The Virginian-Pilot
©
Do you remember the days before cellphones?
In the not-too-distant past, before the phones became as ubiquitous as air, you couldn't dial or receive calls while you were behind the wheel. Folks had to call someone before they left home, or after they arrived at their destination. You actually had the luxury of being "off the grid" for a while.
Somehow, we survived the lack of technology.
This will sound like fantasy - maybe heresy - to a generation nursed on laptops, iPads and other wireless gadgets. Today, there are 5.3 billion mobile phone subscribers worldwide, or 77 percent of the global population.
And there's no question that cellphones are a convenient way to keep in touch with each other. They help us complete our "to do" lists more quickly.
Still, convenience isn't everything.
That's why federal officials just recommended that all 50 states and Washington, D.C., ban using cellphones while driving, except in emergencies. Too often, the habit jeopardizes safety and leads to accidents, injuries and deaths. The five-member National Transportation Safety Board voted unanimously for the ban following several fatal crashes across the country.
It's a smart move, and it should force state legislatures to examine the issue more seriously. Motorists have turned their cars into mobile offices, social networking sites and gossip centers. They've forgotten the primary reason for driving: to get from Point A to Point B, safely.
The feds didn't make their recommendation cavalierly. There's a body of research, over the past decade, that shows the dangers when motorists use cellphones to text or call. Professors at the University of Utah have done yeoman work on the subject.
For example:
- In 2001, they found hands-free phones were just as distracting as hand-held ones. They later found that the conversation itself was more of a distraction than the device. "Such drivers aren't aware they are impaired," they said.
- In 2005, a study suggested that when teens and young adults talk on cellphones while driving, their reaction times are as slow as those of elderly drivers.
- In 2006, researchers noted that motorists who talk on cellphones "are as impaired as drunken drivers."
Many drivers believe they shouldn't have to make sacrifices because they can handle the phone and the road just fine.
The problem is they aren't multitasking as well as they think. A federal survey, for example, found many drivers don't think texting is dangerous when they do it - but it's a problem when others do.
It's easy enough to pull off the road and make a call or text - with the engine in "Park."
I do not consider last week's recommendation by the NTSB some sort of "federal overreach." Officials have undertaken several crusades over the years, from seat belts to air bags to raising the drinking age. Such steps have made it safer for everybody on the highways.
State legislators have a chance to do the right thing by stiffening Virginia laws. They should be encouraged by a study by AAA Mid-Atlantic, which found that 66 percent of Virginians polled within the last year favor a ban on texting and cellphone use while driving.
Technology, after all, shouldn't kill you.
Roger Chesley, (757) 446-2329, roger.chesley@pilotonline.com, pilotonline.com/chesley

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
I think all of these studies are flawed and meaningless.
I think all of these studies are flawed and meaningless. I don't think one of them is done in a way that represents actual driving conditions. These or drunk driving experiments.
Maybe I'm gifted or something, but I don't need 100% of my attention to drive. In fact, a distraction is often lifesaving since I find the most boring part of my day is the drive to and from work. Listening to the radio and friendly chatter with family and friends actually helps to keep me alert or at least more alert than I would normally be. I will admit that some conversations are so focused that I have to pull over and I do, when needed.
It is the responsibility of the individual to police themselves in these matters.
Nothing will improve without
Nothing will improve without a police presence on our streets and highways.
Pull them off the failed war on drugs and start writing more traffic summonses
In Tidewater you can start with no signal, tail-gating, and improper lane changes, it's a constant, and I'm sick of it. And residential speeding in a 25. Where's a cop when you need one ? Busting students for pot at ODU.
And eating also!
Just yesterday I was almost t-boned by a person trying to stuff some kind of food object into their mouth with one hand and make a 90 degree two handed turn with one hand at 40 miles per hour...this is me still shivering!!
I guess we have to take your
I guess we have to take your word for it that you're competent and responsible. But the fact that you see nothing wrong with letting incompetent and irresponsible people continue to use thier phones while driving so that you can too makes me wonder which catagory you truly belong in.
quoting a previous comment
"What you are calling for is limiting the responsible and the capable to make the world safe for the irresponsible and incompetent."
"Why must we always hobble the capable so the incompetent can keep up?"
Sorry, but they have to be the most arrogant comments I've ever read.
I would like to be protected from unsafe drivers.
It doesn't matter if they are driving while intoxicated, jabbering on a cell phone, texting on a cell phone, smoking, putting on make, too old to drive or whatever, I would be delighted if the NTSB reccommended that all of the above be outlawed, it could only make our roads safer.
there is no thought process
There is no thought process to smoke while driving, nor taking your eyes off the road, nor a conversation with the cigarette.
Perhaps at the exact moment you're smoking
But when you fumble around in your purse or on the seat to get to the pack of cigarettes, retrieve the cigarette from the pack, put it in your mouth, get to the match or lighter, light the cigarette, put the match out and put it away (or lighter), smoke the cigarette then put the butt into the ashtray (because no smoker would EVER just chuck it out the window), there's a pretty good chance that at some point you'll take your eyes off the road.
I see you have no problem defending your vice while condemning others'. What was that you said earlier about arrogance?
"chuck it out the window"
"chuck it out the window"
Only for the wind to toss it through an open rear window and fan an open fire. Seen that more than once.
defending your vice while condemning others'
CS it's not my vice I don't smoke. I was thinking that smoking does not require a thought process like running your mouth on a cell phone that's growing out of your ear while driving a vehicle. This artice is about cell phones, not smoking, eating or other activity. Not sure how you see that as arrogant, but whatever.