77°
forecast

Military Affects All

Many people in Hampton Roads have ties to the military. It is a big part of our region and economy. There are many military issues that affect us and need to be discussed. Fred Metz plans to talk about those issues in this blog. He is retired from the Navy but continues to be involved with the active forces, city governments as well as the retired community.

DOD Budget--Big Picture??

DOD Budget—Big Picture??;  When the President and the Secretary of Defense outlined the Nations new Strategy that would guide the future of American forces on 5 January, many questions were left unanswered. The specifics of the $480 Billion cut over 10 years will be answered soon. (Secretary Panetta is scheduled to release the first details on January 26 and the complete budget on 6 February) It is easy to discuss how the pending cuts will affect local interest, but it is extremely important to ask the ‘Big’ question ‘How will the Strategy effect the Military’s capability to defend the Nation?’ The Strategy focuses on the Asia-Pacific, reduces ground forces, cancels some programs and slows other programs. Various Congressmen have expressed reservations with the new strategy.

The Daily Press reported Rep Randy Forbes comments “He agreed that U.S. forces should pay more attention to China---but he suggested that the administration’s review was to shallow and based on generalities. ---Unfortunately, this review dangerously fails to identify risks assumed by drastic budget cuts.---This laundry list of vague ‘priorities’ is not a strategy for superiority.  It is instead a menu for mediocrity.” The USA Today reported Rep Buck McKeon, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee concern, “This is a lead-from behind strategy for a left behind America---The president has packaged our retreat from the world in the guise of a new strategy to mask his divestment of our military and national defense.” There are many who say the cuts should be bigger, congress will soon have the opportunity to evaluate both sides of the concerns.  The deputy undersecretary of defense for strategy, plans and forces, Kathleen Hicks, said (in American Forces Press, 10 Jan) “The biggest risk of any strategy is uncertainty of the future---we don’t know exactly where threats will emerge---we don’t know where opportunities will emerge and whether we will be able to see them in time to take advantage of them--- we think we have brought down risk that we had at the highest levels of conflict.” There will be interesting hearings starting in February when the DOD budget is reviewed.

Congress will need to evaluate many uncertainties that are mentioned in the press daily.  The tensions with Iran, unrest in Syria and uncertainties in Egypt and Libya. We continually read of the Military growth of China. We can’t forget Russia; last week Russian Press reported a Russian Task Force led by the aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov visited the Syrian port of Tartus. Russia has a major modernization program of major Capital ships that is scheduled to be complete by 2020.

In addition to the Strategy the budget will address many ‘People ‘ issues, TRICARE and retirement. I have been involved in cuts in the past that have not been obvious until after the fact. The cuts in operation, training and maintenance money, will have a big impact on the forces ability to accomplish their mission.

By the Way---Yesterday the Washington Times reported “New Navy budget may risk plans for Carriers”. The article discussed an unconfirmed report of a possible reduction in the number of carriers and a delay in the construction from 5 to 7 years. Nothing confirmed ‘rumors’ but any change in the carrier force will have an impact on the region.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Work smarter to afford necessities

Every week we see something like this:

Fed. Times-1/23/12
DOD Info Tech: 772 data centers, 15,000 networks, 70,000 servers, 7 million IT devices and 5,000 applications. It serves 3 million users and has an IT staff of 90,000 employees.

Obama officials agree this $39B infrastructure is far bigger and costlier than necessary. Progress will be hampered as long as each service and DoD agency runs IT operations independent of others. Recognizing this, the Def. Business Board is urging SECDEF to empower the CIO to integrate IT plans.

DoD employees view themselves as unique components within the dept. That sense of identity and mission makes sense for many things those agencies do, but not for running an email service or maintaining a network.

why are we borowing money from China in the first place if we

see them as a near-term threat? The latest monthly GDP numbers I saw had China with a $17B surplus while we were at a $40B deficit. Many countries we consider allies are losing money each month, while China is gaining money to build their aresenals. Monetarily, we are weak. Shortly, we will get O's vision that we are too strong and can "afford" to throttle back on defense. A huge mistake, but its coming.

DOD has been asked how will we maintain sea-lanes when we have a temp reduction of carriers from 11 to 10. Now we find that it might be perminent? That does not provide the ability to sustain the 6 +2 desire in CBG. Our ships will deteriate because we cannot take them off line for maintenance. We will be replacing entire fleets. To costly.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

Toolbox