The Virginian-Pilot
©
The stoplight at the bottom of the Market Street ramp in Norfolk was red, and traffic was still. My phone rang: "The good news is they've got an appointment for you. The bad news is that it's right now."
I drove to the office, turned on my computer, ran down some coffee, turned off my computer and headed back to Suffolk.
And just like that, I raised my taxes, though politicians prefer to call them tolls.
Within an hour, I had passed through the Downtown Tunnel twice, and before lunch I would drive through it again. In all, I'd make four trips through those tubes that day.
If it were the end of 2012, in addition to the hours I spent going to and from Suffolk, I'd also spend more than $7 in one day to get back and forth (and back and forth) from home to work.
It's a bill that thousands of other drivers in Hampton Roads will face come 2012.
Right now, there are about 100,000 vehicles that travel through the Downtown Tunnel (the number is a little less than 40,000 at the Midtown). In about a year, we'll have to pay $1.84 during rush hour for that privilege, a number that could rise every year.
At the Downtown, we'll get precisely nothing for our money at first: No quicker transit, no better scheduling of lifts, no potpourri to mask the diesel exhaust. We'll be paying in anticipation of plans to spruce up the Downtown Tunnel and to add a tube to the Midtown. Anticipation is expensive.
So, of course, is the political cowardice in Richmond and Washington that has left highway funding in this nation a scandal of dwindling resources.
You know this. We all know this, as we ride across roads paved with busted asphalt and spreading seams: Our transportation system is a dangerous embarrassment and growing worse, with not a bit of political courage in sight.
And so the state has signed away two of the busiest river crossings in America to a private company that has an obligation to turn a profit. That will make investors wealthy (I will borrow and give you every penny I can if you'll promise me a 10 percent return). But it does so by taking a few bucks out of the pockets of everyone who uses the Downtown and Midtown tunnels.
Politicians love to say that tolls are "user fees," but that's a distinction relevant only when there are practical alternatives to paying. To cross the Elizabeth River from Portsmouth to Norfolk, there are no practical alternatives. And since transportation is one of the state's few clear obligations, that makes this a new state tax for 70,000 people. It's a huge one.
For a family making $50,000 in Hampton Roads, going through one of the Elizabeth River tunnels every day will amount to a new tax of more than $900 a year, or almost 2 percent of annual income. If politicians in Richmond decided to raise the state income tax rate by that much, you can be sure there would have been plenty of debate. Perhaps some screaming.
Until the last days before the state inked the deal, there wasn't a peep over the Downtown and Midtown tunnels. Mostly because the details of the deals were kept from us until the last few days, like the provision that the state has spent days protesting isn't a noncompete clause. They have a point. The deal with Elizabeth River Crossings doesn't include a noncompete clause. It includes a provision requiring the state to pay ERC if it builds a competing crossing. I'm sure you see the enormous difference.
To add insult, the state's current public-private partnership law requires a public comment period, but the old one didn't, officials argue. Guess which one was used?
I began writing this piece to talk about what these tolls mean for Hampton Roads. How I would've asked for a referral to a specialist in Norfolk rather than Suffolk, simply to keep me out of the tunnel. How restaurants in Norfolk will get a few bucks more expensive for folks from Portsmouth, at a time when we're all counting our pennies. How we'll all think twice before we go from Military Circle to Western Branch, or from Holland to Ghent.
I'll save that for another day.
In the meantime, a deal is being put together for a new U.S. 460. Consider this a warning. We know the tolls will be huge on the road itself. We know that some of the plans have included tolls on other highways.
A new highway would be nice to have, but it's not close to what Hampton Roads needs most. Even so, if the Downtown and Midtown deal is any indication, what Hampton Roads wants may not matter. As the folks in Richmond have made clear, all they want from us is to keep quiet and pay up.
Donald Luzzatto is The Pilot's editorial page editor. Email: donald.luzzatto@pilotonline.com.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Robert Pozen's on Gingrich
Clarification. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled the U.S. government has no obligation to pay Social Security to anyone, even if they paid into it! The social security trust fund isn't a lock box, therfor it is empty, because the federal government borrowed all the money out of it, and, according to the U.S. supreme court ruling, has no obligation to honor the IOU it put in to repay the funds; therfor it never will! Private investment by taxpayers is not as risky! Government control of funds is a sure thing the money will disapear! Harvard is a bastion for liberal thinkers who want the government to control everything and to collect evry penny made by anyone in taxes. Mr. Pozen shows his ignorance by not researching the facts that the top 1% of income earners pay more than 50% of the taxes collected by the government and the top 5% pay 85% of all taxes collected by the government!!! The government will never have enough taxes because it can not control spending! It is NOT the governments money! American people earn it and should keep it!! Shrink government, shrink taxes, grow the economy! Tax revenue increases everytime!
Blame the politicians? I don't think so.
May as well blame the dog for being a dog. Why? They cannot help themselves, politicians will insist on being politicians just as dogs will insist on being dogs. The real blame lies with the people. Why do you think infrastructure, not just here in HR but nation-wide, has been neglected for decades? Because it wasn't sexy enough to garner votes, that's why. The politicians couldn't get elected promising to fix THOSE problems, so they didn't bother. They did what the public sent them to Richmond (or Washington, or Austin, or Sacramento, or Albany) to do, whatever that was for that particular election cycle - it was not infrastructure. Now, because of an unfortunate bridge collapse that coincided with a politician's need to create 'shovel ready' jobs (and the uniformed publics belief that infrastructure jobs were 'shovel ready') to push a socialist agenda, infrastructure is sexy enough to garner votes. And sexy enough to garner headlines as well, it seems.
Toll Payers should blame themselves
It is easy to blame the politicians. However, the real blame lies with the voters of the 7 cities of Hampton Roads. The road referendum of 2002 was defeated by a wide margin. The voter's turned down a 1 cent hike in the sales tax. The tax would have funded the new mid-town tunnel, MLK freeway extension, Dominion Blvd & the Steel Bridge, a 3rd crossing and a few other projects. All without tolls! State Senator Marty Williams from Hampton who sponsored the bill was quoted after the road referendum was defeated as saying "this has set Hampton Roads transportation back 20 years". He was then promptly voted out of office in the next election for his support of the 1 cent tax. For the mathmatically challenged; residents would have to buy $368 worth of goods each day for the proposed tax to equal a round trip toll. Mr. Luzzatto as Editor of the editorial page is responsible for commentary on transportation issues. I find it less than comprehensive commentary to leave out the historical facts and place the blame solely on "political cowardice".
They deserve the condemnation
The Pilot has been a constant advocate for increased funding for transportation. To blame them is absurd. Our Delegates took an oath to do what is best for Virginia, and they have broken that oath as they have underminded transportation infrastructure by failing to provide the funding level necessary to maintain, sustain, and repair it. This failure has been accompanied by a political strategy and talking points by republican politicians designed to create the perception that we don't need an increased revenue stream, which is absurd on its face, and the consquences of which we see around us everyday in potholes, structurally deficient bridges, leaking tunnels, worn out road markings, and congestion at all our choke points. This is an intentional result of republican intrasigence; stop defending them; they deserve the condemnation.
You are right on, Mr. Luzzatto!
Let's appease the wailings of the "we demand a higher gas tax" crowd.
Let's just do what Mr. Luzzatto has explained. Instead of calling what you have to pay to use the tunnels a "toll," let's drop the term toll altogether and just come right out and call it a "tax." There would be a $1.84 "tunnel tax" to use the tunnels during rush hour.
VOILA!
Now everybody's happy! The tolls are gone and we are paying for roads and tunnels with taxes like many have been insisting and demanding.
Now, how hard was that?
Don is one of those unlucky
Don is one of those unlucky motorists who will feel the effect of the failure of our Delegates to raise the funds necessary to fund construction, oprations, and maintenance of our transportation system. Ironically, the situation is so bad that shortly, the city and counties will be given the responsibility to fund local roads without support from the Commonwealth. Knowing how irresponsible the Delegates are, they will take credit for reducing taxes as they blame local officials for raising funds locally for transportation. Those who smugly assert that we should pay for all new projects with tolls, but aren't directly effected now, will soon feel the local obligation when their local government has to raise taxes to improve and maintain city streets. Then the outrage will spread from areas of localized impact, that Luzatto is speaking of, to all of us. In the meantime, those republicans who proudly they have not raised taxes, and who now want to fund transportation with money taken from education, will keep earning their pensions as they slowly destroy the infrastructure of the Commonwealth of Virginia while hiding the effect from the voters.
Don is one of those unlucky
Don is one of those unlucky motorists who will feel the effect of the failure of our Delegates to raise the funds necessary to fund construction, oprations, and maintenance of our transportation system. Ironically, the situation is so bad that shortly, the city and counties will be given the responsibility to fund local roads without support from the Commonwealth. Knowing how irresponsible the Delegates are, they will take credit for reducing taxes as they blame local officials for raising funds locally for transportation. Those who smugly assert that we should pay for all new projects with tolls, but aren't directly effected now, will soon feel the local obligation when their local government has to raise taxes to improve and maintain city streets. Then the outrage will spread from areas of localized impact, that Luzatto is speaking of, to all of us. In the meantime, those republicans who proudly they have not raised taxes, and who now want to fund transportation with money taken from education, will keep earning their pensions as they slowly destroy the infrastructure of the Commonwealth of Virginia while hiding the effect from the voters.