Hampton Roads, VA - 11/08/2009
Clear52°Clear
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Political bias said to affect judicial choices

Posted to: News


Partisan politics is generating friction over judicial appointments as Democrats and Republicans push their own candidates for court vacancies in South Hampton Roads.

For example, what lawmakers initially characterized as a review of the fitness of Norfolk Circuit Judge Chuck Griffith for reappointment has developed political undertones.

At the same time, the process of selecting two people to fill judicial vacancies on Chesapeake's Circuit Court is sparking some behind-the-scenes horse trading, according to legislators.

Divisions over whether Griffith should be reappointed boiled over last week, when Senate Courts of Justice chairman Sen. Henry Marsh III,

D-Richmond, and Sen. Kenneth Stolle, R-Virginia Beach, a committee member, exchanged heated words about setting a hearing date for the judge.

Griffith was named to the bench in 2000 and ran as a Republican for commonwealth's attorney in 1992.

Last month, a state senator removed Griffith's name from the list of judges to be considered for an additional term. In a December letter to Del. Johnny Joannou, D-Portsmouth, Norfolk lawyer Allan Zaleski questioned Griffith's suitability for the post, saying Griffith has shown bias in his decisions and has a poor courtroom demeanor. Since then, legislators have received dozens of calls and letters supporting or opposing Griffith's reappointment.

The House Courts of Justice Committee, controlled by Republicans, has set a Friday hearing date for Griffith.

Marsh, who was initially noncommittal, has since agreed to give Griffith a Senate committee hearing. Marsh said he would ask the House to change its hearing to conform with the yet-to-be-scheduled Senate hearing.

Del. W.R. "Bill" Janis, R-Henrico, said Monday that the House courts committee intends to stick with the Friday hearing.

"It doesn't look good if the Senate Democrat leadership is basically perceived as refusing categorically to participate in a process whereby Judge Griffith has an opportunity to tell his side of the story, and where we have the opportunity to hear from folks both against him and for him," said Janis, who leads the panel's judicial systems subcommittee.

Stolle, who lobbied for a Senate hearing for Griffith, said some Democrats' reluctance makes him believe that partisan politics are a factor.

"If they're making up their mind without hearing the facts, it has become political, and I think that's unfortunate," he said. "In the eight years that I chaired the Courts of Justice Committee, there were a number of judges who weren't re-elected, but every judge was afforded an opportunity to give their side of the story."

Sen. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth, said Democrats aren't playing party politics.

"We make our decisions based on the interview and qualifications of the candidate, not politics," said Lucas, a member of the Senate courts committee. "Scheduling has been an absolute nightmare."

In addition to deciding whether incumbent judges retain their seats, legislators must name jurists to vacant posts. There are six judicial vacancies on circuit courts in Hampton Roads including the two in Chesapeake: Virginia Beach and Hampton each have one, Norfolk has two.

The two open seats in Chesapeake Circuit Court have prompted the most maneuvering, according to several legislators.

Republican legislators favor prominent Chesapeake defense lawyer John Brown and city Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Judge Rufus A. Banks Jr., according to legislators close to the negotiations.

Several Democratic lawmakers have said they can support Brown, but not Banks, according to sources.

Initially they preferred Chesapeake Juvenile and Domestic Relations Judge Eileen Olds, but more recently substituted Norfolk Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney Marjorie A. Arrington. Arrington confirmed her interest in the post last week.

Democrats have more influence in judicial appointments this year after the party won the Senate majority last November. The GOP still controls the House.

Stolle said that political dynamic has created "a new day in the General Assembly."

"If you have more than one judgeship and you have a split delegation," he said, "I think you have to start to think in terms of compromise."

Norfolk's openings came from the retirement of Judge Jerome James, who had been the court's longest-serving judge, and from the resignation of Judge Alfred M. Tripp, who surrendered his post after a mysterious three-month absence during which, a source said, he was banned from the courthouse.

Courthouse observers speculate that Commonwealth's Attorney Jack Doyle and Jerrauld Jones, a Norfolk juvenile court judge and former delegate, are under consideration for the openings. Both said they are interested in the posts.

Several people are vying for the open seat on Virginia Beach's Circuit Court. City Attorney Les Lilley said Monday that he had a "good interview" on Saturday with members of the local delegation and hopes for an invitation to be interviewed by the House and Senate courts committees in Richmond.

The Virginia Beach Bar Association "highly recommended" Lilley and four other candidates for the post: Glen Huff, president and founder of a local law firm; Ken Geroe, former head of the city's Democratic organization and former vice chairman of the state party; General District Judge Gene Woolard; and Juvenile and Domestic Relations Judge Winship Tower.

Stolle said Monday night that he is hopeful Lilley will get the post. Stolle said Lilley will be invited to Richmond. When asked if other candidates would be brought to the capital, Stolle said, "probably not."

Suffolk and Hampton each have one General District Court vacancy apiece, and Hampton also has one open seat on its Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court.

 

Staff writer Richard Quinn contributed to this report.

Michelle Washington, (757) 446-2287, michelle.washington@pilotonline.com

Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

Suggestion for stories like this

I think the Pilot needs to create a subsection of the news called Stuff You Already Knew. This article would make a good first addition to that section.

Every Judge

is politically bias. There is no news in this and it doesn't matter what level of government the appointment comes from. Some things just don't make any sense!

Though it is agreed that political bias is in the works

Griffith is not politically aligned; we are speaking of a judge who will not allow the exploitation of defendants by their representation in criminal cases. Griffith can plainly see that these criminal attorneys are stalling the inevitable by attempting to continue cases to log more billable hours for these clients who are in desperate straights. Check the respected officials, attorneys, and public on the whole that supports him and then check out those who oppose him. Ask yourself why a senator from Roanoke has interest in Norfolk City courts. If the pilot really cares to dig they will find out the reasons go even deeper then suspected. Griffith should be re-appointed and the citizens of Norfolk should appreciate his dedication and fairness. Separate your political bias and check his overall record. You will see that Griffith is one that we need to secure and realize that politics are at work and say enough is enough..... I'm a lifelong democrat

Bias!

Political bias in selecting judges, --- gee I'm shocked. I wonder how many people out there know that for every year a judge sits on the bench he is credited with serving four years for retirement purposes. Prove me wrong! If a judge serves 5 years he is credited with 20 years for retirement purposes. Talk about wasting our taxes.

Forked Tongue

I believe Senator Stolle is talking out of both sides of his mouth. When Judge Katherine Howe Jones came up for reappointment, he refused to grant her a hearing. Now that it is a Republican, he suddenly feels it's only fair for a judge to have a hearing. Check out the VP for Feb 16, 2001:

February 16, 2001
JUDGE WON'T GET HEARING, SAY TWO KEY LAWMAKERS; STOLLE JOINS CRITICS,

"General District Judge Katherine Howe Jones will not get a hearing before a General Assembly panel to respond to complaints about her courtroom conduct, two key legislators said Thursday.
The chairmen of the General Assembly's Courts of Justice Committees, which oversee judicial interviews, said they have decided to decline the request for a public hearing.
Sen. Kenneth W. Stolle, R-Virginia Beach, said he was so angry over a courtroom press conference Jones held this week to defend herself that he would block her election even if Norfolk Republican legislators dropped their opposition to her."

Now THAT is how a legislator returns his own serve!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More News Stories

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox