Julian Walker
The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
In the face of widespread public criticism, some General Assembly members say they are working behind the scenes to "soften" a controversial bill that would require women to undergo an ultrasound examination before having an abortion.
Republicans on Tuesday delayed a vote for the second day in a row on SB484, sponsored by Sen. Jill Holtzman Vogel, R-Fauquier County, which would require an ultrasound procedure. Two legislators - one a conservative Republican - speaking on the condition of anonymity, said officials have discussed making the ultrasound legislation optional rather than mandatory.
Abortion-rights advocates have criticized the bill because it would require most women seeking abortions to have a probe inserted into their vaginas.
Del. Lionel Spruill, D-Chesapeake, told the House on Tuesday that Vogel's bill would "force what I consider a legal rape with an ultrasound probe."
But Lynchburg Republican Del. Kathy J. Byron, who sponsored a House ultrasound bill, said in an interview after the House adjourned that abortion-rights groups and some in the media are distorting the proposed legislation.
Byron said most women in Virginia who have abortions already have ultrasounds. Most abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, require an ultrasound, she said.
Without an ultrasound, the procedure for a first-trimester abortion might be performed on a woman who is more than 12 weeks pregnant, she said. That could put the mother's life at risk, she said, because the procedures for abortions after 12 weeks' gestation are medically different.
"This bill requires that the gestational age is verified and confirmed through an ultrasound," she said. "Without an ultrasound, you're just guessing."
Jessica Honke, a spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood, confirmed an ultrasound is part of the group's "standard of care," but added if a woman insists on not having one, a decision as to whether she can have an abortion "is between her and her doctor."
Vogel's bill and another measure that defines life as beginning at conception - called the "personhood" bill - drew scorn at two protest rallies on the State Capital grounds Monday. "Saturday Night Live" and other media shows have poked fun at the success of Republicans in advancing anti-abortion bills.
"The national conversation about Virginia is about whether a vaginal probe is a mandatory requirement before a woman exercises her constitutional right," said Del. Charniele Herring, D-Alexandria.
Asked about the national media attention, Byron said it was to be expected in a presidential election year.
"This is an issue that garners attention, especially when the information is distorted," she said. "When your opponents start spreading misinformation, you just keep firm and generally the truth will prevail."
Del. Todd Gilbert, R-Shenandoah County, the Republican House whip, said the GOP continues to strongly support the bill. A vote was delayed so several contentious bills, including one to relax the state's gun-purchasing laws and another that allows private adoption agencies to deny placements that conflict with their religious tenets, could be heard at the same time.
Gov. Bob McDonnell has expressed support for an ultrasound law, but because the bill is in flux, a spokesman for the governor wouldn't commit to a position.
Meanwhile, critics of bills to curb abortion rights continue their resistance. Today, opponents will present petitions with more than 30,000 signatures against ultrasound and "personhood" legislation to McDonnell's office.
Pilot writer Bill Sizemore contributed to this report.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Message from VA's GOP
Dear Virginia, vaginal probes are for vaginas. That's where they belong. If you didn't want your vagina probed, then you shouldn't have grown a vagina. And let's remember that you elected us because you wanted something other than "Hope." Sincerely, The GOP
Questions
Not taking into account the ultrasound, why does the woman have to sign a statement on whether she chose to view the ultrasound and hear the heartbeat? And why does this form with the ultrasound have to remain a part of the woman's medical record?
For the purpose of
For the purpose of intimidation
...which is what makes the
...which is what makes the bill an effort to impose the religious beliefs of certain individuals in Richmond on an entire segment of our population.
Choose your words wisely
I really wish they would stop calling this "rape". As a victim of rape this is down right insulting. Having an vaginal ultrasound done by a medical professional is no where near the magnitude of surviving a traumatic rape. Stop trying to overemphasise and exaggerate something that it is not. Have a little more respect for those that have acutally been raped, we should'nt be the basis for comparison or your careless remarks.
I would beg to differ. I
I would beg to differ. I was a victim of rape and this is exactly what it sounds like to me. Please speak for yourself.
If it against your will
then it is rape.
Forced. The key word is Forced.
Title 18.2-67.2 Code of Va.
INANIMATE OBJECT SEXUAL PENETRATION
Definition: Penetration of the vagina or rectum with any object by force and against the will of the victim.
These legislators are trying to pass a law that requires a medical professional to penetrate a woman's vagina with an object by force and against her will.
In no other circumstance would we allow citizens of our state to be subjected to an invasive medical procedure against his or her will. Not only is the woman in question not giving her consent to have her body penetrated, she also does not have the right to decline this procedure.
Therefore, this can indeed be characterized as rape.
Okay,
Inanimate object sexual penetration. Unless you can prove there is a bona fide medical reason it is a felony. Medical necessity can only be determined on an individual basis by a doctor, not the legislature. The coercive intention of this bill, under the guise of "information" may not constitute rape, but it is on the same page.
There is a medical necessity
There is a medical necessity for the ultrasound itself to date the fetus to determine what type of abortion to perform and whether or not the fetus is within the legal timeframe to even conduct the abortion.