79°
forecast

Letters to Editor - bLetters

We welcome your opinion on public issues, in either of two ways. You can submit a letter to the editor for possible publication in the printed edition. The Virginian-Pilot welcomes letters to the editor on all topics, although concise letters (150 words or less) on public issues will receive priority. Letters may be edited for length, style and clarity and writers are limited to one published letter every month. Please add your name, city, street address and daytime telephone number for confirmation.

The other way is to comment on the published letters in this blog. In this online forum, you can comment as much as you want by using the comment box at the end of each entry.

By e-mail: letters@pilotonline.com

By mail: Letters to the editor - P.O. Box 449 - Norfolk, VA 23501-0449

By fax: (757) 446-2051

'Big government' GOP

Columnist Kerry Dougherty ('Those who hate nanny-state should loathe abortion bill,' Feb. 3) carpet-bombed the legislative initiative to require ultrasounds prior to abortions. As she said, no true conservative could support such a governmental invasion of the doctor-patient relationship.

It amuses me greatly that self-professed 'conservatives' argue with equal fervor that no restrictions can be placed on gun ownership, but that any manner of ill-concealed 'safety' impediments to a woman's constitutional right to choose abortion are perfectly OK.

It is intellectual dishonesty and a sad commentary on how far the state GOP has deviated from true conservatism. It no longer has a philosophy, only a doctrine.

Perry Miles
Norfolk

Where?

Please state the part of the constitution that specifically says women have a "constitutional right" to abortion. If you can't find it, then each state may regulate abortion. However, you seem so certain that in a matter of mere moments you will probably have it up for us.

"Please state the part of

"Please state the part of the constitution that specifically says ..."

This is the opening clause of the naive literalists playing what they consider their best albeit illusionary trump card. The literalists deny that any change, with which they disagree, has occurred by legislation or adjudication.

that's too many big words

that's too many big words for a literalist to digest at one time.

I think a literalist may understand this:

THE CONSTITUTION WAS NOT WRITTEN IN STONE.

you're welcome. :)

That part of the constitution is Article 3

The judiciary examines federal legislation, state laws and executive branch regulations to determine their constitutionality.

They found that bans on abortion were unconstitutional in 1973.

Moderates, then, would

Moderates, then, would support very limited and reasonable limitations on both gun ownership and abortion, under the assumption that most citizens are personally responsible enough not to need someone else to tell them what to do with their bodies (in the case of abortion) or why they can't protect themselves and their families from bodily harm (in the case of gun ownership).

In this polarized political environment, we moderates are becoming rarer and rarer in politics; but in the end, we understand the threat posed by both extremists from both the right and the left who want to use government to violate people's fundamental liberties.

Mr. Bowman

Middle-of-the-roaders stand for nothing. Those who are conservative or liberal are labeled as extremists. Had Jefferson, Washington, Madison, etc., etc., been middle folk, we would still live, or exist, in colonies.

You appear

You appear confused.

Obviously, I stand for something.

I did post something, didn't I?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

Toolbox