The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
When environmentalists published their first report on conditions in the Lynnhaven River, 1 percent of the waterway met state health standards. The rest was closed to shellfish harvests due to unsafe bacteria levels.
That was in 2005.
Thursday night, the same advocates celebrated that 42 percent of the Lynnhaven is clean enough to meet those standards and again allow oyster and clam fishing.
Karen Forget, executive director of the environmental group Lynnhaven River Now, read a quote from a fisherman in a 1986 story in The Virginian-Pilot about the fate of the river: "I think the hope of the Lynnhaven is almost gone."
Forget then looked up at the crowd assembled before her at Steinhilber's restaurant and grinned, "Boy, am I glad he was wrong."
In its latest report on ecological conditions in 2011, the group gave the river an overall grade of B, the same as the year before. But much has changed, and yet other things remain the same.
That 1986 story listed two of the same big problems that plague the Lynnhaven today: too many lawn fertilizers and chemicals washing into the river, and too much contaminated stormwater hurting water quality.
Other pollutants have been corrected or at least addressed, including sewage from boats (the Lynnhaven now is a no-discharge zone), leaking septic tanks (the city has spent more than $70 million since 2003 to upgrade sewage systems and do away with septic tanks), and sediment and erosion from construction sites (not much development is going on today compared with the 1980s, and inspection programs have helped reduce such dirty runoff).
Lynnhaven River Now has been active for 10 years and has forged partnerships with the city, other environmental groups and the Army Corps of Engineers, which is helping to rebuild oyster reefs and is committed to doing more to restore the Lynnhaven.
One of the group's organizers, Harry Lester, raised a glass of red wine Thursday night and thanked those in attendance for helping turn the tide.
"Big news, folks," Lester said, "the Lynnhaven River is cleaner than it's ever been, and we've been at this for 10 years."
Afterward, Forget conceded that the group had "picked the lowest hanging fruit" over the past decade and now must dig into the bigger, vexing problems if full restoration is to be achieved.
She noted how Virginia Beach has spent more than $60 million to better control stormwater runoff but only 19 percent of the watershed receives some form of stormwater management.
"We're just scratching the surface," she said.
Water quality still is too cloudy to let underwater grasses grow. The grasses breathe oxygen into the water and provide habitat for fish and crabs. Just 6 acres of grass beds could be found in the Lynnhaven in 2011, and the group's goal is 175 acres.
But as the party continued and attendees slurped plate after plate of raw oysters pulled from the river, few were thinking about the slog ahead.
Instead, it was a night to remember how far they had come.
Scott Harper, 757-446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Establish an Environmental Protection Overlay District and Act
The Overlay District approach seems to work for new developments and malarky such as town center and Laskin road, so why not the same action for the LRiver and properties lying in the watershed & along the river's shore. What would this mean? Designated properties would be visited by a cadre of involved partners w/specific recommendations made. Those recommeded actions would be offset by loans/grants issued by the CoVB under this approach. Additional taxes would not be part of the deal, and the CoVB would be tasked with seeking those funds since it allowed the fate of the River to begin with. Further actions: prohibit anti-foulant boat coatings with heavy meatals (copper), address and end wastewaters from marinas and boat yards. Act BIG or go home.
City should clean up their act first!
New home or renovation? You'll find inspectors, orange silt fences, and the mandatory mulch beds that flow into the waterway with each high tide. Then look across the street and there's the City's huge concrete drainage pipes pouring into the channels. Half of them stuffed full of muck. Half broken...but all pouring garbage into the waterways with each rainstorm. But, wait, spend millions on studies and committees. Ask for mo money money from the taxpayer and donations from the people. Where's that storm water fee going these days? City needs to do their job 1st.
...working together?
the recent $3.2 mil $ spent by the USACE since 2004 to study the Lynnhaven, City's Public Works depart studying dredging since 2004, Citizen's desire to purchase Pleasure House Point, & Council's Beaches & Waterways Commission study...all revolve around the restoration of the Lynnhaven waterway.
"Just 6 acres of grass beds could be found in the Lynnhaven in 2011, and the group's goal is 175 acres"
Time after time the need is brought up & no solutions. The creation of inwater disposal areas for dredged spoils & the creation & restoration of oyster beds & saltwater grasses is brought up -then tabled & put on the back burner. Instead...the City has decided to roter rooter thru these sensitive areas & haul barges & trucks thru our city....
...an environmentally friendly solution
Hydraulic dredging is potentially cheaper, cleaner, and safer, according to the USACE officials."(in ref. to another state's dredging article) City staff's intent to ONLY consider a mechanical dredge method is reckless-causing more turbidity & resuspension of the sediment, & unnatural cutting away of the channels with a longer time for the natural chain of organisms to restore themselves. Mechanical causes dbl handling of muck. A continuous, disruptive method. Broadening to hydraulic & an inwater disposal & restoration use would be a win for the people, river & environment.
Thanks to LRNow for helping protect Pleasure House Point too!
Without LRNow's critical help, we might not be having the conversation about Pleasure House Point to:
Establish, restore and protect Pleasure House Point for public access as open space, an environmental learning and research center.
* Model of sustainable facility
* Wildlife refuge & rehab center
* Educational & research center
* Part of the Lynnhaven River Blueway
* Consortium of public & private entities
* Central core for features unique to the Chesapeake Bay
* Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail
* Leader in educational programs for disabled children & adults
You can find out more about what LRNow did to help preserve Pleasure House Point at http://www.savephp.org
Why not a win for all...
With hundreds of thousands of ALL taxpayer's $$$ being spent on the mechanical dredging of the Lynnhaven and the estimate of over $28 Mil $ by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, it would seem logical to work with VMRC and environmental agencies like the CBF to use the spoils, PHP and the nearby areas to become a role model and rebuild habitats, salt marshes and oyster beds. This is a "living" plan for the future of the Lynnhaven instead of the quick fix proposed by Public Works for the benefit of a few. Why not a win for ALL the people of Virginia Beach and the waterway? It is unfathomable to put thousands of barges years after year on the waterway and run thousands of tandem trucks thru neighborhoods when a better solution is possible.