80°
forecast

Mixed reactions greet Rigell after switch on tax pledge

Posted to: Elections Federal Government News Politics Virginia

U.S. Rep. Scott Rigell's decision to no longer stand by a pledge never to vote for a tax increase is drawing a mixed reaction from his supporters and the anti-tax tea party movement, but many feel his stance will not be a major blow to his re-election effort.

"He's going against the will of the tea party. I think it's a bold step," said Virginia Beach Mayor Will Sessoms, a Republican supporter whose city makes up most of the state's 2nd Congressional District. "It will hurt him with the far right, but I have great faith that he can explain why he's done it."

Rigell said last week he can no longer abide by the Americans for Tax Reform pledge to oppose any effort to raise income tax rates or to reduce or eliminate any tax deductions or credits unless those increases are matched dollar for dollar with tax cuts in other areas.

Rigell said solving the nation's budget imbalance, which is adding trillions to the national debt, will require new revenue as well as cutting expenses, reducing regulations to promote economic growth, and boosting energy exploration.

Dave Donis, chairman of the Hampton Roads Tea Party, said the group has been critical of Rigell - in particular, for voting last summer to raise the debt ceiling as part of a deal to cut the budget deficit by $2 trillion over a decade.

But Donis, who met with Rigell on Friday, said the congressman has told tea party activists that by setting aside the pledge he can support eliminating tax subsidies for oil companies and some agricultural interests.

"I'm not giving him a hard time if that's what he's going to do," Donis said. "I don't think Scott is going to pay a big price for that.... Our concern is they are going to start raising revenue without making any real cuts."

Longtime GOP activist Kenny Golden, an unsuccessful candidate against Rigell in 2010, said Rigell won't get off too easy.

"That just doesn't sound right," Golden said. "I don't see how he can go back on a pledge like that. I know a lot of tea party people who are disappointed with him."

Rigell, who is seeking a second two-year term in the November election, argues that federal spending accounts for about 24 percent of the country's gross domestic product while Washington is taking in about 15 percent of GDP as revenue - the rest is covered by borrowing money. The right balance, he said, should be about 19 percent for both spending and revenue.

"I have to say this has been a personal journey of mine for several months," Rigell said Monday during a meeting with The Virginian-Pilot's editorial board.

Grover Norquist, leader of the Washington-based Americans For Tax Reform and the outspoken enforcer of the promise, said in an email that Rigell can't simply disavow himself.

"The pledge is taken by someone running for the House or Senate and is good as long as that person is in the House or Senate," he wrote. "The written promise is to the people of Virginia in this case."

Norquist argued that with 238 of the 435 members of the House having signed the pledge - including the House GOP leaders - no bill that includes a tax increase will ever come up for a vote under the current Congress.

Rigell said he's not lobbying others to disavow the pledge but adds that something has to change if lawmakers are going to reach an agreement to solve the country's fiscal crisis.

"I've seen nothing that would indicate we are any closer to having a definitive resolution to our fiscal challenges that we were a year ago," he said. "Where is the basis for that hope? I don't see it."

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Liar and he will be ousted next time.

Okay since I keep getting quoted that taxes are lower than they were in 1950, I can't dispute a "clipping" of information. Now show me where overall taxation was lower in 1950 and that includes everything:

State, local, Federal and all the other tack on taxes that have been added since.......like tax in cigarettes and so forth

Sick of the half truths!

Taxes

Federal taxes are at their lowest level in more than 60 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

The last year in which revenues were lower was 1950, according to the Office of Management and Budget.

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/31/are-taxes-in-the-u-s-high-or-low/

Including everything

Federal, state and local income taxes consumed 9.2% of all personal income in 2009, the lowest rate since 1950, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reports.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/taxes/2010-05-10-taxes_N.htm?csp=34&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+usatoday-NewsTopStories+%28News+-+Top+Stories%29

Cut taxes, raise taxes, Cut spending?

Questions for GOP supporters, if solution is to cut and balance budget at all costs, are you willing to except U.S. unemployment figures of twenty percent, how about twenty-five percent? Would you except further (thirty / forty percent) decreases in real estate values across the nation? Blame Obama, the House, the Senate. Blame GOP or Dem's. History has proven drastic cuts in spending during recessions can produce catastrophic results.

Vulture Capitalism

Yes, many GOP adherents accept the shock and awe ideology put forth by Milton Friedman and his Chicago Boys. That is, every crisis is an opportunity to push forth their zany ideas about free market capitalism (read vulture capitalism) and globalization. That is their strategy today; even though it was their ideas, applied in the Bush administration that created the mess we were in, they have seized on the crisis they themselves created to push for more of the same. Why? Because they serve the corporate interests who benefit from the global stream of capital, and who could care less about our workforce or the prosperity of our citizens on mainstreet. Gingrich/Romney, makes no difference, the Party is for the 1% who espouse this view.

Q&A

Q. "Are [Republicans] willing to except U.S. unemployment figures of twenty percent, how about twenty-five percent?

A. Yes, if it will mean President Obama is not re-elected. That's the only job in America they care about.

Scott Rigell

Scott Rigell is NOTHING but a TURNCOAT Politician.. One more STINKING RAT that needs to leave Office....

Hypocrite

Says someone with his lips firmly planted on the federal teet.

Bold Smart Move!

This is exactly why the Tea Party has no real candidate. Too far right! We need taxes (revenue) to help balance the budget and bring down spending. How are else are we to do it? Cuts alone can't get us ther! And, who do the center voters favor?

When a nations economy only relies of a few goods and services, they open themselves to perodic crashes.

Future post mortem historians will reveal that the cart was before the horse with Globalsim. Did you notice that England opted out of the latest EURO MerCosey show? If I see them kiss again, I'm going to need a barf bag!!!

Comment deleted

Comment removed for rules violation. Reason: Post in ALL CAPS or bold

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Elections rss feed    Federal Government rss feed    News rss feed    Politics rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners