Hampton Roads, VA - 11/21/2009
Broken Clouds60°Broken Clouds
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Norfolk court clerk bytes off ambitious goal: Paperless files

Posted to: News

By MICHELLE WASHINGTON
The Virginian-Pilot

NORFOLK - In George Schaefer's courthouse, paper equals money.

By converting marriage license forms to a computerized document the happy couple fills out themselves, Schaefer, the circuit court clerk, estimates he saved about 60 work hours per month - which adds up to $12,000 a year.

His paper-free ambitions expand to a much grander scale. Schaefer estimates he could save $2 million on the cost of building a new courthouse if he gets rid of the volumes of paper warehoused in the circuit court.

He's on his way to doing it.

Clerks began scanning all new civil filings the first of the month. Marriage license forms went digital on the day before Valentine's Day.

Schaefer and his staff already have converted most of the land records stored at the courthouse to digital images. Marriage licenses and judg ments have been scanned into computers.

The effort included removing sensitive information such as S ocial S ecurity numbers and mothers' maiden names from documents to prevent identity theft.

Schaefer is part of the state's electronic filing study group, which aims to eliminate paper from all transactions at the courthouse. Lawyers would file lawsuits via e-mail, and j udges would sign orders using a digital pen on a laptop computer. "The driving force is we need to find a way to be more efficient with space," Schaefer said.

Court clerks save everything.

Land records back to the 1700s, records from criminal and civil cases, gun permits, and countless other pieces of paper sit in files that Schaefer has to keep track of. Throughout the building, shelves loaded with years' worth of documents tower over most of Schaefer's employees.

A computer server room " is the size of a closet as opposed to a huge room to save files," Schaefer said.

Computer storage is cheaper than conventional storage. Computer memory is measured in bytes. One of the largest measures, called a terabyte, costs less than $1,000 each and can hold more than a trillion bytes of information.

Schaefer said the 4 million images recorded for marriage licenses, judg ments, land records and other items took up a few billion bytes - just 2 percent of a terabyte.

A new courthouse is estimated to cost about $200 per square foot, Schaefer said. It would take between 5,000 and 7,000 square feet to hold those 4 million paper files, at a cost of $1 million to $1.4 million.

Schaefer pointed to other disadvantages of the paper he shuffles.

None of the files has a back up - one lit cigarette poses a hazard to the entire historical record of the city.

Only one person at a time can use them. Clerks spend work time tracking down case files or transferring them from one holding area to another. They often must transfer information from paper to the statewide court computer system anyway.

Norfolk's circuit courthouse handles more paper now than ever before; for the last two years, the volume of cases has increased more than 10 percent.

Not to mention the paper cuts.

Compare to the computer version: Off-site back up. No lost files. Multiple users can access the same file at the same time. And in the future, computerized records could make the courthouse a 24/7 operation.

"You can file up to 11:59:59" p.m., Schaefer said. "You no longer have the barrier of when the courthouse is open." The clerk's office now closes at 4:45 p.m.

Schaefer said no one would be turned away from the courthouse, even those who arrive with a handwritten complaint for a lawsuit.

"We'll scan it," he said. "Even the digital divide will never be an impediment to allowing people into the courthouse."

Those who need paper copies of documents will still get them. They also will have the option of receiving a copy via e-mail, Schaefer said.

The Norfolk federal court plans to move to an entirely electronic system by the end of this month. All new filings will be delivered and accessed electronically.

The entire federal court system is scheduled to become paperless, at least for new filings, this year. Information such as dates of birth and S ocial S ecurity numbers are to be edited out of the filings to prevent identity theft.

Schaefer hopes Norfolk will be a test state court for all-electronic filing.

At the moment, Schaefer said, online access to the court's files presents problems because of identity protection, but it may eventually be possible through a subscription service like that used for land records.

Circuit Judge Junius P. Fulton III also serves on the electronic filing study group. He pointed to the courts in Clark County, Nev., where even the computers in police cruisers are integrated with the system.

The goals are lofty, Fulton said, but that's how they should be.

"We'll move as quickly as we can, but as slow as we have to," Fulton said.

Staff writer Tim McGlone contributed to this story.

  • Reach Michelle Washington at(757) 446-2287 or michelle.washington@pilotonline.com.




  • ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

    Not a New Idea

    I think this is a wonderful idea and effort, but this is year 2007. This technology has been around for along time. The purpose for "Word Processing" and "database storage" was to create a paperless office back in 1990. Thats like saying "I have created this round thing called a wheel, so now the anti-lock brakes on the car will work properly." I do believe in work smarter not harder, but... There is a noticeable drawback that no one has discussed. That is digital "public" information can be searched 10,000 times faster, which means some info about ourselves is more readily available, guilty or not. Try to steal 50 filing cabinets with 30,000 names verses a server that has been hacked with 10,000,000 names. Which is heavier? I dont want to say its not a good thing, just pray that somebody gets it right for once (unlike the Veteran Affairs Office who lost a laptop filled with info). Good Luck!!

    Schaefer is a real professional

    George Schaefer is leading the way statewide in automating the Circuit Court Clerks offices. This article should cause citizens (and reporters!)in other Tidewater cities & counties to ask why their Clerks are not as progressive as Schaefer. Do not let them use the excuse of 'no money, too little staff'. Schaefer gets as much or even less in money & staff than the other offices in Tidewater, yet none of them are as advanced or as efficient as Norfolk. Why? A one word answer: management. In this case, because the Clerk is elected by voters, an inefficient Clerk, wasting taxpayers money & not performing, can be fired by the voters. The Norfolk Circuit Court is the standard to judge all the others. Norfolk voters elected the right guy as Clerk. Can other cities say the same?

    Paperless Office = Easy high tech solution

    I applaud this courthouse's efforts to convert wholly to a paperless office in the hopes that it leads other firms down the same path. As a paperless office expert, I have helped many companies over the last eight years convert not just archived files, but live files paperless in order for them to host the digital files on their servers. Many companies are not only pleased with the increased ease of access (the files are text searchable, so no more going through thousands of files to find the one paper you need), but they are also surprised at the total cost of converting to a paperless office, which isn't nearly as expensive as one would think. And it's not just limited to legal documents as well, as doctors and real estate agencies have also converted with ease. I hope that this sets off a new trend to show just how beneficial digitizing any office with an abundance of files can be. Congrats to you, Mr. Schaefer.

    A long road ahead

    Perhaps when they convert everything to digital images and turn the court into a 24/7 operation, they won't charge several hundred dollars for access to public land records that only date back to 1993. The current online land records system is ungodly expensive and practically worthless, and hasn't been improved in the least in the past year or so since it was introduced. Shaeffer's goals are good, but if he doesn't improve how he's reaching those goals, then things are going to be even more **** than they already are.

    Paperless Files

    We're trying this in Nassau County, New York as well. I hope the Norfolk clerk knows what he's doing because those up here don't. Our system is bass ackwards.

    Comment viewing options

    Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
    Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

    More News Stories

    More articles from: News rss feed