The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
When police stopped a 33-year-old man's car and found 300 grams of cocaine in a hidden back-seat compartment nearly two years ago, it was no coincidence.
Investigators had secretly tracked Angel Alfonso Chirinos-Escala's movements using a GPS device, according to a stipulation of facts from the commonwealth's attorney's office.
With the help of the device, investigators confirmed he had been running cocaine from New York to Virginia.
Late last month, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that police cannot plant GPS devices on suspects to track them without first getting search warrants.
In Virginia, the biggest burden from the ruling doesn't appear to be that a warrant must be obtained. Rather, it's that the search must be conducted within 15 days of when a warrant is issued. That may not be enough time to do a thorough investigation, according to Brent Johnson, chief deputy commonwealth's attorney in Norfolk.
"The problem with the search warrant is it's such a limited amount of time," he said.
While the ruling means an extra set of eyes must review their requests to use GPS technology for tracking, police departments in Hampton Roads said it would have minimal impact.
For law enforcement, GPS has become a popular tool to track suspected drug dealers, burglars and car thieves. But local officers say it's used only in a handful of cases.
"The volume of cases where they're used is few and far between," said Phil Ferguson, commonwealth's attorney for Suffolk. "The bottom line is now, (police) would have to get a search warrant."
Suffolk police Capt. Dean Smith, commanding officer of criminal investigations for the department, said GPS evidence hasn't been the linchpin of any cases there and isn't commonly used.
"The Supreme Court decision doesn't hurt us at all," Smith said. "It just puts another step in our investigation. When we use GPS, we've already got probable cause developing or developed on an individual."
About 18 months ago, Suffolk police used a GPS device to investigate scrap-metal thefts. A device on a suspect's vehicle helped police discover he was also committing burglaries in the Outer Banks.
"We would have never known he was going to the Outer Banks without it," Smith said.
In Chesapeake, police said GPS devices have been used as investigative tools, but they don't expect the extra step of obtaining a search warrant to greatly affect them.
"It would just take a little bit more time for us to secure the search warrant needed," police spokeswoman Kelly O'Sullivan said.
In the Virginia Beach case, Chirinos-Escala pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute a schedule I/II drug, as well as transporting cocaine, Macie Pridgen, a spokeswoman for the commonwealth's attorney's office, wrote in an email. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison, with four of those years suspended.
Investigators had followed Chirinos-Escala's movements from New York to Virginia Beach because he had been the target of an investigation into drugs flowing in from the north, according to the stipulation of facts in his case. On June 8, 2010, a detective stopped him for failing to signal correctly.
A K-9 pointed to the back of Chirinos-Escala's car. When police searched his blue Acura TSX, they found a hidden hydraulic compartment under the back seat, according to the stipulation of facts. Stashed inside was the cocaine.
In the future, the General Assembly likely will provide more guidance on using GPS in investigations, said Johnson, the chief deputy commonwealth's attorney in Norfolk. The current law may not give police enough time to use the devices effectively
"A search warrant is wholly inadequate," he said. "When these code provisions were written, none of us could have imagined this technology."
Veronica Gonzalez, 757-222-5208, veronica.gonzalez@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Well....
Well, I find modern surveillance camera technology somewhat intrusive, but I really think is a fair trade-off for the police being able to observe and round up the bad guys. Would you rather have your car's picture taken in a public place or have it stolen from a public place? Would you rather have your mug photographed in a public place or be mugged in a public place? This type of technology is not going to go away and will become only more and more widespread in the future. Just keep in mind that while in public places- malls, gas stations, grocery stores, banks, city streets, etc.- a camera somewhere may indeed be recording you, so just don’t break any laws and you will have nothing to worry about.
Well.......
This isn't about being under surveillance in public, this is about over reach of law enforcement. This is about making sure there is probable cause for certain types of surveillance.
The government better have a darned good reason to place a tracking device on my vehicle and they better prove it to a judge before they do so.
I know there are cameras practically everywhere, I may not be thrilled with it, but it is what it is when I am out in public. Tracking my movements is an entirely different can of worms. That is what this is about.
This goeas down the same slippery slope as gun controll
All those who lite up the comment boards about the slippery slope on the 2nd amendment to chime in on the slippery slope on the 4th amendment.
Indeed, since 2001
we have let the Constitution founder, what with the vile rights defying Patriot Act and the incompetent and intrusive TSA, The attempted grab of more power by the last two presidents, laws violating gun rights, the right to assemble, even attacks on religious freedom from both sides, especially the fundamentalist right trying to declare us a christian nation, and the 9th Amendment is all but forgotten, replaced by an dangerous and insipid worship of the 10th. And every elected official has ignored that their jobs are answerable to the people, that they are essentially vassals of the people. It's time for the people to put them back in their places.
Long before
The trampling of the Constitution began before 2001, it has just seemed to have occurred since then because it has been happening faster. Prior it was more the frog in the kettle. Now it is more out of the pan and into the fire.
slippery slopes
The slippery slopes you bring up are just 2 sides of the same coin. The problem is there are far too many who are unable to connect the dots to realize how closely connected all of these things are.
so it looks like the current ruling is really good
For catching someone with a really big stash of drugs or illegal weapons. For keeping tabs on garden variety crooks, not so much. Of course all they need to do to keep track of the garden variety crooks is just track their cell phones which are almost universally equipped with GPS now.
You still need a search
You still need a search warrant for their phones.
If they can do that to the crooks without a search warrant, they can do it to you, remember that.
Quiturcryin
must be another officer (probably Ches) defending the Gov'ts right to violate the Constitution whenever they choose. The tired old arguement that "only the guilty" care about the freakin Constitution is BS. American citizens are starting to wake up. While your lecturing the citizenry to stop crying, how about reading our U.S. Constitution!!!!
Thank you
Rights aren't subject to the whims of any police officer. They are ours to hold on to, not theirs to take.