©
The Virginian-Pilot
Ah, Virginia. The realm of registries.
First there was the sex offender registry. (A good thing.)
A couple of weeks ago, we got the dangerous dog registry. (A feeble thing.)
Now, lo and behold, we have the "I had sex with a woman!" registry. (A bizarre thing.)
In the blizzard of bills that buries Richmond every winter, many of us missed this one. Seems the General Assembly passed a law in 2006 creating a "Putative Father Registry," which was activated on July 1, 2007.
It allows a man who's had sex with a woman who's not his wife to record that erotic encounter. In case he wants to block an adoption in the future.
Yes, sir. If you've had ah, relations, with your girlfriend, your girlfriend's sister or a drunken one-night stand, you can go online and file a formal report with the state. Lotharios who aren't tech-savvy can mail in a record.
The online instructions are cheery:
"You may register as many times as you like for each potential pregnancy or different child. If you have multiple relations with the same person or more than one female that you are involved with, you need to register for each."
One problem. Last time I checked the Code of Virginia, fornication - sex engaged in by unmarried people - was a Class 4 misdemeanor. Seems the state's inviting men to confess to a crime. Hmmmm.
In fact, billboards may soon remind guys to record their illicit romances, with messages such as these from the Department of Social Services' Web site:
Do You Think You Have Fathered A Child? Could You Be A Dad? Don't Be Left Out of the Picture of Your Child's Life.
"It's not Big Brother," protested Carla Harris, spokeswoman for the Department of Social Services. "This is not the sex police."
Maybe not. But it means Virginia just created one more governmental databank. One that will contain some of the most personal information imaginable. Not to worry. We all know that confidential computer records are completely secure. Besides, at least 35 other states have done the same thing.
"New York has had a putative father registry since 1977," Harris told me.
Well, then. It must be good.
Like most bills to come out of Richmond, this one was well-intentioned, meant to streamline the adoption process.
When a single mother places her child for adoption, the law demands that an attempt be made to notify the father.
Finding Daddy can be daunting.
"We were chasing them down dark alleys," said Barbara Jones, an adoption attorney from Fairfax who helped craft the law. The child was in limbo, and the adoption was delayed while officials looked for the father, she said.
Under the new law, if a potential father hasn't put himself on the Putative Papa list, and the birth mother doesn't name him as the biological dad, he's waived his parental rights.
Frankly, I think we're being too kind to these men. Guys who don't stick around long enough to find out whether they've caused a pregnancy have terminated their paternal rights.
If they know a baby's on the way and then disappear, they aren't fathers, they're what's known as sperm donors.
In the interest of trying to find loving homes for kids who need adoptive parents, the General Assembly ought to look for ways to strip these irresponsible Romeos of their rights, not invite them to record their random copulations.
Kerry Dougherty, (757) 446-2306, kerry.dougherty@cox.net

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Daddy
Virginia is a state of illusions. Politicians who run Virginia are astigmatic old people whose vision is blurred with the stigma of past bias and secrets hidden behind church going fervor.
Religious fervor undermines the imposition of creative forward looking ideas beneficial to Virginia's growth as a modern state.
The main growth product in Virginia appear to be churches and prisons. Faith based laws permeate the General Assembly while back room deals suck tax payer monies out of the treasury.
Religious people seek to force others to their thinking. Daddy law is one way to peek into the homelife of others ensuring they toe the line-so to speak.
Let me get this straight....
We now have a website where a man can claim he slept with a woman...doesn't have to prove it, mind...and it becomes a government record?
Wow, I'm glad I'm not dating anymore!
Did anyone ask if it violates womens' right to provide a government sponsored billboard where men can tell everyone the names of women who've slept with them? I wouldn't want my boyfriend to advertise and anyway, who's to say people who sign up are even telling the truth? Couldn't a group of teenage boys trying to slander a classmate simply all log on and say they've slept with her? What about a nut who wants his ex girlfriend back and finds out she's pregnant, so he signs up and says he recently slept with her? Is he then granted the right to keep her from giving up the child for adoption or having the baby's real father on the birth certificate? Could the freak get visitation for claiming to have slept with her?
default daddies
If they cannot find the fleet-footed father, then just make the sponsors of this bill the default daddies.
So the state wants a man to control what women can do?
This is closely akin to the muslim thing of making the women slaves of the man and making them walk around like third class citizens. Not allowed to even show their face in public. Welcome to the real world. I will not have a man dictate to me that I will have to spend nine months of agony and then be forced to be tied down with his baby while he skips out on paying child support or even visiting with the kid from time to time. Fact is Social Services doesn't have the ability to force an ex-husband and bio-dad to pay child support. Now you want to give them the authority to keep a list of who is having sex with who and then forcing a woman to have a child she doesn't want while they can't seem to force the man to pay support.
Unintended consequence
So, my girlfriend and I have been living together for three years. She just became pregnant. We planned the pregnancy. We also plan to get married, but she does not want a ceremony with a "belly." Does that mean I must register online with the possibility that we have some destructive break up and she does not list me as the father on the birth certificate? Does this new law automatically take away my rights just because I didn't go to some website that I may never have known existed?
"Fathers Rights"...
"Father's Rights" that is the biggest joke I have ever heard... The only "right" an unmarried father has is to pay child support. Fathers will have rights the same day white men have a television channel created "just for them". And that is not meant as a racial put down in anyway. That's just how this society works. The more "privileged" individuals loss certain rights and are expected to just deal with it... You all know what I'm talking about and I doubt few will admit it but I could care less what people think about me. We kid ourselves to think we are all treated as equals.
slightly off topic
Does anyone else thinks it's a little less than fair that women have all the rights, receiving child support, the right to choose whether or not to have a baby (abortion), adoption, etc, and men have none? I'm not saying I want men to be able to tell a woman she can't have her baby, but I can't help thinking if she can decide she isn't ready for whatever reason, maturity, money, or anything else, why does he have no choice in what his role will be? We all know it takes two to tango so she isn't some "innocent victim" of pregnancy. Often times though, the father becomes a victim. With condoms, birth control, and abortion rights for women, I think it's about time men get equal rights on this front.
We elected these people???
Why don't they put the money they are spending on this stupid idea towards our transportation fund? No wonder they can't find enough money for our roads.
Whacky Website
I'm with you Kerry; our General Assembly needs to develop ways to castigate the dawdling daddies - how ridiculous, or better yet, cockeyed !