77°
forecast

Bills tightening voting ID laws advance, despite outcry

Posted to: Elections News Politics State Government Virginia

RICHMOND

Measures aimed at tightening Virginia's election laws cleared two key legislative hurdles Tuesday over the objections of opponents who called them thinly veiled attempts to suppress minority voting rights.

In both cases, the votes broke sharply along party lines, with the General Assembly's Republican majority supporting tighter election laws and the Democratic minority opposed.

In the House of Delegates, where Republicans have a super-majority, Del. Mark Cole's HB9 won preliminary approval on nearly a straight party-line vote, 66-28. The measure provides that voters who are unable to present an approved form of identification at the polls, such as a driver's license, would have to vote with a provisional ballot, which would not be counted unless and until the voter's identity is verified.

Under current law, a voter without identification is allowed to cast a regular ballot after affirming his or her identity in a sworn statement, subject to felony penalties for lying.

In the Senate, a bill similar to Cole's, Sen. Steve Martin's SB1, won committee approval on an 8-7 party-line vote and advanced to the floor, where the two parties are split 20-20 but Republican Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling is empowered to break ties.

Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell has not yet taken a position on the legislation.

A variety of bills to tighten voting and registration procedures await consideration by the Assembly. The measures are needed to prevent voter fraud and ensure fair election results, supporters say.

Cole, R-Spotsylvania County, told the House his bill "does not in any way deny anyone the right to vote. It is intended to protect the integrity of the election process."

Democrats countered that the bill addresses a problem that doesn't exist. There is no evidence of ineligible people voting, they said.

Several opponents said the measure is reminiscent of poll taxes, literacy tests and other vestiges of Virginia's history of repressing African American voting.

Del. Algie Howell, D-Norfolk, who is African American, recalled his father being required to answer questions such as this as a condition of voting in the 1940s: "How many bubbles are there in a bar of soap?"

Earlier Tuesday, several hundred people attended a Capitol Square rally where speakers lambasted the election bills.

It is no coincidence that such measures have been put forward this year, several speakers said - a year in which the nation's first African American president is running for re-election.

"We know that these voter-suppression activities are designed with a strategic purpose in mind," Richmond Mayor Dwight Jones said. "The fact that there is a brother in the White House is just unsettling to so many people."

U.S. Rep. Bobby Scott, D-3rd District, said Virginia voters are being targeted because the commonwealth will be a battleground state in the presidential election. "Whoever wins Virginia will be very well postured to carry the entire nation," said Scott, who represents Portsmouth and parts of Norfolk and the Peninsula.

The Rev. Benjamin Chavis, former executive director of the NAACP, said the bills are aimed at Americans' most fundamental right.

"Voting suppression is democracy suppression," Chavis said. "These are arrogant bills introduced by arrogant politicians."

At the conclusion of the rally, members of the Legislative Black Caucus led the crowd to the Capitol singing, "We Shall Overcome."

Also Tuesday, another of the measures under fire by voting-rights advocates began advancing through the House. Del. Danny Marshall's bill, HB569, would require proof of citizenship - such as a birth certificate or passport - as a condition of registering to vote.

The measure drew the support of a tea party group and opposition from several organizations including the League of Women Voters and the ACLU, which see it as unnecessary.

"I do not want this intrusion into my life," said Rebecca Jaramillo of Protect Virginia's Vote. "Who are these illegal immigrants who are trying to vote and destroy America? They aren't doing it."

Marshall's bill was approved on a 4-2 party-line vote by a Republican-controlled House subcommittee.

Bill Sizemore, 804-697-1560, bill.sizemore@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

HB9

"The officer shall ask the voter to present any one of the following forms of identification: his Commonwealth of Virginia voter registration card, his social security card, his valid Virginia driver's license, or any other identification card issued by a government agency of the Commonwealth, one of its political subdivisions, or the United States; or any valid employee identification card containing a photograph of the voter and issued by an employer of the voter in the ordinary course of the employer's business."

Is anyone really trying to tell me that requiring to have any one of these IDs is onerous or suppressive? Really? Really?

What is all the fuss

If they are only asking for a Photo ID so What's all the fuss ?? No one complains to get a Photo ID for a driver's license. What about a Pass Port? No complaints there !! Food Stamps, no problem. To Vote, show some ID...Big out cry !! Why..... Constitution, Amendment XIV says " All Persons born or naturalized in the US and subject to the jurisdiction ba ba ba ba ba"allows Citizens the "Right" to Vote, which was ratified July 9 1868. This my Point - In 1868, Photo ID to prevent fraud was not available as it is today. What's the big deal? Finger printing maybe a bit much to ask, be lucky they are not asking for a Retina scan or a drop of blood for a DNA test...Photo ID is a safe way to insure the person who is voting is la jit.

These are bills introduced by legal voters

Wanting voter fraud to stop.

If you don't like it, too bad.

You'd have to demonstrate

You'd have to demonstrate that voter fraud exists to a degree to balnce those who will be denied thier right to vote by this bill? Oh wait, there is no such voter fraud. This bill is just red meat for low information GOPers. It is a campaign ad and an effort at voter suppression. Nothing more. But GOPers like it when less poor people vote. It is a win win for the unAmerican GOPers in our midst.

You Have To Demonstrate This Requiring Some Form of ID

Descriminates against the poor, the old, students, minorites, etc. You can't, why, because the only argument against it is based on hyberbolic screams that this is racially motivated. As a Hispanic I am fully supportive of this effort.

Here's an idea

Biometrics.

With some exceptions, we all have fingerprints, right? And each one is unique, right? So how about providing a fingerprint when registering to vote, and again when voting to verify ID? No cost to the voter, and would prevent fraud and multiple voting.

As for the exceptions, then there would need to be an alternative method used.

Sorry for the double post,

Sorry for the double post, don't know what happened, only submitted once.

Here's an idea

Biometrics.

With some exceptions, we all have fingerprints, right? And each one is unique, right? So how about providing a fingerprint when registering to vote, and again when voting to verify ID? No cost to the voter, and would prevent fraud and multiple voting.

As for the exceptions, then there would need to be an alternative method used.

There are so many questions to ask-

1) What do you have to hide by not showing an ID? This creates suspension & an ID should carried anyway.
2) Why give up your right for what had to be fought for? In the past Female Americans and African Americans were not given the right to vote.
3) Have you seen how & what other countries go through when voting? The corrupt voting & the violence. You don't realize that corrupt voting could happen?
4) Why all of suddent this is a issue? For as long as I have had to vote I have had to pull out my ID and don't give it a second thought.
5) What is it following the laws, or rules?
6) Does it always have to be a race issue? It's a district issue, shouldn't be voting multi districts. Which brings you back the corrupt voting issue.

prove that fraud and

prove that fraud and corruption exists to the degree that the down side of this bill disenfranchising the least among us is worth preventing the fraud. You can't do it. No such fraud exists. This bill is just campaign propaganda for GOPers.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Elections rss feed    News rss feed    Politics rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners