The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
Mayor Will Sessoms and Vice Mayor Louis Jones said Wednesday they oppose the plan to build a $109 million four-star Hyatt hotel next to the Virginia Beach Convention Center, dealing the controversial project a severe and likely fatal hit.
Sessoms and Jones joined five council members who have already opposed the hotel deal, meaning a majority of the body now opposes the public-private partnership with developer Armada Hoffler.
Since late November, the City Council has been grappling with the proposal, which would include a $67 million initial city investment for a 361-room Hyatt Regency, city-owned meeting space, and a pedestrian bridge to the convention center.
The $207 million convention center opened in 2007 with the promise of drawing big-spending conventioneers and trade-show attendees. But much of its business has been from local events, and city officials said the center has been losing business to East Coast rivals. A city consultant concluded that the hotel would help them compete for bigger conventions.
Opponents have questioned the rosy financial projections for the Hyatt hotel and said the industry practice of giving away convention space to attract events is evidence the market is saturated.
In a letter on Wednesday to the City Council, Sessoms recommended canceling next week's public hearing on the hotel, and the City Council vote scheduled for Jan. 24.
"The deal that is in front of us now just does not have the support of the council," he said in an interview. "This letter is certainly saying the deal that is on the table is not acceptable."
Vice Mayor Louis Jones, who helped negotiate the deal but, until Wednesday, hadn't taken a stance on the project, said he believes the Armada Hoffler proposal is dead.
"Too much risk on the part of the city," he said. "As the negotiations continued, the developer continued to make requests for changes and it got to the point where I couldn't accept the changes."
Sessoms, who has been publicly quiet on the project but in recent letters to constituents said the hotel's potential benefits deserved close scrutiny, said he still supports the city's helping build a convention center hotel, but that this plan would require the city to put in too much money. It's up to Armada Hoffler to come back with a better deal, he said.
In a statement, Armada Hoffer said it was "disappointed" by the mayor's letter. "Armada Hoffler and the city invested substantial time, effort and hundreds of thousands of dollars in crafting what Armada Hoffler believes is a mutually beneficial deal in an unprecedented and challenging financing environment," the statement said.
It did not say whether Armada Hoffler would keep negotiating with the city, and a company official and attorney declined to say. The statement thanked the city for allowing the company to participate in the process and said it looked forward to working with the city on future projects.
Hotel opponents on the City Council cheered the moves.
"It's a great thing," Councilman Bill DeSteph said. "Financially, it didn't make sense."
Councilman Glenn Davis said the City Council should formally vote to terminate negotiations with Armada Hoffler so the city can consider alternatives.
Davis is a proponent of a plan to renovate the DoubleTree hotel near the convention center.
Harmony Hospitality Inc., which owns the DoubleTree, has proposed upgrading the 292-room hotel and building a 134-room tower if the city will spend $5 million to $10 million on a walkway connecting it to the convention center.
Harmony will unveil a more detailed plan next week, a company spokesman said.
Aaron Applegate, (757) 222-5122, aaron.applegate@pilotonline.com
____
DOCUMENT | MAYOR'S LETTER TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Vote him out!Vote him out!Vote him out!
Vote him out!Vote him out!Vote him out!Vote him out!Vote him out!Vote him out!Vote him out!Vote him out!Vote him out!Vote him out!
The Mayor's letter is
The Mayor's letter is disingenuous at best.
In his letter he states " Over the past month, it was essential that the City Council establish this open-door process to properly educate the public regarding this large public investment, while also receiving our fellow citizens' thoughts and concerns." REALLY? Is this his idea of an open door process with tax payer money?
Didn't he and the deal supporters of the "deal" express their disappointment with the fact that news of the project was "leaked " to the press? This letter is a slick "time out /do over" request.
Today's VP has a great
Today's VP has a great article about the failures of Convention Centers/Hotels all over the country. Why ANY city would be trying to build one now, especially with taxpayer money is simply mind-boggling.
The change in the minds of the beach Mayor and other Council members is directly related to their chances of getting re-elected. Anyone that can't see this now simply has their head in the sand.
people
of vb, surely now you clearly see, mayor does not give a hoot about vb taxpayers $ or what the citizens want, only backed down when the almost done backdoor deal became exposed, let's not get into a repeat mayor, remember meyera, yikes, one term and out!! is the only way to beat corruption, by the way does vbcitizen00 sound like mb, friend, relative, coworker maybe?
and if you hate vb
So much, in a few short years, light rail will be here, and you can ride to another "less corupt" city....of course, taxes will be higher as you know we have one of the lowest tax burdens around
None of the above
I find it interesting, and disingenous, that you criticize our mayor for being anti taxpayer when he just decided the deal would be too risky for the taxpayers...he does what you want, yet you still b__ch! Relax a bit and get your panties out of a bunch! This coming from some one who voted for and loved mayor meyera..she certainly didn't have will's business acumen, but I can't imagine a better rep for our great city. I really feel bad for the boo birds.....i can't imagine anything would make you happy
I
am certainly glad that he shelved the project, but it would be good to know that he actually had a change of heart, rather then feeling in my gut that he just had a public relations nightmare and that was the real reason for the project being delayed.
If I recall correctly,
when the 1st article came out about this deal, Mr. Sessoms stated that he was surprised & extremely disappointed that the proposed contract had been made public. Thus, I seriously doubt that his decision to pull the contract from further discussion was due to his being worried about its riskiness to the taxpayers. (Vast numbers of studies detail those risks, so leadership probably knew of them prior to requesting bids from developers.) More realistically, he was concerned about the negative impact it would have on his reelection campaign this November. If the citizens are so unlucky as to have him win again, I have little doubt that a similar contract proposal will be presented again, probably by AH, for Council's consideration & approval.
I disagree
He was upbeat about the deal from the get-go. I believe he fully intended to push the deal through council after only one week and regardless of the overwhelming opposition to it at the public hearing, which His Moribundship touts as the place to make your voices heard vice this blog. I don't think the main objection was to building the hotel itself, but the $67MIL taxpayer subsidy. If Hyatt/AH were to fully fund it, and run it themselves without any subsidy, then I don't think there would be much opposition. VB will still collect taxes regardless of who pays for it. If VB is going to subsidize this hotel, then they need to do it for all private business. We can't afford that. Why should a private business pay to support his competition?
Spinning away ... ha, ha, ha
Here is the next business lobby Talking Point:
"I find it interesting, and disingenous, that you criticize our mayor for being anti taxpayer when he just decided the deal would be too risky for the taxpayers.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ... the truth isn't that the Mayor Townebank didn't suddenly decide this boondoggle was a bad deal for taxpayers. The truth is this scam was unexpectly exposed when it was supposed to be fast tracked over the Christmas season but now that the public found out sooner than the Mayor planned, he no longer has the votes on Council to ramrod this pig of a deal through.
Too funny. Like anyone believes Will gives a hoot about taxpayers!