The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
Legislation to permit private, faith-based child placement services to reject prospective parents, including homosexuals, whose lifestyle conflicts with their beliefs cleared a House of Delegates committee Tuesday.
The measure, HB 189, from Del. Todd Gilbert would enshrine in state law a “conscience clause” for private agencies freeing them to decline an adoption or foster care arrangement without fear or losing their state license. It also would shield such agencies from legal action by people denied a parenting opportunity.
That legislation that cleared the House Health, Welfare and Institutions Committee Tuesday is an outgrowth of last year’s debate over licensing standards for private placement agencies.
It culminated last month when the state Board of Social Services approved licensing standards lacking expanded discrimination protections to the delight of social conservatives and the dismay of gay rights advocates.
Gilbert, R-Shenandoah County, said his legislation would protect the updated regulations – they take effect May 1 – against future efforts to alter them.
Virginia Beach Republican Sen. Jeff McWaters has offered similar legislation in the Senate. Both legislators say their bills are drawn to preserve religious freedom.
Supporters say their measures would give assurances to private, faith-based agencies that they can continue to place children according to their beliefs.
Without it, said the Virginia Catholic Conference’s Jeff Caruso, church agencies wouldn’t be protected from being forced “to provide adoption, foster care placements with same sex couples,” something that’s at odds with church doctrine.
Current state law allows married couples and individuals, regardless of sexual orientation, to adopt children.
Critics say the legislation amounts to a discrimination license for private agencies which receive public funds for placing children on behalf of the state.
According to the Virginia Department of Social Services, pass-through public funding from various sources is used to facilitate child placements across the state, where local social services divisions function as adoption and foster care conduits, often through contracts with private agencies.
“You can abide by your religious tenets all you want in a private context where you’re not taking taxpayer dollars,” Del. David Englin, D-Alexandria, said during the committee hearing.
Del. Joe Morrissey, D-Henrico County, blasted the proposal as mean-spiritied and un-Christian.
Others said the bill is written so broadly it could protect private agencies that condone corporal punishment of foster children, something Virginia prohibits.
At present, about 4,400 Virginia children are in the foster care system, with roughly 1,300 available for adoptions.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

this is going to be a long few years
In our Republican run state, this is going to be a long few years.
Oh look, another useless
Oh look, another useless salvo in the culture wars from the supposedly jobs minded GOP. Who would have thunk it? Welcome to the Christian Theocracy of Virginia.
You guys having fun yet?
Pull another trick the country like you did in 2008 and you may find yourselves out of power for the rest of your lives.
It had to be a trick didn't it.
The FACT that a very strong majority of people voted for President Obama has no place in your fantasy world where "real Americans" such as your self would be in charge EXCEPT that somehow there were "tricks" and "fraud." I guess he "tricked" us again with his SOTU speech which garnered a 91% approval rating. Here is a suggestion - tune into something besides Fox News and Rush Limbaugh. The world they create for you is very simply NOT REAL.
What trick is that? As a 65
What trick is that? As a 65 year old man, surely you can remember far back enough to tell us what tricks were pulled. Other than people voting whom you hate to see vote.
What trick was that? Going to the poles, voting and electing
a person for president, who, although I don't always agree with his decisions, is calm, sane, and rational, as opposed to a candidate of the party of the right's lunatic fringe of religious zealots, gun nuts, financial hucksters and the wealthy 1% who have nothing in common and not an iota of concern for the working class?
That trick?
Show me a candidate worth voting for
Not so sure about that comment with the slate of candidates the Repubs have put forward. Neither of the media anointed front runners show me anything. Do I vote for a relic of the 80's who was run out of the House in disgrace or a Mass moderate who, for all the world looks more liberal than Bill Clinton?
not tax dollars
Being monitored by the state and receiving state funds are two different things. As long as its not my tax dollars these adoption agencies have the right to filter applicants to their standards be it morals, ethics or finances. If you gave a child up for adoption would you want anything less?
Yes Sir
You can pray with Mr. Bachman and pray away the gay, cause remember the earth is only 6000 years old and there were dinasours on Noahs boat. lol
That being said....
These agencies should be able to grant adoptions to whomever they wish. It's quite simple really. If you don't like what they believe, go somewhere else to adopt a baby. Then go off and raise it however you like, preferably in California.