The Virginian-Pilot
©
Life would be a lot simpler if only everyone had stayed awake during civics class.
Imagine, never again having to hear some chucklehead say the government has a "right" to do something.
(News flash for snoozers: The government has no rights. The citizens have them. People grant limited power to the government and can take it away, too. Thank you, Mr. Hensler, seventh-grade social studies.)
Beyond that, if all Americans had at least a passing knowledge of our founding documents, we'd never again have to whip out our pocket Constitutions to prove that the words "separation of church and state" are not in there.
On the other hand, some of us then would lose bets to those who insist that the Constitution guarantees us a right to be tried by a jury of "our peers." (It doesn't. All we get is a trial by a jury made up of do-gooders and those who couldn't get out of jury duty.)
Why lament this lack of civic education now? Because some law enforcement types - from the TSA to local cops - have been inventing a "right" for themselves: The right not to be filmed while performing their duties.
Sheesh.
Sorry, officers. That isn't how it works. If you're camera-shy, don't apply for a job that involves a badge and a uniform. These days, everyone with a cellphone is also an amateur film director.
Which brings us to Alton Robinson, a former Norfolk civic league president who was arrested and tossed in jail last spring after videotaping two unwilling uniformed police officers at a New Black Panther Party Parade on Goff Street.
According to a story by Pilot reporter Patrick Wilson, Robinson had filmed his young daughter at a Salvation Army function before he trained his camera on the sparsely attended Panther outing and two uniformed officers.
What followed was not pretty. Here are a couple of the testy highlights.
"Why are you recording me, sir? I'm not giving you permission to record me," one officer said.
From behind the camera, you can hear Robinson's voice insisting that he is doing nothing wrong.
"It's against the law to record without a permit," the other chimed in.
He was right. Chances are it is against the law - in North Korea. Not in the U.S., however.
In Robinson's tape, one officer appears to yank the camera out of his hands. Another seems concerned about having his picture posted to Facebook. Of course, now the exchange can be viewed on PilotOnline.
Initially, the police tried to charge Robinson with "unlawful filming." Ultimately, he faced two misdemeanor charges, which were dismissed in court.
Look, cops are supposed to know better. When I talked to police spokesman Chris Amos on Tuesday, he said even recruits know they can be photographed by members of the public.
In fact, footage from a student riot last winter at the University of Maryland has been used in police training. In it, unruly students encounter police in riot gear who wade into the crowd. The encounter happened at night.
"We ask them if they notice all those little white things all over the film," Amos said. "Those are cameras. Everybody in the crowd was filming. You can and will be on camera."
Nothing cops can do but try not to behave in a way that will make the clip a hit on YouTube or get them an unwanted cameo on "The Daily Show."
When I spoke with him Tuesday, Robinson was on his way to talk to a lawyer. He's considering a lawsuit.
Hang onto your wallets, taxpayers. Trampling on an American's civil rights can be expensive.
Kerry Dougherty, (757) 446-2306, kerry.dougherty@cox.net, PilotOnline.com/dougherty

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Ron Paul 2012
Kerry, you are correct. However, I find it odd that you believe this, yet continue to endorse people like George Bush or John McCain. Tell me, is there a GOP candidate out there who openly and actively advocates personal liberty? And, assuming you know exactly who I am talking about, would you sacrifice your seemingly strong beliefs for personal liberty to vote for someone else just because you think they have a better shot at Obama?
If you don’t vote based on principle, you are no better than the police who knowingly over stepped their authority and confiscated private property. You are the problem. You are like the person who doesn’t vote, and then complains about politicians. Remember, the lesser of two evils is still evil.
Taxpayers
U.S. citizens are not use to being pushed around. They love who they want, have babies when they want, eat what they want,and dress the way they want. Anyone interfering with this in the past has been run over. I expect in due time the same will happen with this movement. The U.S. citizen will prevail. They have been raised to believe freedom is theirs for the taking.
Someone give ODUnorfolkian a
Someone give ODUnorfolkian a shove. He's stuck saying the same thing over and over.
They must get the point!
It is because I kept reading the same wrong things over and over again.
Do more research!
I usually agree with you Kerry, but in this instence you need to do more research. You said "He was right. Chances are it is against the law - in North Korea. Not in the U.S., however." I have gone back and did some research for you and at the time of this recording and engagement by the police it was illegal to film activities in Norfolk. The code was 29-68.1, which has been repealed because of issues such as this. I have spoke with several officers that explained to me that the code has been around for some time and that they do not write the laws; they only enforce them. If you should have a problem with a law, contact the City Attorneys Office. Ask the right questions if you want an unbiased opinion!
Law
To hell with the "law". Power trumps law every time.
to ODUNorfolkian
That law was probably repealed due to it being unconstitutional. The courts have held time and time again that if you are in public, you have no expectation of privacy, and anyone can photograph/record,film, etc. And, on top of that, that ordinance was written to prevent commercial work, not private citizen use. Otherwise, it would be illegal to take vacation pics, etc...
norfolk.gov - city government-code of ordinances
29-68.1 City of Norfolk Law. (a) No person, firm or corporation shall engage in any filming activity in or upon any street, way, highway, road, parkway or other public property; or parcel unless the city manager has granted a permit for such filming, provided that a permit shall not be required for news coverage of contemporaneous events or documentaries not for profit.
http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=10121&stateId=46&stateName=Virginia
"provided that a permit
"provided that a permit shall not be required for news coverage of contemporaneous events or documentaries not for profit."
To me this reads that the ordinance cited is for film crews, movies, etc. and not for private citizens with cameras. Of course now he may get some profit off the film when he sues the City.
Not just NPD
This is happening all over the country; in fact, all over the world! Of course, in many countries a person could be shot for taping a police officer doing his job. I think the whole thing really got started with the Rodney King episode. Some slack has to be given to some officers, though. When the adrenalin reaches critical mass, judgement sometimes is impaired. I'm not condoning it, just explaining it.