The Virginian-Pilot
©
I bought my first Macintosh computer in the bookstore at Sweet Briar College, because it was the only place around to find Apple products. It was a Macintosh IIsi, because even in the early 1990s, Apple loved mixing upper- and lower-case letters.
The computer - a fat little plastic pizza box - cost the same as a used car. But it was worth it.
I'd spent the 1980s struggling with machines based on the IBM PC and its arcane commands. By comparison, the Apple was a revelation: Simple and elegant, as natural to use as a box of microchips can be.
For more than 20 years - several lifetimes in technology - my electronic world has run on successors to that Mac. Today, my music, video, Internet and telephone is all served up by one product or another designed by Apple in Cupertino, Calif.
But none of them is made there. None of them is made anywhere in America.
As exhaustive stories in The New York Times have detailed, Apple employs 43,000 people in the United States. That's terrific, a credit to the company.
But "an additional 700,000 people engineer, build and assemble iPads, iPhones and Apple's other products. But almost none of them work in the United States."
Apple's reasons for manufacturing overseas - like many companies in many industries - began with price. Labor is cheaper in nations with far lower standards of living. If Apple went to China for the same reason that Walmart makes coat-hangers there, its reasons for staying are more complicated, as The Times reported.
Factories on the scale that can build more than 100 million iPhones, iPads and iPods in a single year can be found only in the Far East, primarily in China.
Labor is certainly cheaper in China's repressive city-factories. But labor isn't that big a fraction of a gadget's cost.
More important, as The Times story makes clear, are the sheer size and centralization of the labor force, a fact that makes it fundamentally more flexible and scalable. If Apple wants to change the screen on the iPhone, it can get started the next day and soon be making them by the thousands. And that attracts suppliers from all over the world.
All that is possible because the dictators of China have made it so, because they don't bother with pesky things like freedom or worker protections. Because they throw billions of dollars and millions of people at solving problems without regard for the human, environmental or monetary costs.
Just ask the American companies now being crowded from the green energy business. China wants that industry, and it will devote every person and dollar it needs to get it.
"Last year, [Apple] conducted 229 audits," The Times reported. "There were slight improvements in some categories and the detected rate of core violations declined. However, within 93 facilities, at least half of workers exceeded the 60-hours-a-week work limit. At a similar number, employees worked more than six days a week. There were incidents of discrimination, improper safety precautions, failure to pay required overtime rates and other violations. That year, four employees were killed and 77 injured in workplace explosions."
All so I can have an iPod, and Apple can sock away more than $90 billion in cash.
It may get worse. Because of Apple's size - as well as the business of almost every other high tech company - China's manufacturing gravity is nearly inescapable. If you want to make a high-tech widget, and you want to make a lot of them, China is becoming dangerously close to the only place on Earth.
These are the kind of future-centered jobs that were supposed to allow American workers to ride to the factory in flying cars. Except now the factory is in China.
Several months before he passed away, The Times reported, President Barack Obama asked Apple founder Steve Jobs why all those jobs couldn't be in American factories.
Jobs was unequivocal. Those jobs aren't coming back, he told the president.
It's not clear which is sadder. That one of America's most innovative companies does almost all its manufacturing overseas. Or that one of America's greatest innovators couldn't see a way to change that.
Donald Luzzatto is The Pilot's editorial page editor. Email: donald.luzzatto@pilotonline.com.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
When Michael Vick's
When Michael Vick's treatment of dogs was revealed these pages were full of well expressed opinions rightly condemning it. But when the victims are human beings, Chinese workers, we see the torture and cruelty justified. Trust me, after the Chinese workers tire of this treatment they will resent for generations what was done to them. And who will get blamed, the 1% ers whose profits are fattened? And as China gets stronger we will pay the price. you can bet that'll be blamed on the Americans, and our international standing will be just dirt, for many decades before it gets forgotten.
No to Dictators _And_ Guilt
Mr. Luzzatto, there's so much ambiguity in your piece that it is hard to know what your point is.
Do you mean to suggest that we need a Chinese-style dictatorship in America, or is it merely enough that we should fear and loathe capitalism?
If it is the former, you should say so honestly.
If it is the latter, you should offer more by way of an alternative than the vague demoralization of collective guilt.
Ah, but perhaps that IS your point: to make us all feel guilty.
I don't.
John, if you can you should read the NYT article
Luzzato is spot on, but without having seen the original, it may seem a bit vague.
The article is an eyeopener.
Our lack of investment in manufacturing since Reagan, and particularly the early 90's, is coming back to haunt us big time.
Now the Chinese model is tough. The workers sleep in barracks near the plant, and are mobilized at a moments notice to produce or change production.
And all the factories for a particular manufacturing process are within blocks of one another.
We won't stand for that kind of lifestyle.
But we could have set up the supply lines and high tech manufacture if the investors in America cared more about how to make it work here rather than the easy bucks overseas.
Too late now.
Thanks: My Take...
RE: "we could have set up the supply lines and high tech manufacture if the investors in America cared more about how to make it work here rather than the easy bucks overseas."
My question to you, Mr. Rothman, is WHY should investors in America have cared more about making things work here?
The NYT piece(1) shows clearly that Chinese workers voluntarily participate in the high-tech labor market available to them. It also shows clearly that Apple takes social responsibility seriously enough to try to improve conditions for its Chinese employees.
This is a case where the best of possible worlds may not yet be good enough, but all events are trending in the right direction.
I was impressed by this passage in the NYT article: "Apple also has trained over a million workers about their rights and methods for injury and disease prevention. A few years ago, after auditors insisted on interviewing low-level factory employees, they discovered that some had been forced to pay onerous 'recruitment fees' -- which Apple classifies as involuntary labor. As of last year, the company had forced suppliers to reimburse more than $6.7 million in such charges."
Fifty or 100 years ago a company like Apple would never have been so enlightened. Progress is occurring. We should support this, not complain about it.
(1)http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/26/business/ieconomy-apples-ipad-and-the-human-costs-for-workers-in-china.html?pagewanted=1&sq=apple%20china&st=cse&scp=3
The answer to your question is to look at our economy
"…WHY should investors in America have cared more about making things work here?"
The short term profit was to move overseas.
Now some production in other countries benefit from low wages only, such as apparel.
But making high tech products such as computers and smart phones is an industry with a strong future and would have been a great asset to our economy.
We gave China our technology by assuring that the manufacture would be in their country, not ours. That they can cut glass in very special ways and assemble computers in cell phones is not tailoring shirts.
China is who undercut our solar panel industry, partly on labor and partly on the ability to R&D high tech solutions. They know that fossil fuels are going to eventually have to be replaced or at least curtailed as demand increases, supply diminishes (it is a finite resource) and air quality becomes more of an issue. (China's cities are notorious for poor air quality and they are addressing just that.)
We are now a 90% service economy buying other peoples' products and waiting tables, selling retail and providing medical service (to those who can afford it-I couldn't resist).
Why we cannot hope to get a company like Apple to relocate is that China as the complete high tech package, which takes years to establish.
Our investors sold CDO's and credit default swaps while China saw the future and they built on it.
That is why investors should have look further than the next quarter.
Windfall profit taxes
When Big Oil Companies post earnings like $13 Billion -- quarterly -- earnings, the cries and wails and pitchforks come out for revenge against those greedy companies. Where are the calls for such punitive measures here when the company of late, great "golden boy" of popular culture racks up such profits?
American Greed
Apple could just as easily make all these fantastic products in the USA. Apple fanboys have proven they will pay any price for a bite of the Apple. Every time they buy an Apple product they are contributing to the gigantic cash coffers of the Apple klan. By reducing the profit margin a couple of points or by increasing the sale price by the same couple of points, any higher cost of manufacturing in the USA, could be absorbed with little or no impact on the bottom line of a company that already has $90 billion in cash reserves. If Apple wanted to truly prove itself the great American innovator it professes to be it should tackle the problem and start building factories to make its products here in America. This would create much needed jobs here and make Apple a truly American company. I would love to see my iPod say MADE IN USA!
It is really not greed by Apple
It is more short sighted profit seeking by American manufacturers over the last 3 decades.
We could have built a similar manufacturing system, at higher pay of course, but pay is not the only issue.
Supply lines and support systems are in place in China that we could have done here.
But instead we were working on short term profits, leveraged buyouts and setting up incentives for more MBA's than engineers.
We might be the classroom example in a few years of what happens in the endgame of capitalism if a country is not careful.
The only goal for our investor classes in the last 30 years has been almost a zero sum shifting of wealth and income from the working and middle classes to the top percentiles.
And we are reaping the "benefits" of that economic system today.
You cannot maintain a stable and robust economy by pooling the wealth at the top.
The spenders of our economy have been the middle classes. They buy more, spend more and keep our economy vibrant.
Strip them of that wealth and, well…here we are.