The Virginian-Pilot
©
With more than 81,000 active-duty Navy sailors in Hampton Roads who rely on the transportation network to get to work, the commander of the Navy’s mid-Atlantic region told regional leaders Thursday that improvements must be made to reduce congestion and increase mobility.
“In order to do what we need to do in this area, we need to have a reliable, efficient transportation system,” Rear Adm. T.G. Alexander told the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization. “We want to grow our presence here if the opportunity presents itself; we don’t want to go anywhere else.” Alexander said reliable transportation is “a mission-readiness issue for us.”
He said the Navy fully supports expanding the Midtown Tunnel, upgrading Dominion Boulevard in Chesapeake, expanding the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel, building another harbor crossing known as the Patriots Crossing, widening Interstate 64 from the Peninsula to Richmond, expanding light rail to Norfolk Naval Station and to Virginia Beach, and establishing a regional fast ferry service.
“Today is when we begin preparing for the future,” he said.
Alexander said improving transportation isn’t just the responsibility of local leaders, but also Navy personnel. He said a culture change from the car to transit is necessary.
“A lot of sailors like to drive their own cars and are willing to sit in traffic to do that, which boggles my mind,” he said. “We need to adopt some new behaviors.”
Recognizing the enormity of the needs and the scarcity of dollars, the TPO on Thursday recommended three projects to the state that should be considered for future public-private partnerships: The proposed Patriots Crossing, an expansion of the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel, and improvements to I-264 in Virginia Beach since the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt is unlikely to ever get approved.
While it has long been assumed that the tunnel projects would require a private partner and tolls, it’s the first time I-264 has been considered for such an approach. The improvements could include rebuilt interchanges and added capacity, which, because of surrounding development, may not mean widening but possibly double decking.
Dwight Farmer, the TPO’s executive director, said 250,000 to 300,000 vehicles use some portions of that stretch of highway daily. Traditionally, these projects require tolls to cover the debt and pay the private developers. Already in Hampton Roads, the planned Midtown Tunnel expansion is a public-private venture with tolls, and the rebuilding of U.S. 460 is working through the public-private process now.
The TPO staff also will consider adding to the list an expansion of light rail into Virginia Beach and a dedicated truck route in Suffolk through the CenterPoint warehouse/distribution center from Kenyon to Holland roads.
Philip Shucet, Hampton Roads Transit president and CEO, noted that, in the end, the private sector ultimately will determine which projects are viable as public-private ventures.
In other business, the TPO:
- Amended its Transportation Improvement Program to include work associated with the Midtown Tunnel expansion project. Portsmouth City Councilman Stephen Heretick cast the only dissenting vote, saying the tolls on the crossings will substantially disadvantage his city.
- Approved its 2034 Long-Range Transportation Plan, a blueprint for transportation development for the next 20 years. It includes 90 projects that range from planning to construction, at an estimated cost of $7 billion. It includes widening I-64 on the Peninsula and rebuilding U.S. 460. It also includes studies for the Patriots Crossing bridge and tunnel project across the harbor, expansions to the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel and light rail, and the introduction of higher-speed passenger rail.
Debbie Messina, 757-446-2588, debbie.messina@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Once upon a time in the Navy
E-3 and below were not allowed to park on base. They either lived in barracks if they were in shore billets or lived on the ship. That alone would reduce the traffic in a major way, alleviate the massive parking problems on base, and provide additional motivation for sailors to study and advance to E-4.
Military Commuter Survey
I wish they would've mentioned the survey, these all seem like great ideas but they'd be heard better if people listed them in this: http://www.hrtpo.org/MilitaryCommuterSurvey.asp
NAVSTA norva needs to do more
Ever since Gate 3 was closed after Gate 3A modernization was completed, I-564W has been a parking lot every morning. That backup stretches all the way back beyond 64W at Tidewater Dr sometimes. And it's all because 2 of the 3 lanes that cross under the runway are lining up for Gate 3A. Once you pass the Gate 3A off-ramp, it takes no time at all to reach Gates 1 & 2.
Adding another lane under the runway seems like an impractical option due to having to close the runway for a time. So we need a way to move that traffic quicker. Here it is. Do the force protection modernization to Gate 3 and re-open it. That's certainly a cheaper option to move traffic than many of the other projects that we(VA) can't afford yet.
Exactly!
I used to take gate 3 in every morning and reopening that would immediately knock out the 564 backup, especially now that hundreds of jobs have been added on the air station side again. Opening 3 would also alleviate a lot of cross-base traffic from 4 and 22.
here's
another, take the hov lane running from the base on 564 and make it incoming in the a.m., it's done in other places, and it works, is cheaper than building new lanes, they already do it at the gates so extend it futher from the base, cones or some temporary physical barrier would have to be utilized, but this would work.
I would ride light rail...
Carpooling, while in theory, is a good idea; for many sailors and civilians who work on the bases, our work hours are not set; we work irregular hours, overtime, etc., so it is not practicle.
If there was a reasonably priced light rail system with a regularly set schedule that came all the way down to Great Bridge or Edinburgh areas and went to Naval Station; I would ride it!
Originally a federal mandate
Knowing federal funding would be such a controversial issue, President Eisenhower called creating the Interstate Highway System an important defense issue. Since it was during the Cold War, it was an easy sell this way. The system came in WAY over budget and took over 30 years to build. Problem is, somehow no one thought about funding the maintenance of it. It's no surprise the Navy thinks of transportation issues as extremely important. The only surprise is no one else in the military has come out to state this earlier.
The only way our interstates are going to get the funding for maintenance they need is with another powerful federal mandate like the one that created them.
fic volume.Military
All of this military here are the ones tearing up the roads. They need a rail or something to the Naval base to deter the high trafffic.
Clueless
What has RA Alexander offered in terms of ideas to alleviate the impact of 81K servicemembers using the roadways? All he suggests is expanding current transportation networks. He sits at a desk 0700-1530 every day and a vast majority of personnel work the waterfront/airfields at this time too. That's when the Admiral expects people to work. It does no good trying to fit 10# of potatoes in a 5# sack. Would seem prudent there be a push from the top to stagger work schedules on the waterfront depending upon where that ship/command is in terms of the annual training/deployment cycle. You simply cannot expect everyone to rush the gates during traditional work hours and then cry wolf when there are delays. Think outside the box Admiral...
Clueless
I find it disturbing that one of the Navy's finest offers a solution to the area's road problems as such. And for this he will get a medal?