The Virginian-Pilot
©
Scott Rigell found himself in unusual company for a freshman congressman Monday: breakfasting in Omaha with billionaire investor Warren Buffett and discussing how to fix the country's debt crisis.
But perhaps even more unexpected was Rigell's announcement later that day that in his re-election campaign, he'll no longer stand by a pledge never to vote for a tax increase.
Rigell, a Republican from Virginia Beach, said after careful analysis he's come to the realization that some sort of revenue increase will be needed as part of federal budget reform, as well as cuts in spending, lowering of the national debt and reducing regulation to expand business and energy production.
"Everything should be on the table," he said.
Rigell made the comments not long after meeting with Buffett, who praised the congressman's gesture of returning a portion of his federal salary to help pay down the national debt. The two had corresponded recently after Buffett told Time magazine he would match any money Republican members of Congress personally paid to reduce the debt. Rigell, who is independently wealthy, already was donating 15 percent of his approximately $174,000 federal salary and contacted Buffett.
Buffett said Monday that elected leaders, Democrats and Republicans, have to compromise on the spending and revenue issues if they ever hope to solve the debt crisis.
"There has to be substantial give in both areas," he said. "The hard part is getting someone to give in first."
The no-tax pledge, promoted by Grover Norquist of the group Americans for Tax Reform, has been adopted by scores of state and national politicians.
Rigell said the root of his change of position is the assumption that the federal spending has historically amounted to about 19 percent of the country's gross domestic product. Today, it's more than 24 percent.
Compounding the problem, Rigell has said, is that the government is taking in only about 15 percent of GDP as revenue - the rest is added to the national debt.
Rigell said he's come to believe that even if the federal government's spending as a share of GDP is cut to 19 or 20 percent, new economic growth alone won't generate enough money to pay for necessary government services. Some kind of new revenue is needed.
"I'm finding it increasingly more difficult to reconcile with the ATR pledge," he said.
Rigell also acknowledged that he's finding more in common with U.S. Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, a Democrat who has been spearheading an effort to adopt a broad budget plan that includes deep spending cuts, revamping entitlement programs and increasing revenues.
Warner came to Virginia Beach on Monday to stump for Rigell's opponent, Democrat Paul Hirschbiel.
Bill Bartel, 757-446-2398, bill.bartel@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
I have to ask..
is there a tax break to the Congressman for his 15% return to the Treasury? It certainly appears to be charity, after all. Tax hikes will not pay down a DIME on the deficits or accrued debt. The Congress and WH occupier will just view more revenue as more to spend. Until we impose term limits on these clowns we elect, we will continue to dig our own financial grave. I think Rigell just might have cost himself re-election. Embracing a true hypocrite of Buffett's stripe is not going to endear him to anyone other than the alleged 'guilty rich' that Buffett is trying to pass himself off as.
#9
What was really funny last night in the State of the Union speech was the comment Obama made that said, now that we are out of Iraq, we should take half that funding and spend it on "at home nation building and the other half to pay down the debt". Of course he got a loud cheer from his democrat lemmings.
Libs on this forum have beaten the drum that those two wars were unfunded wars paid for with borrowed money. If true, I wonder how it works that you can borrow money to pay down debt?
Or borrow...
money to pay for health care, or the welfare state, the every day bills of government, etc.
Excited About ThisOur Congressman!
I am an independent, and strive to vote for the person-- not the party. I tend to lean liberal on a lot of social issues, but right now our priority needs to be filling Congress and the White House with smart men and women who know how to create success and how to make our government work better. I believe that Congressman Rigell can contribute to that-- and his willingness to stand up to the bullying of Grover Norquist and look at all solutions just reinforces my decision to return him to Washington for us.
Do your research first
Rep. Rigell tends to lean way to the right on a lot of social issues.
Democrats/liberals are the worst when it comes to not paying up
A response to the Tue, 01/24/2012 at 8:24 pm. You're kidding right??
Your God, your hero, your idol,the man you call your president is letting George Seros and Warren Buffet and the CEO from GE and many of very rich democrats get away with paying little or no taxes at all,and they are not Republicans. Tax breaks for the Rich has been the only talking point the liberal/democrats can talk about and they still has not proven their case. Democrats want everyone else to pay up, while they sit back and talk the talk. 2010 Rommney gave over 3 million dollars in charity, Biden gave a whopping $5,350,Obama gave $60,307.
Tue, 01/24/2012 at 8:24 pm need to preach to the very rich democrats/liberals about their tax breaks.
Well
Well, as I recall, president of US only makes about 200,000 a year. So that's about 25% of his salary. The 3 million is about 5% of Romney's income.
#6
Since 2001, the presidental salary is $400,000 per year.
Democrats/liberals are the worst when it comes to not paying up
A response to the Tue, 01/24/2012 at 8:24 pm. You're kidding right??
Your God, your hero, your idol,the man you call your president is letting George Seros and Warren Buffet and the CEO from GE and many of very rich democrats get away with paying little or no taxes at all,and they are not Republicans. Tax breaks for the Rich has been the only talking point the liberal/democrats can talk about and they still has not proven their case. Democrats want everyone else to pay up, while they sit back and talk the talk. 2010 Rommney gave over 3 million dollars in charity, Biden gave a whopping $5,350,Obama gave $60,307.
Tue, 01/24/2012 at 8:24 pm need to preach to the very rich democrats/liberals about their tax breaks.
Gosh, Rigell is starting to
Gosh, Rigell is starting to sound a lot like Glenn Nye! I guess that he has finally figured out that all of that government spending that he campaigned against actually puts people in his district to work. (so they can buy a car from him)