79°
forecast

Are we just posturing to be the greatest griever of all?

Posted to: Entertainment Mike Gruss Spotlight

The inevitable first step in coping with a musician's death is to evaluate what the artist's music has meant in your own small, meaningless life.

Of course, last Saturday, Whitney Houston died and so:

Memory 1: In third grade, our choir sang "The Greatest Love of All." This was noteworthy because it had not been included in the canon of lousy songs elementary school choirs often sing.

Memory 2: By middle school, if you hadn't asked a girl to dance by the time the first notes of "I Will Always Love You" played, well, tough luck, buddy. Go stand in the corner with the other dudes and stuff those sweaty hands in your pocket, because "I Will Always Love You" was always the last song. Dance over.

Memory 3: What kind of weirdo would I be if I walked around the house singing made-up lyrics to the dog to the tune of "I'm Every Woman." So glad I've never done that.

But beyond a little navel gazing, then what?

Jennifer Hudson sings a Whitney song at the Grammys. Appropriate.

Fans make Facebook posts, upload YouTube videos. Tributes come a la Twitter. A career in 140 characters.

Monday night, a local news anchor talked about a Whitney Houston memorial the next day in Newport News.

I turned, again, to my own memories of Whitney Houston, and I hesitated. I felt sympathy for her family and closest friends, but that was it.

Should I feel more grief? Who, I wondered, was sad enough to attend the kind of service planned on the Peninsula?

The first words Bishop Kendrick Turner said to me when I asked about the memorial: "Standing room only."

Turner, who coordinated the service in Newport News, said 200 people showed up at the Hiram Grand Lodge. They listened to Houston's songs, including, of course, the one from "The Bodyguard" soundtrack, "I Will Always Love You."

When we spoke Tuesday after the service, Turner said he would have booked a bigger place if he had known so many people would come.

Then, he offered quickly, "I wish she had never met Bobby," referring to singer Bobby Brown, Houston's ex-husband and an easy one to blame this week for all her troubles.

Granted, Turner didn't know Bobby. Or Whitney. Nor, most likely, did anyone else who was there Tuesday.

I asked him why people felt like they needed to attend.

Houston's death - and her reported drug use - is a reminder that we all need a community to support us, he said.

And so we grieve.

In the 2009 book "Adolescent encounters with death, bereavement, and coping," David Balk and Charles Corr sum it up this way: "Expressing this sense of loss on the Internet and with peers provides a sense of connection and community."

A few weeks ago, in the wake of the Joe Paterno scandal, the sportswriter Joe Posnanski blogged about the idea of competitive outrage, particularly when it came to Paterno and the sexual abuse case involving Penn State.

Posnanski's idea was that many of us, and our online personas, engage in a contest to see who can be the most vehement in our denials, the most pure of heart in our anger, the most absolute in our convictions, when a scandal breaks.

That idea also has carried over to grieving: who can feel the deepest sorrow?

This is not to discount the tangible influence celebrities hold over us. But I wonder if we have become so disconnected from each other that when someone, even a person on the furthest orbits of our lives, dies, we react passionately. Maybe too passionately. We post our favorite songs. OMG. RIP.

We act how we think we should act.

Every couple of days comes an outpouring of grief for the most famous of the newly dead. It starts appreciatively but quickly moves to hyperbole, to who is grieving the most, crying the hardest. An ABC News special this week started with the commentary "The world has lost its voice."

Some express genuine sadness. Others, like me, privately puzzle over why we don't consistently feel the loss more deeply, as if there is a missing gene in our circuit boards.

Megan Garber wrote on The Atlantic magazine website how technology had sped up the grieving process. "It was a little bit awkward still to be talking about Whitney. Today, even more so. It's just so... Saturday night."

That was Monday.

By talking about it, by posting YouTube videos of the national anthem, by playing greatest hits collections on repeat, a patchwork community of grief forms.

But then someone else dies, in a car crash, in a fire.

We do it all again.

And still, none of it makes any sense.

 

Mike Gruss, 757-446-2277, mike.gruss@pilotonline.com, pilotonline.com/gruss

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Some "Grievers" say, "Look at Me!"

Think there's also an element w/some people where they try to be the "greatest griever" to get attention for themselves. These same people will often make up or exaggerate connections to the people. You see this when high school students die, where people will pretend to have known them or been their best buddy, when the opposite is true. Even at funerals of adults, some people w/minimal contact to the victim are loudly "mourning" as though they're a grieving spouse. How many of these celebrities who are mourning Houston actually had any contact w/her at all in the last few YEARS, THAT would be interesting to find out. I don't blame her family for keeping the service private. W/these people it's not "poor Whitney," it's "poor sad me."

It is a national competition

This is one of your best recent columns.

I suggest that future mourners video tape their grief and post to Youtube. After an apprpriate mourning period, the tapes woud be judged by the deceased's next of kin and America's Top Mourner proclaimed.

Blame it on the Irish?

Very interesting, very insightful article. No answers, of course, but a great discussion of a few of society's foibles. Short attention span, instant gratification, need to celebrate somebody's death --- I don't know, and I gather you don't either.

Blame it on the Irish --- weren't they the first to want to party when someone died? If you drink enough, it all begins to make sense --- or so I'm told.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Entertainment rss feed    Mike Gruss rss feed   



Toolbox


Partners