77°
forecast

Navy finds no misconduct in BASE jump death

Posted to: Military Virginia Beach

VIRGINIA BEACH

The death of a Navy SEAL in an off-hours parachute accident last year occurred in the line of duty and was not due to misconduct, a Navy investigation found.

Petty Officer 1st Class Tyler Stimson died July 16, 2010, while parachuting off a cellphone tower in Suffolk. He was BASE jumping - a high-risk, often illegal sport that involves parachuting from fixed objects.

Stimson, 30, was a member of Virginia Beach-based Naval Special Warfare Development Group, known informally as DEVGRU or SEAL Team 6. The unit attracted worldwide attention in May when it killed al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden in Pakistan.

Stimson's conduct did not rise to the level of recklessness or willful neglect, the commander of the unit wrote in his report, noting that he was engaging in an activity "closely resembling those which our operators engage in every day."

"To succeed, we must train hard and accept risks most others would refuse," he wrote. "Risk is inherent in our daily lives."

The investigation report was provided to The Virginian-Pilot last month in response to a Freedom of Information Act request. Names of the commanding officer and other principal players in the investigation were deleted.

The "line of duty" determination means that Stimson's dependents are eligible for military survivor's benefits, said Lt. Arlo Abrahamson, a Navy special warfare spokesman.

Stimson was married with no children.

Abrahamson said the determination was made in accordance with Navy legal standards. Under those standards, simple negligence, or carelessness, does not constitute misconduct, he said.

Stimson took numerous steps to mitigate the risk, the commander wrote. He was an experienced sky diver who donned the proper gear, attended training classes, consulted experts in the field and planned his jumps thoroughly.

Stimson was a combat veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan and a recipient of the Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal.

As many as 10 members of SEAL Team 6 have been known to engage in BASE jumping in their off-duty hours, the investigation found.

The acronym "BASE" stands for building, antenna, span and earth.

A fellow SEAL, Jason James Tompsett, 31, was with Stimson in the predawn incident and jumped off the tower successfully. He was charged with trespassing by Suffolk police. The charge was dismissed in Suffolk General District Court.

The 250-foot-tall tower off Godwin Boulevard is surrounded by a barbed-wire security fence with "no trespassing" signs on it.

"While I do not condone trespassing," Stimson's commanding officer wrote, "the trespassing did not proximately cause" Stimson's death.

In response to the accident, the commander wrote, the Navy initiated "a thorough review of high-risk activities specifically concentrating on off duty recreational activities."

It remains unclear whether BASE jumping is an approved recreational activity for SEALs.

"We don't publicly discuss specific approved and disapproved training and recreational activities within our command," Abrahamson said by email, "but we can tell you any approved activity is carried out in a manner consistent with Navy safety instructions and in good judgment with regards to operational risk management."

Abrahamson did say trespassing is not tolerated. "We hold our service members accountable for their actions and expect them to abide by Navy instructions, community standards and all applicable laws," he said.

April Phillips, a spokeswoman for the Naval Safety Center in Norfolk, said there is no official Navy-wide policy regarding BASE jumping.

"But in many cases it's illegal," she said. "State and local laws would come into play."

Even if done legally, she added, a proper application of risk-management principles would indicate that "it may not be a good idea."

Stimson's jumping partner found him lying face-down on top of his canopy with its suspension lines wrapped around his feet. He died of multiple impact injuries to the head, neck and torso.

None of his equipment was found to be defective.

A Navy parachute specialist who examined Stimson's gear told investigators it appeared that Stimson rolled into a head-down position in which the lines became entangled in his legs, causing the canopy to engulf him. In such a short jump, he didn't have time to disentangle himself.

"BASE jumping is a very unforgiving sport," said Larry Pennington, owner and operator of Skydive Suffolk, a local sky diving center where Stimson was a regular jumper.

It's "an entirely different breed of cat" from sky diving, which is done from an aircraft at heights up to 13,000 feet, Pennington said.

A typical sky dive lasts 60 seconds, he said. In contrast, a typical BASE jump lasts two to six seconds.

"There's nothing wrong with a BASE jump as long as it's done properly and legally and is done with the proper gear," Pennington said. "If you don't adhere to the laws - not only of the state, but of God and gravity - they both have serious results."

Pennington said the only place he knows of in this part of the country where BASE jumping can be done legally is the 876-foot-tall New River Gorge Bridge in West Virginia, where jumpers are welcomed one day a year - the third Saturday in October.

He tried it once about 25 years ago, "when I was a little bit younger and dumber," Pennington said. That was enough.

"Tyler was a good guy. He was a very safety-conscious guy. He just made a mistake," Pennington said. "You shouldn't think less of him. It was just what he wanted to do. Unfortunately he had some bad luck."

Bill Sizemore, (757) 446-2276, bill.sizemore@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Disgusting behavior

This was just another example of how lame the Navy has become. They say they do not "Condone" trespassing while actually condoning it. Obviously the Navy does not understand the difference between a necessary risk and a foolish risk.The whole episode sounded like a bunch of drunken teenagers trespassing and climbing onto a water tower for a cheap thrill. The US Navy made a big statement. A statement that sent a message that no matter what foolish act is committed they will condone it. And the tax payer will shucking out a lot of money.

The death of one of the elite defenders of our country

There is an irony of fate found in the tragic death of a Navy Seal. It takes a very fit human to qualify for this outfit. One has to be pumped and constantly in shape to be ever ready for a call that can come at any moment.

I can feel the adrenlin rush as these two young men challenged the cell phone tower that took the life of one of them. I can understand the Navy investigators finding the event falling within the parameters of seal training. The military takes care of their own.

We know that a civilian doing said act would bring civil or criminal
punishment for trespassing. In a way, it was misuse of government property for the exploit was not authorized and risked the lives of a true asset of the Navy. A very sad ending.

"misuse of government property"

What government property was he misusing?

Misconduct

It was misconduct - no question about that. I thank him for his services and want his wife to get benefits, but this was misconduct. If he had not made the jump, he would still be alive.

Truly sad

A lot of the posters here who are outraged that the family of a man who served his country in combat will receive death benefits at taxpayer expense are the same ones who advocate for free lunches, welfare and every other entitlement under the sun.

weak

First off, my condolences to the man's family.

Sir, you make a weak strawman argument. What you are attempting to say is that we shovel taxpayer funds to people who don't deserve it, but would deny someone that does deserve it. People receive entitlements such as free lunches, welfare, etc., because they QUALIFY for them. If the family of this man does not deserve death benefits, it's because he disqualified himself due to his own misconduct. Using your logic, we should pay for free lunches, welfare, etc. even to people that do not qualify. This man was a hero and a role model, but it doesn't make any difference - the taxpayers should not be on the hook for this.

Charitable contributions to the family are more appropriate.

Sad?

What is truly sad is your farcical attempt to turn this into a partisan political debate concerning wholly unrelated issues, attempting to avoid the issues that everyone else - from both sides of the debate - have been focusing upon. From what I see, not one posting suggested anything having to do with those other policy issues you raised. In all probability, there is less consensus than you imagine.

The Fix Was In

I did a lot of line of duty/misconduct investigations in my JAG days. They are similar to what an insurance company does before it will pay out under a liability policy. Only in this case we taxpayers pay both the insurance premiums and the payout if the investigation determines that the injury or death occurred in the line of duty. We taxpayers got hosed on this one. Trespassing is a crime and is per se not in the line of duty. The firefighter analogy that one of the posters below made is right on the mark: If a firefighter commits an act of arson so he can "practice" putting out the fire, it's still arson.

Hero

This guy is a HERO.
I guarantee you that no one making these comments can fill his shoes. We sit in our warm houses watching sports and putting sports figures on a pedestal, but these are the guys we should be looking up to. We should be thanking them for what they do to allow us to sit in our warm or cool houses and not worry about the people in this world that are trying to kill us.
How do you know that this was not a training mission?? We are not told everything they do as we can not handle it as you have proven
This is what these guys do for a living. They don't sit behind a computer and put down every news story. They are Aces in my book and I real feel sorry for you if you do not get it. But hey, it's your right to have your opinion.

no one

no one is above the law.

period.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Military rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features