81°
forecast

Perry files suit challenging Virginia ballot access

Posted to: Elections Federal Government News Virginia

From staff and wire reports

Texas Gov. Rick Perry filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday challenging the validity of a Virginia statute that keeps his name from appearing on the primary ballot.

Republican presidential candidates Perry and Newt Gingrich failed to qualify for Virginia's Super Tuesday primary ballot. The Republican Party of Virginia said early Saturday that Gingrich and Perry had failed to submit the required 10,000 signatures to be included on the March 6 ballot.

Virginia GOP spokesman Garren Shipley said in a statement that volunteers spent Friday validating signatures on petitions submitted by former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Texas Rep. Ron Paul, Perry and Gingrich.

Three other candidates – Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum and former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman did not submit signatures before Virginia's deadline of 5 p.m. Thursday.

In a news release, Perry's campaign called Virginia's ballot access rules "the most onerous" and said they unconstitutionally restrict the rights of candidates and voters by severely restricting access to the ballot.

"We hope to have those provisions overturned or modified to provide greater ballot access to Virginia voters and the candidates seeking to earn their support," the release said.

In the suit, filed in the Eastern District of Virginia, Perry said the defendants members of the state elections board and the chairman of the Virginia Republican Party violated his freedoms of speech and association protected by the First and 14th Amendments.

Perry's campaign also is asking the state Republican Party to have him listed on the primary ballot, the news release said.

Gingrich's campaign also has blasted the state rules as part of "a failed system."

"Voters deserve the right to vote for any top contender, especially leading candidates," Gingrich campaign manager Michael Krull said in a statement released to McClatchy/Tribune News Service.

Gingrich's campaign had said the former House speaker would pursue an aggressive write-in campaign, though state law prohibits write-ins on primary ballots.

In a Facebook message posted Saturday, however, Krull did not mention a write-in campaign. "By now you've likely heard that our effort to gain access to the primary ballot in Virginia was not successful," he said on Facebook.

"We are exploring alternate methods to compete in Virginia stay tuned."

On Monday, Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli was suggesting the legislature ease the requirements for access. Virginia's process "screams out for making our ballot more accessible," he said in The Cuccinelli Compass, his online newsletter.

But the process to change the law in time to mail the primary ballots on Jan. 21 is complicated.

The General Assembly meets Jan. 11, and lawmakers would have to pass emergency legislation to have it go into effect immediately with the governor's signature, the Richmond Times-Dispatch reported.

Emergency legislation requires a supermajority, the newspaper said. Eighty of the 100 members of the House of Delegates and 32 of the 40 state senators would have to vote to change the law.

The legislation also would be subject to approval by the governor. Through his spokesman, Gov. Bob McDonnell has made his view clear that the rules for getting on the ballot were well-known, the Times-Dispatch reported.

Paul Goldman, a Richmond lawyer and former Virginia Democratic Party chairman, is helping represent Citizens for the Republic, a conservative group, in challenging Gingrich's disqualification, Politico reported.

This story was compiled from reports by Pilot writer Lauren King and The Associated Press.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Yes, but...

Yes, the ballot access laws here are far too restrictive. And yes, they should be changed this assembly session.

But until that happens, I can't see a reason to ignore those laws and put a candidate on the ballot who didn't meet their requirements. I also can't see a strong legal argument why the laws are invalid.

Crying For Perry...

What a crybaby... I'm voting for Ron Paul in the primary! LOL

hmmm...

Signatures? We don't need no stinking signatures...

Excellent - short and to the

Excellent - short and to the point.

The

rules for the primary were clear prior to the deadline. Hard to argue that. If they wish to change it in the future, then that is a another matter. However it is a bit odd the number of democrats posting on this article seem obsessed with the Republican primary. Instead of defending their candidate, they are interested in mainly denigrating people they can not vote for in the primary and have no intention of supporting in the general election.

You're mistaken

There are no party affiliations in Virginia. If there was going to be a Democrat and Republican primary, then a person would have to declare and only be allowed to vote in that primary for the party they declare. However, since there won't be a Democrat primary the Republican primary is open to all voters. Therefore, this election holds importance to all voters in the state.

If the Republicans could

If the Republicans could field a candidate who does not seem to be a nutcase, Democrats might well vote for him or her. As might Libertarians, Independents, etc. In this particular case, anyone might be offended by those who think the rules don't mean them. For myself, I vote for a person, not a party.

It is the lawyers fault.

It is the fault of a lawsuit. Previously if they had the ten thousand signatures the party just passed it on as certified but since a lawsuit after the last election they are now balancing them against the roles of registered voters. Sort of like the "Hanging Chad" debacle. Apparently Gingrich and Perry had to many unverifiable signatures. Good thing they don't have this in Chicago (where Obama is from) because I hear a lot of the signatures there are picked up in cemeteries. As a kid in Illinois I worked on campaigns and collected signatures. It isn't that hard. You ask if they are a registered voter, you make sure they write down their address, you thank them for their support. A group of 4 or 5 could easily get 1,000 signatures a day.

really?

poor planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine. the other candidates had to follow the same exact rules. the affected candidates argue now that virginians have the right to chose yet they chose that it was not important enough to meet deadlines. if they couldn't care enough to get signatures to get on the ballot how much would they really care about virginia as president?

i understand the argument for the little guy needing signatures but these are big names.

Yuk-Yuk

I hope no taxpayer money is being wasted to put Rick Perry on Virginia's ballot. What if Perry succeeds in getting on the VA ballot, only to suspend, or quit his campaign, once he starts losing the early primaries (which is the real possibility)? The last thing this country needs is another Republican governor from Texas taking us down the drain.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Elections rss feed    Federal Government rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners