©
![]() |
| Some lawmakers are trying to prevent any alterations to the Wisconsin that would render it unfit for military use. Norfolk wants to open the ship’s interior to visitors.
(the virginian-pilot file photo) |
By DEBBIE MESSINA
The Virginian-Pilot
NORFOLK - As city officials plan to take ownership of the Wisconsin, the battleship has become snarled in a debate in Congress.
Some lawmakers are trying to prevent any alterations to the ship that would render it unfit for military use. Norfolk wants to open the ship's interior to visitors.
The deck of the Wisconsin, berthed next to Nauticus, has been open to the public since April 2001. It draws 500,000 visitors per year. The Navy has not allowed local officials to open it for full tours in case the military ever needed to bring the ship back into active service.
In December, Congress voted to decommission the Wisconsin and donate it to Norfolk.
Now, the House version of the defense budget says the Wisconsin and another decommissioned ship, the Iowa, "must not be altered in any way that would impair their military utility" and "must be preserved in their present condition."
Lisa Wright, a spokeswoman for U.S. Rep. Roscoe Bartlett, R-Md., who supports the provisions, said the congressman wants to "retain the battleships on the naval registry" so that "if there was a national emergency, they would be maintained so they could be recalled."
Bartlett is chairman of the Armed Services Committee Projection Forces Subcommittee. Wright could not say whether Norfolk's plans would conform with the proposed restrictions.
The issue was aired by syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak earlier this week. Novak said that the Marines are behind the movement, advocating the maintenance of the warships as troop-support firing platforms, especially with the rise of Iran as a potential nuclear power.
City officials and the local Congressional delegation said they hope the legislation can be changed so it will not interfere with Norfolk's plans to operate the World War II-era battleship as a museum.
The House and Senate are meeting this week in conference to resolve differences within the defense authorization.
"Hopefully we'll get an agreement to allow Virginia to proceed forward as planned with its renovation of the ship," said John Ullyot, a spokesman for U.S. Sen. John Warner, R-Va.
Ronald H. Williams Jr., Norfolk's director of intergovernmental relations, said he's been told it's unlikely the restrictions will be in the final bill.
If the provisions remain, Williams said it's not clear what the effect would be on the city's plans. The city has until Sept. 30 to submit operating plans to the Navy. The Iowa will be donated to the state of California.
Richard Conti, executive director of Nauticus, said the city will have plans ready by the end of the month that address finances, maintenance, collections and other aspects of operating the Wisconsin.
The battleship would be run by the National Maritime Center board, which oversees Nauticus and the Wisconsin.
Estimates on how much private money is needed to prepare the ship to be a museum are as much as $10 million, city officials have said.


Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Clearly some don't get it
The Navy has been without any credible Naval Gun Fire Support for troops ashore since this ship was decommissioned. Congress in 1996 recognized this lack of capability and passed PL104-106 which required the Navy to maintain 2 Battleships until they could certify they had a NGF system equal to or greater than the BB's. In 2006 the Navy did not certify. So our troops lack any credible NGF support. Is this vital? Yes it is. This is why for several decades each Commandant has testified that the serious lack of NGF puts our soldiers at great risk. Congress in the 2007 Defense Bill recognized this. Keeping the BB's is a cheap Insurance Policy. It cost 1 Million a year for 2 BB's to be reserved and ready to fight. The Navy's future ship program is all Paper. There is nothing for the next 30 to 50 Years. The reason? The USMC has stated it will need 24 DDG-1000's to meet its requirements. At the earliest the First DDG-1000 will not be ready for combat until 2015.
Keep the BB
Say again? In case of what?
OK, let's get all we can from our military hardware, but let's draw the line somewhere. If this thing wasn't a museum, it would probably get sunk and become an artificial reef. Even if we needed it, and we don't, with the current manning level and operational tempo of the military, who would be your crew? Boy scouts? Get real, and make it a museum. It won't make a lot of money, but at least it would serve some purpose.