79°
forecast

Lawmakers skip first-day jitters, go right to the jabs

Posted to: News Politics State Government Virginia

RICHMOND

Democrats' lively but ultimately futile effort to block Republicans from taking power in the Virginia Senate dominated the opening of this year's General Assembly session, marking an earlier-than-normal start to partisan squabbling.

Absent from much of Wednesday's proceedings was the back-to-school vibe often seen among lawmakers returning to the capital.

In its place were parliamentary disagreements over Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling's powers.

He's been in the spotlight since the November elections changed the balance of power in the Senate, from being controlled by Democrats to having a 20-20 split with Republicans announcing their intention to rule with Bolling's tie-breaking assistance.

Democrats have been fighting that.

They acknowledge that the state constitution allows the lieutenant governor to cast a tie-breaking vote on certain issues, but they insist that doesn't extend to how the Senate is organized.

Bolling and his fellow Republicans reject those interpretations, reasoning that the lieutenant governor is only barred from resolving a deadlock when the constitution explicitly requires approval from a majority of legislators.

Democratic Sen. Donald McEachin of Henrico County took the dispute to court last month, but a judge declined to restrict the lieutenant governor from weighing in on the Senate's organization.

Democrats had no more success Wednesday.

For more than two hours, they argued that the constitution doesn't permit Bolling to vote on how the chamber is organized. That's the domain of senators, they said.

Sen. John Edwards, D-Roanoke, said the GOP plan is "grossly unfair to citizens of Virginia who voted for a 20-20 Senate."

Democrats urged Republicans to share power, as the parties did beginning in 1996, the last time there was Senate parity.

But Senate Majority Leader Tommy Norment, R-James City County, reminded colleagues that accord was reached because of the political dynamics at the time, not good will on the part of Democrats.

And he defended his party's organizational plan, saying "it is not a power grab," but rather "a rearticulation of the Senate rules that we, on this side, think are appropriate."

Bolling broke several ties Wednesday - first to reject Democrats' power-sharing plan, then to approve a Republican rewriting of the chamber's rules, and finally on GOP committee assignments.

Particularly troubling to Democrats was removal of language that called for proportional representation on the Senate's committees that function as gatekeepers in the lawmaking process.

Many of the Senate's 11 committees are split 8-7 in favor of Republicans.

However, GOP legislators more heavily outnumber Democrats on the powerful Finance Committee, through which the state budget passes, and on the Commerce and Labor Committee, which weighs bills dealing with industry.

Democrats stacked committees in their favor when they were in the majority.

Wednesday's defeat may not be the end of this fight - McEachin said his lawsuit is still pending and that his attorneys are on standby.

Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Totally new concept

"Senate Majority Leader Tommy Norment, R-James City County, reminded colleagues that accord was reached because of the political dynamics at the time, not good will on the part of Democrats.

And he defended his party's organizational plan, saying "it is not a power grab," (Thus making the first totally untrue statement of the legislative session) but rather "a rearticulation of the Senate rules that we, on this side, think are appropriate."

Translation: Good will is not a viable concept to us when it comes to representing the people. What Is a viable concept is "what we sez, goes, SO THERE!

Two words.

Tom Moss.

Suck it up, Democrats. You break it, you bought it.

Keep on whining Liberals!!!

If you don;t like make up of the State Senate, win more seats next time... until then be ready to deal with it. Remember, in the words of your messiah Obama: "Elections have consequences."

"Elections have consequences"

The consequence of the last General Assembly election was a tie in the Senate between Republicans and Democrats. A tie. A 20-20 split. Fifty-fifty. Even-steven.

messiah?

I'll pardon your snarkiness, but George Bush said that.

"I won the election, John,

Elections have consequences."

President Obama to John McCain during one of the faux joint summits. He really is a petulant, little boy.

And another:

1. Alberta Darling, one of the Republican State Senators targeted for recall is getting antsy, and rightfully so. Darling states that “elections have consequences.” Wisconsinites realize that already though.
2. Barbara Boxer Chairman Barbara Boxer stops a committee member from bashing Al Gore on his environmental facts because she is in charge of the committee. "---That you're not making the rules. You used to when you did this. You don't do this anymore. Elections have consequences."
Guess no one has sole rights to that deathless quote.

First Things First

First Bill for the GOP...Reinstate "Carry Me Back to Ole Virginny" as the State Song! Happy days are here again!

will they ever get over the partisan bull and represent

ALL the people? I can understand a limited amount of partisan bickering but it's out of control now. They need to realize that we didn't elect them to create more entitlements and find more ways to spend our money so they can tax us more. Wouldn't it be nice if they actually started eliminating the spending and entitlement programs that are NOT a charter or function of government?

Giving up the power is hard to do

I can't believe that the GOP didn't realize that the Lt. Governor's tie breaking vote only applies to the Democrats. The GOP should be sensitive to the democrats when they lose power,for they give free money and programs to those who refuse to work and free assistant and education (thanks to tax payers)

The democrats here, darn well know that they would use the Lt. Governor for the tie breaker and would do the same thing the Republicans are doing, so why the fake tears?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    Politics rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners