The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
The Army Corps of Engineers laid out its plans for restoring the Lynnhaven River on Tuesday, telling the City Council that the project would include creating artificial oyster reefs made from concrete, rebuilding wetlands, and replanting underwater grasses then seeding them with sea scallops.
The strategy, hatched after eight years of study, is expected to cost $28.5 million, with Virginia Beach paying about $10 million.
Funding is not guaranteed at the city or federal level, however. And with budgets tight, chances the project gets under way any time soon remain iffy.
Council members, without committing to the city's share of the funding, expressed support for the plan and to continuing the revival of the city's largestwaterway, on the mendafter decades of pollution, overdevelopment and other abuses.
"Thank you for your work," Mayor Will Sessoms told corps scientists and managers after their presentation Tuesday. "We look forward to seeing more good results."
Clay Bernick, the city's sustainability director, said building about 31 acres of oyster reefs in the Lynnhaven should have a major side benefit: Because oysters are natural filters of nutrients and sediments, the city hopes to get credit for reducing these pollutants in meeting stricter new guidelines for cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay.
Investing in oyster reefs, Bernick said, would save taxpayers tens of millions of dollars that otherwise would be spent on high-tech controls needed to comply with the new Bay standards.
The standards are part of a drive by President Barack Obama's administration to hasten the Bay's cleanup by requiring mid-Atlantic states to significantly reduce nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment pollution by 2017 and 2025.
The Norfolk district of the Army Corps was instructed by Congress in 1998 to study the Lynnhaven River's many aliments and recommend remedies.
The work started in 2004 and is just about wrapped up, said Jeff Strahan, a regional economist who worked on the effort.
The study cost about $3.2 million, a tab shared by the corps and the city.
It suggests installing 31 acres of concrete oyster reefs; eradicating 38 acres of lowlands covered by the invasive plant Phragmites, a type of reed, and replacing them with native wetlands; restoring 94 acres of underwater grass beds and dropping thousands of sea scallops on about 22 acres of those beds.
An earlier version of the plan recommended removing about 20 dams on the river to restore the natural rhythm of ebb and tide. But that was dropped after residents objected.
The river suffers from too much mud and silt shallowing its depths, too much bacteria tainting water quality, and too many nutrients reducing oxygen levels.
Karen Forget, executive director of Lynnhaven River Now, an environmental group, said the corps plan is a key blueprint for returning clean water and ample habitat to the waterway.
While wishing the study had not taken so long to complete, Forget said she looks forward to pushing City Hall and Congress to fully fund the restoration strategy.
"This gets us to where we need to go," she said.
Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Throwing Monies at Known Problems Without Citizen Involvement..
Feds and CoVB could throw money at LR problems and issues forever and nothing would be realized w/out involvement of system user and citizens living along the shore. The entire boating community, from trailering day-tripper to in-water moored vessels must have all anti-foulants (AF) formulated with toxic aquatic pesticides removed and replaced with clear coats or foul-release AF systems. Dry-stored vessels need no AF coatings at all. Boat yards and marinas must be zero discharge of all process wastewaters and fouled storm water, or be adequately permitted. Shore dwellers need to remove all turf grass within 100' of the water and replace with suitable vegetation not necessitating pounds of toxic pesticides, fungicides and fertilizers per lot.
All these oyster beds will
All these oyster beds will be choked from the channel dredging that public works is proposing. Trying to make a gigantic pond in to everyones personal intercoastal waterway is ridiculous and expensive.
What sense does it make that a deck needs a silt fence to be bullt to protect the water yet an excavator can destroy the bottom of the Lynnhaven by dredging and that's ok?
one hand doesn't know what the other is doing
and for the $3.2 million dollar study... one of the major areas designated on the map that they presented to council is behind Princess Anne High School in the same path where thousands of barges are going to be plowing through the river for the continuous western branch dredging plans...to be offloading muck at the Thalia mechanical dredge transfer facility...1000's of barges are expected to be com'n down the waterway...after they first dredge up the wetlands to get to the site. What's their estimated cost? Over $28 million with another $10 million coming from Va Beach taxpayers...staff has been studying this since 2004, too & recently a City appointed commission....donkey before the cart or cart before the donkey...
If the city is going to pay $10M to improve the water
why don't we first actually enforce the law that was passed long ago requiring those in the Little Neck peninsula on septic to hook up to the city sanitary sewer system (which we tax payers funded) and get rid of their septic tanks?
That's because all those rich people on the Little Neck peninsula- you know who you are - lobbied their buddies on city council and got a waiver as it would have cost them too much to connect thier estates to the vacuum lines over 400 feet away.
No policy or plan from the city council, just make rash decisions based on each project's merits.....even if new projects do go against or are counter to previous projects and decisions spend spend spend...
Beg to differ
The City Code has a mandatory connection ordinance that is being enforced city-wide including on the Little Neck Peninsula. Exemptions from the mandatory connection ordinance exist where the dwelling is too far away to reach the nearest sewer by gravity flow, which would require the homeowner to pump the sewage to the collection system.
Secondly, not a penny of taxes was used to construct the Little Neck sewer project. The Department of Public Utilities' capital improvement program is wholly funded from fees and recurring charges for sewer and water service.
Third, there is no evidence whatsoever that the septic systems in the Lynnhaven River watershed have a discernible negative impact on water quality.
....I don't know if this is evidence or not...
...Bacterial testing is done regularly in the Lynnhaven River by the VA Depart of Health, Shellfish Sanitation Division. Bacteria levels determine what areas of the river are open to shellfish harvest. Tests indicate that the Lynnhaven River is contaminated with fecal matter from humans, pets and wildlife including birds.......Seventeen overflows in 2010 produced 4,451 gallons of contaminated overflow - from the State of the River Report 2010 from Lynnhaven River Now.
Anyway - the point being made is prior problems haven't been resovled and yet we're told it took 8 years and $3.2 million dollars to come up with a study that does what....asks for more money. Real solutions are staring the City in the face, yet, it's dredge, baby, dredge!
Correct
You are correct, this is not evidence. The cited sanitary sewer overflows are most certainly not due to septic systems but to the City sewer system.
...reference was to personal septic systems.....
but anyway - we should all be on the same page - the city is spending millions on studies for 8 years and now looking for more millions, staff is hell-bent on running 1000s of barges filled with muck thru our rivers using taxpayers money to build transfer sites that the people don't want & have neglected to come up with a long term, environmental & economical plan, the people want to buy Pleasure House Point for $13 mil and preserve it..... where is all this money - why the neglect of the best way for all and the waterway? It's simply mind-boggling.
name
Calling the Lynnhaven a river is kind of a stretch, its more of tidal pond than anything else. Why would residents object to the removal of dams? Rivers usually have a source, what is the Lynnhavens? Anyone?
"restoring natural ebb and flow"...
would make the the most environmental & life long natural way to restore the water If not then the program should expand to work with the City's dredging program. "...Hydraulic dredging is potentially cheaper, cleaner, and safer, according to the USACE officials."(in ref. to another state's dredging article) City staff's intent to ONLY consider a mechanical dredge method is reckless-causing more turbidity & resuspension of the sediment, & unnatural cutting away of the channels with a longer time for the natural chain of organisms to restore themselves. Mechanical causes dbl handling of muck. A continuous, disruptive method. Broadening to hydraulic & an inwater disposal & restoration use would be a win for the people, river & environment.