Judge fight halts Senate action, threatens to shutdown legislature
Partisan gridlock over appointing two former legislators to state courts halted action in the Senate Tuesday and left the General Assembly in limbo over whether it could conduct business in the coming days.
While the issue hinged on a self-imposed deadline and arcane legislative procedures, the judge flap is the latest sign of ongoing friction between Democrats and the Republican majority in the Senate split 20-20 between the parties.
Lawmakers planned to vote today on reappointing a slate of judges to benches around the state
But Democrats moved to block that because the list includes two candidate who aren't sitting judges, former Dels. Clifford "Clay" Athey, R-Front Royal, and Clarence "Bud" Phillips, D-Dickenson County.
Although both have the seal of approval of the Senate Courts of Justice Committee, Democrats said they were working on the notion they had an agreement with Republicans to vote only on reappointments now, leaving the election of new judges for later.
The stalemate left the Senate, and possibly the House of Delegates, unable to take up other affairs because the chambers are under a continuing order preventing other action until the judge impasse is settled.
And since the election of judges isn't something Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling can use his tiebreaking vote to settle, business in the legislature could remain on hold for days if lawmakers don't reach compromise.
As the debate wore on Tuesday, leaders from both parties faulted the other side for the situation.
Senate Majority Leader Tommy Norment, R-James City County, accused Democrats of "partisan political extortion," saying they are willing to shut down the Senate and harm judges' careers to demonstrate their might.
His Democratic counterpart, Sen. Richard Saslaw of Fairfax County, argued the opposite, suggesting Republican rigidity is to blame.
"We're not holidng it up," he said. "Their refusal, just for two names, they're willing to shut the entire Genral Assembly down."
COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
See what happens when you have
See what happens when you have a Senate of 20/20 (split even between Rs and Ds) and no one on the R side thinks sharing a little control would be a good thing. There will be issues like this and at that point the Dems gotta do what the Dems gotta do.
A little Senate sharing of the important committees among the Republicans could have gone a long way. Someone said 'there are only 40 Senators and they're split down the middle.' Sounds like a reason to share some of the control to me. After all, Mr. Bolling isn't a Senator. The Republicans have brought this on themselves.