Every college football fan should be mad that better teams were left on the table. And even being a Michigan fan I serioulsy doubt they should be getting any sugar either

right on the rankings

There is no reason to even have the rankings before yesterday so Tech being #3 never should have happened, nor FSU #5 to start the year, etc. Save the rankings and hype until the end. We need a playoff anyway. Tech did its job to get into the top 12 and you are right on that the fans are the ones who got them in the Sugar. Travelling to bowls in the past paid off in a big way last night.

Va Tech and UVa--growing together

Bob misses the point sometimes on Virginia football, esp Va Tech and UVa. We should not try to be like the SEC; the ACC is tough enough.

Virginia's BCS teams--Va Tech and UVa--are growing together. Amazing that 'Hoos got a good bowl; a credit to new coaching staff and head coach, Mike London, ACC Coach of the Year. We travel well, esp to Atlanta, and Auburn will be a huge challenge for 'Hoos! A good showing by UVa would aid a recovery of a recruiting edge we badly need ...

I'm also delighted that Tech is playing Michigan--that's the type of competition they (and our state) need. We don't need more SEC attitudes. And Tech is better than their latest loss to Clemson shows. I'd say the Blue will have their hands full--and vice versa.

Misisng the point?

Your missing the point! This isnt a sewing circle. The bcs games are supposed to reward the best teams in the country, not their states or their fans. Thses are bowls that should be awarded solely on the body of work. The other bowls are for the also rans. Its why the bcs was created.

And so.......

based on their "body of work" should Clemson be going to the Orange Bowl? Are you suggesting doing away with the conference ties to BCS games? Everything is about $.

bowl ties

It seems that should be the case. if noone in a conference is what is recognised to be in the top 10 then yes those ties should be overlooked. How in fairness can you say these are the bowls that are for the exceptional teams and then skip down 10 positions and pick up a team because it won its conference or in Va Tech and Michigans case not won. Seems like that defeats the purpose. Or maybe there should just be one bcs bowl period. the top two teams and drop all the rest of the phony selections. These bowls pay big money not that the others dont for a football game.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Bob Molinaro rss feed    Sports rss feed   



Toolbox