77°
forecast

'Tebow Law' for homeschool sports finds support in Va.

Posted to: News Politics Sports State Government Virginia

By Bob Lewis

RICHMOND

All Will Brockman wants is to play soccer for a few more years.

"I don't have a David Beckham or a Tim Tebow on my hands, but he's not bad," Sharon Brockman boasts of the 13-year-old son she homeschools in Montgomery County near Christiansburg.

Will plays on a private club team now, but that will end once his contemporaries matriculate into high schools and compete on their varsity teams over the next year or two. And under current Virginia law, Will will watch from the bleachers unless he enrolls in the public schools — something Sharon Brockman says won't happen.

"If push comes to shove, he won't play high school soccer either. It's more important to us that his education be what it is than he gets to play public high school sports," Sharon Brockman said in a telephone interview.

For years, a bill that would open public school sports teams to home-schooled athletes living in their attendance districts has come before the General Assembly and just as often, it floundered, usually before the Senate Education and Health Committee.

But with the Senate under new conservative management with this month's disputed Republican takeover, three bills by Republican House members revive the issue. Sponsors call it the "Tebow Law," named for Tim Tebow, an evangelical former homeschooler who won a Heisman Trophy and led the Gators to a 2008 national title at the University of Florida, then quarterbacked the Denver Broncos into this season's NFL playoffs.

"These people pay taxes that support their public schools. You can't just shut them out from the facilities and activities they're paying for just like everybody else," said Del. Rob Bell, a 44-year-old Albemarle Republican who sponsors one of the bills and is burnishing his conservative credentials for a 2013 race for attorney general.

Florida is among at least 15 states across the country that put no restrictions on home-schooled students who want to play interscholastic sports at public schools in their communities, according a state-by-state summary from the Home School Legal Defense Association. At least 13 states allow home-schooled children conditional or partial opportunities for extracurricular involvement at public schools.

The National Conference of State Legislators says it does not track the issue.

Opponents of the bill say that allowing kids who want no part of campus academic and social life to crash high school varsity teams would be unfair to full-time students, create enormous competitive inequities and gut eligibility and participation requirements of the Virginia High School League, the statewide sanctioning body for public interscholastic athletics and other activities.

"There are 13 individual eligibility requirements for participation for our programs, and under Delegate Bell's bill, the homeschoolers would meet only six and part of a seventh," said Ken Tilley, the VHSL's executive director.

Paying state and local taxes that underwrite public education doesn't, by itself, create an entitlement to a spot on a public high school varsity team, Tilley said.

"There are thousands of public school students whose parents pay taxes and who don't meet all of the 13 eligibility requirements and they can't participate," Tilley said. "Why should homeschoolers get that advantage? It completely destroys all fairness."

He's not alone in opposing the Tebow bill. The politically potent Virginia Association of School Superintendents and Virginia Education Association, which represents more than 60,000 public school teachers, have joined the fight.

They contend there is little or no periodic monitoring of academic progress for children taught by parents at kitchen tables, unlike in public classrooms. Nor, they say, is there any way to verify that a student is doing classroom work through the day, instead of working out with a personal trainer.

It would foment resentment among students and athletes, their parents and particularly school faculty, said Keith Rowland, the superintendent of Shenandoah County's public schools.

"The teachers are going to have that message ringing in their ears: 'I'm not good enough to provide you an education during the day, but I'm good enough to provide you come and play.' That's not a real good message," Rowland said.

Perhaps the bill's most formidable adversary is Del. Robert Tata, R-Virginia Beach. The chairman of the House Education Committee is nicknamed "Coach" for the football teams he led to championships in his days as a high school educator. He also was a University of Virginia football and baseball star in the early 1950s who played briefly for the NFL's Detroit Lions.

Tata fears that opening high school sports to homeschoolers would weaken the system's accountability and allow aggressive coaches at powerhouse sports schools to "recruit" home-schooled blue-chip players.

"I guess what you'd have is sort of like a bunch of adolescent free agents," Tata said with a laugh. "But how would you control it? I mean, you could have some 6 (foot) 4 (inch) gorilla at home who can't read or write but can run a 4.4-second 40-yard dash."

"It'll start all these schools recruiting, and don't think it won't happen," he said.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Tebow Bill

Oh, no! I'm shocked! :-) A founding member of the elite unionized government education monopoly opposing the Tebow bill? Government bureaucrats opposing choice, variety, flexibility, and options? Shocking! :-) Wake up people. If it doesn't involve more money, more teachers, or less work, the mental midgets of the VEA are going to oppose it. The rest of you opposers are just jealous that your little Timmy will get his butt kicked by a homeschooler. We're kicking his butt in academics, why not football?

Why Doesn't He Just Continue With His Club Team?

"Will plays on a private club team now, but that will end once his contemporaries matriculate into high schools and compete on their varsity teams over the next year or two."

The family cited at the beginning of the article may need some remedial classes in computers. A quick Google search show that the local soccer association offers teams all the way through age 18. The idea that this, or any student, has to have a school to participate in any sport is ridiculous.

NOT good enough

"I'm not good enough to provide you an education during the day, but I'm good enough to provide you come and play.' That's not a real good message," says a superintendent of public schools, basically proving that they are NOT good enough. "Provide you come and play?" That's not "real good" grammar!

"These people pay taxes that

"These people pay taxes that support their public schools. You can't just shut them out from the facilities and activities they're paying for just like everybody else,"

That mostly sums up the issue for me. Most doctors agree that sports are an important part of a child's development so if a parent agrees to have the child met the academic benchmarks somebody else pointed out below and not try and get an exemption, then I see no reason why a child should be left out of some thing that is as much a part of a child's development as the academic side.

Not the way to go!

So, homeschool kids on sports teams, debate team, drama and language clubs? Logical next step is if I don't like my son's public school math teacher, I demand that he be accommodated so that I can remove him from that class, homeschool him (I am qualified), and then send him back for all of the other subjects that meet my approval? Sorry, you can't pick and choose like that! I respect the decision to homeschool, but this is a good opportunity to teach that most important decisions in life require careful thought/evaluation of consequences. Life isn't perfect! Play City Rec league (very cheap), travel (more expensive), form your own team-there are options besides the sports team for the public school in which your child is not enrolled.

and there is the problem!

"The teachers are going to have that message ringing in their ears:'I'm not good enough to provide you an education during the day, but I'm good enough to provide you come and play.' That's not a real good message,"

That is EXACTLY it! The schools are NOT good enough to provide a quality education. That is why people are leaving the public schools. This is where we need vouchers. Schools might start working on competing with each other academically instead of just sports. In this case the school is saying: "sure, we'll take your tax money and in exchange you can get a bad education and play good sports...no?, well go get a good education on your dime (private or public) but you can't have access to anything you paid for."

Sports and education are different

What gives anyone the right to stop homeschoolers from participating in public school sports, educationally most homeschoolers surpass public school children on standardize testing. They do not have to deal with disruptive students and inadequate teachers. Our children started in public school but they were pulled out because of lazy teachers and students who felt that they had the right to disrupt class. I want my children to be educated, they can get their socialization by participating in sports or other activities. A poor teacher does not make them a bad coach, so do not compare the two. If you are worried about out of district students guess what it is happening now. Stop making excuses let them participate.

If they're not gonna let

If they're not gonna let home-schooled kids play on teams in schools that the parents support with taxes, then give the parents a tax exemption so they pay nothing to a public school system.

Tebow Law for Homeschool Sports

I have no problem with those who oppose this BUT at least educate yourself on the topic before passing judement. Homeschooled students must pass benchmark tests and submit them to the superintendent of schools every year. And I think it's safe to say NONE of them are gorillas- 6'4" or otherwise. I find it unsettling that Del. Robert Tata, R-Virginia Beach, whose credentials would imply he is an educated man & who represents the House Education Committee would make such an offensive & ignorant comment.

You should at least point

You should at least point out that no benchmark testing at all is required for those who obtain religious exemptions. E.g., in Chesapeake, 922 students were approved to be educated in homeschools; another 157 had religious exemptions not requiring any testing. In counties throughout the state, the number of students with religious exemptions from testing requirements is much higher than in cities.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    Politics rss feed    Sports rss feed    State Government rss feed   



Toolbox


Partners