The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
In a letter to members of the Virginia Senate, a national child welfare organization has urged lawmakers to reject legislation that would allow private child placement agencies to deny adoption or foster care to prospective parents for religious or moral reasons.
"Under this law, agencies -- whether religiously affiliated or not -- could turn away qualified families for countless reasons that have no relevance to the needs of children or the family's ability to provide a safe, loving, and permanent placement," Christine James-Brown, president of the Child Welfare League of America, wrote in a Feb. 7 missive to lawmakers.
Those comments are directed at so-called conscience clause legislation, which would free private agencies, including faith-based groups, to deny a child placement if doing so is at odds with their beliefs. It also would prohibit the state from rejecting or revoking an agency's license on those grounds.
Bills to codify those protections are moving through the legislature this winter after the state Board of Social Services last December adopted licensing regulations for such agencies without expanded discrimination prohibitions.
Much of the debate over those regulations centered on whether prospective gay parents could be turned away by private placement agencies.
Critics, including Democrats and gay-rights advocates, say the legislation sanctions discrimination by groups that get public money to place children on behalf of the state.
But its supporters say the measures are necessary to protect religious freedoms and keep faith-based agencies operating.
Virginia has about 4,400 Virginia children in foster care. About 1,300 of them have a goal of adoption.
"These children have been through so much already," James-Brown wrote in the letter. "It is cruel to deny them a secure home with a qualified family that happens to differ from the religious or moral beliefs held by a particular agency. Virginia's children deserve better."
Her letter came as the Republican-controlled Senate rejected several amendments proposed by Democrats to soften pending conscience clause legislation offered by Sen. Jeff McWaters, R-Virginia Beach.
A copy of the letter was released Wednesday by the American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Spending tax money to support bigotry
Spending tax money to support bigotry. Now that's an idea every Republican should get behind! Bigotry is the core value of the Republican Party. From blacks to Mexicans to Muslims to the poor to Chinese to gays to whomever, the Republicans always try to find someone that is different than they are to demonize.
Thye should not disciminate if they take tax money
If they want to pick and choose who to work with, then they should not ask for everyone to subsidize them. I am not allowed to refuse to subsidize groups who violate my principles.
DON'T PASS A LAW TO FURTHER PREJUDICE
People who are in the business of finding loving, supportive parents and homes for children who need them should be REQUIRED TO SET ASIDE PERSONAL PREDJUDICE(singling out a particular group of people for special treatment is discrimination born out of prejudice).It seems to me that many people do not understand the protection of religious freedom in this country. Your religious beliefs should govern how you as an individual conduct your life and make personal decisions. Religious liberty does NOT mean that you are entittled to dictate how other people conduct their lives and make their decisions.No law should be passed that facilitates discrimination.
Don't take tax dollars
So, republicans don't want "their tax dollars" being used to fund entitlement programs but it is OK to use taxes that gay people pay to support state-funded, faith-based agencies that provide services they are not able to used simply because of their sexual orientation. Surely everybody would agree, if the agencies want to follow this policy of discrimination then stop taking tax dollars.
Long before the gov't got involved
it was the Christian churches who were responsible for adoption services. Why should they have to change? This is another example of the government's war on Christianity.
They don't have to change
They shouldn't have to change. just stop taking government funds. Why should the gay community "spread the their wealth" to organizations that are prejudice against them. I am just using "conservative logic."
They don't have to change
They don't have to change
Submitted by telleroftruth
The government is taking the children from the family so why shouldn't they have to pay the cost of placing the child?
I strongly believe it is wrong to place an innocent child into a home with immoral values as witnessed with gay couples. Which person is mommy and which daddy? If that child obtains the age of 18 and they decide they are gay more power to them. But an innocent minor child should not have to deal with this kind of situation.
It is not a dem or repub issue. It is a moral issue. Young children are easily impressed and should be given a fair chance at a normal upbringing.