The Virginian-Pilot
©
Twenty-four years ago Timothy Dorsey, a novice Navy jet pilot, was flying an F-14 Tomcat during a training exercise when he shot down an Air Force jet over the Mediterranean Sea, injuring the two aviators aboard.
A military investigation faulted him for a "basic error in judgment" and "an illogical act." Dorsey, who was based at Oceana Naval Air Station at the time, never flew again.
But his military career didn't end.
Earlier this month, Dorsey, now a Norfolk-based captain in the Navy Reserve, was nominated by the Obama administration to be a rear admiral. His appointment is awaiting Senate consideration.
Dorsey's supporters say he has redeemed himself since the incident, building a strong career as an intelligence officer.
His critics, including the pilot he shot down, say he should have been forced out of the service more than two decades ago. Some said they are contacting their senators to ask that his appointment be stopped.
"It was an unfortunate incident that occurred when I was a rookie naval aviator," Dorsey said Tuesday. "I regret that it occurred, but I have worked very hard over the years since that time."
The mishap was never covered up, he said, and has remained a part of his personnel record.
"Those involved in the promotion and selection board process in the Navy have complete access to my record, including those things that resulted from the accident in 1987," he said.
The pilot Dorsey shot down, Air Force Lt. Col. Michael Ross, said his own military career was hampered due to the debilitating back injury he suffered in the crash and eventually cut short by a medical discharge just months before he qualified for a regular pension.
"It cost me a lot," said Ross, who estimated he has undergone more than two dozen back surgeries in the years since the crash.
"I don't go a day without thinking about the guy who did this."
The incident occurred Sept. 22, 1987, during a war games exercise when Ross' RF-4C Phantom, flying from a base in Italy, was acting as an intruder trying to locate the aircraft carrier Saratoga.
A year later, Knight-Ridder News Service produced a detailed account of the incident - based on the Air Force investigation report - that described how Ross' plane was undergoing a midair refueling by a KC-135 tanker when the two aircraft were spotted by the Saratoga's radar operators.
Two F-14s, including Dorsey's jet, had taken off from the ship minutes earlier carrying live Sidewinder missiles - in violation of an agreement with the Air Force that the weapons would not be used, according to the news service.
Dorsey, then 25 with 245 hours of flying time in the F-14, was chasing Ross' twin-engine jet when he called the Saratoga for advice.
The carrier told him, "Red and free on your contact." He later told investigators that shocked him because the phrase meant to him it was "clearance to fire" on the Phantom.
"The combination of factors that I was seeing outside the airplane and hearing made me shoot," Dorsey said at the time. "It was very fast - I did not have time for a big three-party discussion."
"Seeing the Phantom close in on the carrier, I armed up and squeezed the trigger."
After his first missile malfunctioned, Dorsey fired a second Sidewinder, striking the Phantom.
Ross said Tuesday that he and his backseat man, 1st Lt. Randy Sprouse, didn't know what had happened and thought they may have collided with another plane. Both ejected, parachuted to the sea, and were picked up by a helicopter that took them to the Saratoga.
Sprouse ejected from the aircraft in the correct position, Ross said. But the missile spun the jet in such a way that Ross was pressed against the canopy rather than the seat as he ejected.
He broke a wrist, dislocated both shoulders and suffered a compression fracture of his spine.
Ross continued in the Air Force, but the injuries hampered his career, he said, forcing him to leave for medical reasons in 1997, less than six months before completing 20 years of service. As a result, he said, he receives a medical pension that is much less than regular military retirement pay.
Ross and others who oppose Dorsey's nomination contend that his career was saved in part because his father is Vice Adm. James Dorsey Jr., who was assistant deputy chief of naval operations at the time of the missile attack.
Timothy Dorsey said the allegation is not true, adding that his father, who retired in 1991, was long absent from the Navy for most of his career.
After Dorsey was grounded, he changed focus.
In September 1991, he left active duty for the Navy Reserve, where he became an intelligence officer. Working primarily in Norfolk, he went on to serve as commanding officer of three units.
He was mobilized to active duty in the Middle East during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as a counterintelligence and intelligence officer. In 2003 he led the Navy's Mobile Interrogation Team that questioned Iraqi prisoners of war.
He also earned a law degree in 1995 at the University of Richmond and currently is vice president and general counsel for USA Discounters in Virginia Beach.
Rear Adm. Dennis Moynihan, the Navy's top spokesman, said military promotion boards are required to take a close look at a candidate's entire record.
When considering promotions, he said, board members "should not automatically discount any officer who, with the exception of a single incident, would otherwise be considered to be the best qualified."
The instructions for the promotion board considering rear admiral candidates order members to review any "adverse information," with a caveat.
"While the Navy is, and will remain, a service of higher standards and strictest accountability, we do not embrace blind adherence to a zero-defect mentality," the instructions state. "All of us have made mistakes in the past; the test is of the character and resilience of the individual and his or her ability to learn and grow from that experience."
Eugene Fidell, a military justice instructor at Yale University, said a meaningful Senate review of Dorsey's nomination is a healthy practice to ensure civilian control of the military. But added that the military "has a long history of permitting the advancement of people who, through good deeds and good work, overcome past disasters."
Retired Air Force Maj. Gen. Timothy Peppe, who was Ross' commanding officer in 1987, said he does not take the mishap lightly. But he added, "There's a lot that has transpired in almost 25 years. You inherently have to trust the system. Dorsey is like a lot of other aviators over the years. He's made a pretty significant mistake, but he's not the only guy that made a mistake."
Bill Bartel, 757-446-2398, bill.bartel@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


ground crew
I was one of the crew chiefs that launched Mike and Randy out that day. One of the things that saved them, other than there training was that they had just come of the tanker and the aircraft fuel tanks were full of fuel. If it had been half an hour earlier, the aircraft would have exploded. We were TDY to Aviono AB and were asked by the navy to stay to help with their training. I may have been AF, but I still knew what all the navy jets looked like. So when a navy pilot fly's his jet up alongside an air force jet and make eye contact, and then dropping back behind them, arm's a live missile and pulling the trigger,That’s way worse than a rooky mistake.I’m just glade Mike and Randy both made it out. And the worst part is, now they want to make th
ADM Dorsey's (Father) Blue on Blue?
I was in VF-14 back in 1987, and we heard that SMOKE's father had also splashed a friendly when he as a young fighter pilot during the Vietnam era. Was wondering if this could be verified!
Full Story of the Incident as Reported at Time
The author did not do the most basic of research. See below if folks wish to compare stories as reported at the time of the incident.
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1988-04-18/news/8803090693_1_uss-saratoga-rf-4c-phantom-pilot
I was there
I was an officer in LTJG Dorsey's squadron when this occured. Almost all negative comments were based on the minimal information provided in this biased, bot well researched article. The author of the article would be justifiably outraged if an article with the same lack of research was written about HIS past actions. Most comments overlooked the fact that USS Saratoga was deployed in the Mediterranean Sea, and it was 3 months after the USS Stark was severely damaged by an Iraqi Exocet missle. Many facts were not included in this article, and you had to be there to understand. It was the cold war, and fighter sorties from the ship were ALWAYS armed. Sara was NOT on a training mission. It WAS participating in a training exercise while deployed.
I was there too.
But in the cockpit of the RF-4. Cold War, Sure, Exercise, Sure. Following me for 15 minutes off a USAF Tanker & firing 2 missiles attemptng to kill me, unacceptable!! Did you read the ATO or the SPINS for DD-87? No sorties for DD-87 were armed. They were required NOT to be armed. Trust me, I've read both accident reports, and seen the HUD video. Anyone who after being asked during the investigation & stated if he knew at the time he took the 2 shots what he knew at that time, he'd do it again, doesn't represent the best of the Navy I have known. I still know many superb Naval officers including several who have reached Flag rank. This one just isn't of that caliber. Those who know the whole story agree, those who don't, just surmise.
1987 F-14 Pilot
I worked on F-15s in the Air Force in 1987. The electronics and weapons systems were similar to the F-14. These pilots are trained very well with the operation of their weapons systems. With an Aim-9 Sidewinder missile, you have to flick a switch to arm the weapons control panel. Then you have to lock the Aim-9 on to a heat source. And it is usually used at short range. So he probably had a visual on the F4. The enemy flew Migs at that time, not F4s. Plus, each fighter craft had an IFF system. It's identify friend or foe. Which would have told him he was chasing a friendly F4. Something does not sound right here. If you were to point a loaded gun at a fellow US officer and fire, would you not receive court martial for attempted murder?
I wasn't there but . . .
I was in a command center elsewhere in Europe where we monitored the incident. I later worked for Admiral Dorsey, CAPT Dorsey's father. I later went in the reserves and met Tim Dorsey. We were LCDR's and CDR's together, then he made CAPT and I did not. So I have known him about a decade professionally, both as a colleague, then as a subordinate. In all that time, I never told anyone about the incident, knowing it was in his records and the boards could figure it out. Tim Dorsey is one of the finest officers I have known and I always knew he would get his shot at admiral someday. He has more than atoned for the incident 24 years ago.
I was there too
There is more to the story than what is listed here. I was a Flight Deck Coordinator and thought I might have lost my tanker that day. By leting him stay in, suggests that the Navy did not blame him for the incident. (Aircrew only got one strike back then.)
I think he deserves the chance especially if his record has been clean since then.
It's the peter principle...
...that rewards incompetence in our officer ranks.
With Leaders Like This
Four more and Dorsey's an ace! I'm really glad to see the good 'ol boy club is still alive and well in the navy. Had Capt. Dorsey been a minority or a woman, they would have been forced to walk the plank years ago.