79°
forecast

Afghan soldier who killed four forged papers - twice

Posted to: Military

By Jon Stephensonand Ali Safi

McClatchy Newspapers

MAHMUD RAQI, Afghanistan

The Afghan soldier who killed four French troops last month had bribed an Afghan army recruiter to forge his enlistment papers, deserted to Pakistan and then bribed his way back into the army the month before the shootings.

The apparent ease with which a rogue soldier twice circumvented the Afghan National Army's vetting process - with the aid of a corrupt recruiter whose job it is to stop such applicants - suggests that the U.S.-led coalition still cannot be certain of the integrity of the Afghan security forces.

The United States is entrusting the country to them as American troops end their combat mission, perhaps as soon as next year.

The Jan. 20 shooting spree in Kapisa province, northeast of Kabul, caused outrage in France and prompted President Nicolas Sarkozy to announce that French combat forces would withdraw from Afghanistan by the end of 2013, a year earlier than scheduled.

Cmdr. Abdul Musahiwal, police chief of Musahi district of southern Kabul province, said the shooter was a 21-year-old second lieutenant named Abdul Saboor. Daulat Waziri, deputy spokesman for the Afghan Defense Ministry, confirmed Saboor's identity but declined to discuss details because the investigation was ongoing.

In a copy of an Afghan Defense Ministry interrogation report, Saboor described how, in April, he approached an Afghan army recruiter, who offered to prepare enlistment papers and a fake national ID card for a bribe of 500 afghanis, about $10.

Saboor was sent to a training center and then deployed with the 6th Battalion, 4th Brigade of the 203rd Tandar Corps, according to the interrogation report. He deserted eight months later and went to Peshawar. What he did in Pakistan was unclear.

When he returned to Afghanistan, he found his way back into the army in December with the aid of the same recruiter in Kabul, he told interrogators. The recruiter knew he was a deserter, but after Saboor paid him 800 afghanis, about $16, he was again furnished with fake papers and found himself back in the army.

McClatchy was unable to independently verify the contents of the document, but it appeared to be authentic. Waziri, the defense spokesman, would not comment on McClatchy's findings but defended the government's screening process for army recruits.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

ahh, the pilot at it again. trying to bring discredit to the war

by showing how inept the afghans are. When the pilot does garbage like this, it lessen the work our guys are doing. Yes, this needs to stop on their end, but the way the pilot looks for ways to make this war seem futile is down right sickening. Yes, the pilot is a left leaning rag, but you do your reporting in a military community.Do you really think we like to see you trying to defame the work our men and women, husbands and wifes, brothers and sisters are doing? Its like the pilot goes out of there way to paint the work we are doing as pointless and we might as well just quit.

Whats next for the pilot, to start spiting on those returning like what happened during Nam? I bet you would want that to be happening, wouldn't you?

Oh, come on.

Should't your anger be directed toward the lying, murdering scum who did this, and the one who helped him? What made the US think we'd do any better in Afghanistan than the others who tried and were defeated?

The Pilot reported an occurrence. Sorry if telling the truth is too "left-leaning".

m anger is spot on. did the pilot inform us of how rampent this

is? Is this a cultural occurance in that area? How many folk (scum) are doing this? How much impact do we have to stop this practice? Is it within our charter to address this happening? Yes, it is a problem in the afgan army that they must deal with. But the pilot is not helping anyone with these kinds of stories. The should know it as well.

Regarding doing better then the others who have tried, that is the pilot talking, and rags like that. They appear to want us to fail for some reason like reed wanted us to fail in Iraq for political gain. I know our guys can make a difference, but when they have to fight our own Congress and media for the hearts of the region, its tougher to impossible to make a difference.

how is this news for HR? It is news in afganastan, sure, but

we are not of afganastan, right? I know I am not. With that, what else is this depicting? Positively or negatively for the war effort? Will people think "hey, our guys should be over there because some good is happening" or "why are our guys over there when scum are allowed to cheat and lie to get into the military. Where is any integrity for us being over there?" More people see it as the latter. Which is what the Pilot is after. Persuade the MOB to a course of action. In this case, question the value of being in afganastan. How many are thinking why are we there? Did this story help people to think that way? Did this story hurt the resolve or help the cause in our fight against terrorism? It hurt it, which the pilot appears to desires.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Military rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features