81°
forecast

Va. Beach subsidy by taxpayers is gift that keeps on giving

Posted to: Kerry Dougherty

It's true, you know. Even the heart of a Grinch grows bigger around the holidays.

So, while reading The Pilot’s front-page story on the troubled convention business Sunday morning, it occurred to me that my negativism toward Virginia Beach’s proposed convention center headquarters hotel – a $109 million project with a $67 million public “contribution” – might be a bit selfish.

After all, why should it always be about the taxpayers? What about the city’s innkeepers? Don’t we all have a shared responsibility to see that their rooms are filled – year-round if possible?

So what if some of us are falling behind as our stagnant wages refuse to keep up with hikes in tuition, gas and trash fees. This is why God made credit cards.

You see, despite a sparkling $200 million convention center, conventioneers aren’t coming to town – unless they’re bribed with free space and swag bags full of discounts.

Naturally, the geniuses at City Hall believe the solution is to build more hotel rooms. On our dime.

According to Pilot reporters Mike Hixenbaugh and Aaron Applegate, in the past two years 14 groups paid nothing to use the convention space in return for pledging to spend a set amount on food and lodging. Yet the city (that would be you and me) spends $5.8 million a year to run the center and another mil to market it. The city spends almost $3.2 million a year in subsidies and another $15.1 million in debt service.

City honchos responded to this dreary news with a blizzard of estimated tax revenue numbers they say were generated by the visiting freeloaders.

Every expenditure seems to be chased by another in a desperate attempt to gin up room, meals and admissions taxes.

Here’s a thought: Let’s cut out the middleman, close the convention center and simply write annual checks to local businesses.

It might be cheaper.

Primary colors

Lemme get this straight. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich wants to be the leader of the free world, yet his crack campaign team couldn’t manage to comply with state rules to get him on the ballot in the Virginia Republican primary?

That’s alarming.

Candidates needed to have 10,000 valid signatures by 5 p.m. on Dec. 22 to get on the March 6 Super Tuesday ballot.

Looks like Newt didn’t make it. Neither did Rick Perry.

Perry filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday to get his name on the ballot, while Gingrich has been talking about a write-in campaign. Never mind that write-ins don’t count in Virginia primaries.

Yes, it’s true the commonwealth does require a lot of signatures. Still, it looks like Mitt Romney managed to garner the requisite number in time. So did Ron Paul.

After last week’s missed deadline, Newt’s campaign director reportedly posted his frustration on Facebook.

“Newt and I agreed that the analogy is December 1941: We have experienced an unexpected set-back, but we will re-group and re-focus with increased determination, commitment and positive action.”

Wait. Newt “agreed” that being left off the Virginia primary ballot was a lot like the attack on Pearl Harbor?

Historians. They really know how to keep everything in perspective, don’t they?

ABC

Gov. Bob McDonnell may have abandoned his quixotic quest to get the state out of the booze business, but he was right to try.

Please explain why it is the role of government to peddle alcohol to the people. Why not cigarettes? Coffee? Cinnamon buns?

Yet if there’s an upside to this Soviet-style distribution plan, it’s that the state is able to track and quantify our drinking habits, which always makes for good reading. This week, the ABC board announced that despite – or maybe because of – the lousy economy, Virginians are imbibing more than ever. In fact, liquor sales were up 17.3 percent in the 2011 fiscal year.

The best-selling bottle in Virginia? According to news reports, it was Jack Daniel’s. The top 10 included three whiskeys, four vodkas, two rums and the vile Jägermeister.

Surprisingly, tequila was not on the list. Friends, we’re clearly not drinking enough margaritas.

Cheers.

Kerry Dougherty, (757) 446-2306, kerry.dougherty@cox.net

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

MIKE BARRETT NEEDS TO GET A REAL JOB

I get so tired of Mike Barrett monoplolizing any conversatoin about the PPV ripoffs. He's obviously the only one that supports his position, so why doesn't the Pilot quit publishing his crap?

I used to enjoy reading the paper at lunch but his garbage gets tired and is the same old line of BS, as if we the people are that stupid. Like to see his tax returns and see how honest he really is.

Going to start reading MSN instead of the Pilot. Too bad, but reading his crap makes me sick to my stomach.

We do know and your right, it is our choice Mr. Barrett.

What you fail to realize is that everything is going up in cost. They don't called it a tax anymore but refer to them as a fee. Maybe you have enough money that you don't feel the crunch but most of us do. If this was such a profitable venture then the developers should be willing to fund it themselves. They would make more profit and the city would benefit by tax revenues. Seems like a win-win for everyone with little risk to citizens! Better yet, it would be better for the city since they wouldnt have to pay anything. This will be a bottomless pit since every few years they will have to change things in order to compete with other venues or to give even more away. Changes to stay competitive means more money from us.

Of course I realize it, but

Of course I realize it, but we just disagree on tactics to make things better. Those who advocate for extreme enforced austerity think they will make it better but cutting every amenity and program they think is unnecessary (except for their pet projects, of course). Others, that is, the majority, knows that to keep our best bond rating in the nation, to keep the lowest tax rate in the region, to keep the best school system, parks and recreation facilities, cultural institutions, etc. we must find new ways to generate economic activity that contributes to the commercial tax base and which keeps our real estate tax rate low. It really is that simple.

The only "we" those in charge are considering

is themselves and the poo in their pockets.

This has come down to an individuals ability to survive. "We" can't afford to carry you or your hobby ventures any longer, and "we" do not want to be a part of it.

How about this: Everyone that wants to spend their hard earned (that means they work for a living) wages to support all of you, let them be free to do so.

For those of us that choose to take care of and think for ourselves will opt out of your “we” plan.

I understand that you will have many reasons why we shouldn't allow those entitled to support their own entitlements, but the biggest reason of all is because "THEY" don't earn money.

Get YOUR hands out of OUR wallets. You aren't welcome to anything that you didn't earn.

We will just have to agree to disagree

I think this is where you may be a bit confused again. From reading past and present comments, very few on here are against economic development. Seems to me they are against development where the city takes the major risk and not the developer. With all these expensive projects some developers have become accustom to predominantly using the taxpayer as their lending institution. This practice is slowly coming to an end. The writing is already on the wall. I only speak for myself as I say build anything you want, when you want and how you want. I even hope you make a wonder profit. However, do it on your dime and with your risk, not mine.

Well, I would suggest to you

Well, I would suggest to you that exactly the same thing was said about the other PPVs I have mentioned, yet the main beneficiaries have been us, the taxpayers. If the business groups with which I am affiliated thought for one moment that the majority of risk was on the taxpayers, and that the private sector was not investing their share, we would not have recommended approval of this project. The developer in this case is taking the major risk, and in fact, even if the hotel performs much worse than expected, the effect will be that the private investors will be deprived of a return on their investment, but the public will not. Remember, most conventioneers will not stay in this hotel; the point is to attract them to Virginia Beach.

I'm confused. If most

I'm confused. If most conventioners won't stay in the convention hotel then why build it? To look at? To say we have a convention hotel? Are you saying that just the presence of a convention hotel will entice businesses and other groups to want to have their conventions in VA Bch?

Bribe "decision-makers" & "key people"

To address the question of why build a fancy and extravagant hotel when it is too small to accommodate all of the folks going to the convention?

The idea is to use the fancy hotel and other give-away perks to bribe the people who get to decide where the conventions they are running will be held. It isn't about the people attending the convention as much as bribing the people who can make the decision by pampering them during the convention, so they are treated like some type of royal or visiting dignitary.

POSH for you Elites, Motel 6 for you "spillage" people

Nobody cares where Joe Shmuckotelli stays when he has to attend the annual widget makers sales convention. In fact, that is the plan. Joe and the rest of his legions of peasant, in working class “conventioneers” are supposed to stay in the lower rent district nearby hotels. They are the intended “spillage” used to bribe the RAC members to support this boondoggle.

Ya see, ya gochur "Elites" who pick where Conventions are held - and ya gotchur "Key Note Speakers that need perks to get 'em to show up and speak. The rest of the folks? They are the "Spillage People".

That's why they get to stay at the Y - M - C - A.

Not true

The developer can go bankrupt. We the taxpayers still have to pay the bills. Lots of smoke and mirrors here.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Kerry Dougherty rss feed   


Toolbox