80°
forecast

McDonnell targets Virginia background checks for guns

Posted to: News Politics State Government Virginia

RICHMOND

Gov. Bob McDonnell said if it's legally feasible, he'd support doing away with Virginia's 22-year-old criminal background check program for firearms purchases in favor of a federal system that also screens prospective gun buyers for eligibility to obtain weapons.

Gun rights groups have pressed the McDonnell administration on the issue, calling for an end to the Virginia Firearms Transaction Program, a state police-administered system for checking the criminal history of potential purchasers. Supporters of the state program say it's an additional safeguard to ensure state gun laws are upheld and attempts to illegally purchase weapons are investigated by local authorities.

Among those lobbying the governor is the National Rifle Association.

Officials with the gun lobby consider the state system unnecessary because of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, which was established in 1998.

They note that dozens of states rely solely on the federal system and point to Delaware's recent decision to end its state background checks.

Under the current process in Virginia, potential gun buyers are run through state and federal checks. The scans look for records that would prohibit a purchase - things such as a criminal history, residency status in the country, drug offenses, a dishonorable military discharge, and mental health adjudications.

While there is much overlap between the two programs, state police officials have cautioned that current gun restrictions unique to Virginia might not block a sale if the federal system were the only screening method in place.

That's one reason gun control advocates oppose efforts to undo the Virginia program.

In a recent interview, McDonnell said his administration continues to evaluate whether there's a way to ensure that all of the state restrictions could be included in a national check.

The governor said if that can be done, "then we ought to get rid of it and only have one. I fully subscribe to that." McDonnell didn't say how soon that could be achieved or when his staff will conclude its review.

To make it happen, several differences between the two background check systems would need to be reconciled.

State police officials say Virginia rules for protective orders apply to more family situations than federal standards. They note that Virginia's drug policy disqualifies buyers for longer periods of time, and that rules also differ on foreign-born purchasers.

Virginia law blocks people with juvenile felony convictions from obtaining a weapon, but the state severely limits access to state juvenile criminal records, so information about youthful felonies doesn't appear in federal background checks.

A possible solution to that has been offered by Chesapeake Del. John Cosgrove, a Republican who previously filed legislation to allow juvenile records to be shared with the U.S. attorney general.

Although his bill failed, Cosgrove said he plans to reintroduce it in the legislative session that begins Jan. 11 as a vehicle to create uniformity between that aspect of state policy and the federal background check system.

Like McDonnell, Cosgrove supports the idea of exclusively using the federal background check program if a firm link between Virginia gun laws and the federal system can be established.

Other differences between the state and federal systems involve how they view mental health treatment. Both bar those who have been involuntarily committed from purchasing guns.

Virginia law also specifies that someone evaluated under a temporary detention order who then enters voluntary treatment would be barred from purchasing a weapon - a nod to Virginia Tech gunman Seung-Hui Cho's history with the mental health system.

In addition, the federal system doesn't limit handgun purchases to one a month, as Virginia law does.

Virginia's background check system is the first of its type in the nation, but in recent years it has been ridiculed by gun buyers who complain about the slow processing times and the $2 fee they are charged.

State Police attribute any delays to a growing number of requests for checks as staff assigned to the task has shrunk.

Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

 

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Since anybody can get a gun,

Since anybody can get a gun, why bother with background checks at all?

I don't want to take away your right to own a gun

I do't want to take away your right to own a gun, but what I don't understand is just how many guns does it take to satisify your second amendment needs?

# of Guns

As many as I deem necessary to defend myself for all enemy foreign and domestic.

Rights are not needs; needs

Rights are not needs; needs are not rights. As Americans we have the freedom to have many guns, or none. Why does this bother you?

i understand

I understand the right (freedom, want) to own a gun to protect your home, but I do not understand the WANT to own a weapons arsenal.

There is also a difference between want and need.

In my opinion, I don't see the need to own multiuple weapons. In my oppinion it reaks of insecurity. That's my thoughts.

Who "needs" 5 cars and a million dollar house?

What I choose to legally spend my money on is my business. I have 20+ guns. The majority of them are for hunting use only. I have 4 shotguns. First one shoots small shot (for squirrels and turkeys) extremely well, second one shoots buckshot, the third is a slug gun, and the last one is a youth model 20 gauge my dad bought me. Same goes for my rifles. They all have different purposes, and sentimental value. Protection is not the only reason the majority of people own guns.

Gertz Point: Perhaps the late Zell Miller said it best...

...the late Zell Miller, former Democrat U.S. Senator and Democrat Governor of Georgia in 2002: "I've got more guns than I need, but not as many as I want."

did he say why he made such a statement?

Becaue it really doesn't make any sense.

Ok, will someone tell me why

Ok, will someone tell me why Republicans want to make buying a gun easier, while at same time making casting a vote (for Democratic leaning voters) harder?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    Politics rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners