79°
forecast

Tweak of bill expected to benefit shipyard

Posted to: Defense - Shipyards Military Newport News

A provision passed in haste with the fiscal 2012 defense authorization bill that could have spelled big losses for Newport News Shipbuilding instead will almost certainly be rescinded, officials said.

As written, the provision could force public shipyards to take over the job of nuclear refueling aboard aircraft carriers - work that is now done by Huntington Ingalls Industries, parent company of Newport News Shipbuilding. Less than a month after the law was enacted, though, the House Armed Services Committee is working to undo it, said Claude Chafin, a committee spokesman.

The provision probably will be reversed in the coming months by language in the next defense authorization bill, Chafin said. In the meantime, officials said, no work is expected to shift hands.

The language apparently is the result of the rushed effort late last year to get the bill to the president's desk. In an article published Tuesday, Congressional Quarterly quoted House aides who said the provision was written to codify current practices and clear up confusion, but it instead did the opposite. The aides acknowledged it was a mistake and "should not have happened."

"We're confident that this will be addressed and resolved in the next bill," Chafin said. He said the committee has heard from numerous stakeholders and has assured them that fixes are in the works.

A spokeswoman for Huntington Ingalls declined to say whether company officials are taking those assurances to heart, or whether they remain concerned. In a written statement, the company said, "We are working with our Navy customer and interested members of Congress and their staffs on a balanced, reasonable path forward."

Craig Quigley, executive director of the Hampton Roads Military and Federal Facilities Alliance, said that while he's not concerned now - he has verified with members of both Armed Services committees that the refueling provision won't be acted upon - he'll be paying careful attention to the next defense authorization bill.

"It's an issue for another day," he said.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Nuclear refueling

The public yards are incapable of refueling Carriers. Work package is too big.

Earmarking and special interest legislation

Isn't this amendment simply a reaction to keep Ingalls the only company doing this work? Isn't that earmarking? I thought there was a serious effort to abandon that practice. I would hope that the amendment would say "public or private" so that others, who might equally be capable, would be able to bid on the work, too. If Ingalls wins the contract, great for this region; if not, and at lower cost, great for the nation.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Defense - Shipyards rss feed    Military rss feed   



Toolbox