Regulators reject Va. pleas to delay drilling plans

Posted to: Environment News Politics Virginia

Federal regulators have rejected pleas from state and congressional leaders to delay plans for oil and gas drilling off the Virginia coast until President-elect Barack Obama can take up the contentious matter.

In a letter before Christmas, Gov. Timothy M. Kaine asked the federal Minerals Management Service to put off its offshore planning process until Feb. 28 "to allow time for the new administration that will take office in January to consider its options to the proposed actions."

Before then, a group of East Coast senators and congressmen, including U.S. Rep. James P. Moran, a Democrat from Northern Virginia, urged the federal MMS to drop the idea altogether, citing environmental and national security concerns.

"We do not believe that MMS should begin a process that it cannot finish," wrote the 10 lawmakers from New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts and Virginia.

They noted in a separate letter that "we recognize that the Bush administration has long supported energy exploration in this area" but said studying the possible exploration and drilling off Virginia could take years to complete.

While rejecting calls for such extensive delays, the MMS has said it will extend a public comment period by two weeks, to Jan. 13, on the first stage of an environmental analysis of an offshore project.

The service cited recent holidays, not politics, as its rationale.

In an interview Wednesday, the director of the Minerals Management Service, Randall B. Luthi, a Wyoming lawyer and rancher, said the political push about timing and Obama is "not necessarily unexpected."

Luthi, appointed to the post by President Bush in July 2007, said the flap misses a larger point: Any exploration or drilling off Virginia is years away and will come only after significant study and public input.

"The reality is, the next administration can delay the process, speed up the process or imprint the process as they see fit," he said.

Congress had banned oil and gas drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf of the Atlantic Ocean for nearly 30 years. With energy prices fluctuating and the desire to veer from foreign sources high, the government has pushed to allow some drilling for offshore fossil fuels.

The MMS has recommended a sale of exploration and drilling rights in a wedge-shaped swath of the Atlantic at least 50 miles from the Virginia shore.

Obama initially opposed the idea. He changed course during the campaign and now says he favors offshore drilling as part of a broader, greener energy policy and if environmental studies and neighboring states approve.

Luthi said that if Virginia leads the way, "the potential is somewhat phenomenal." It could trigger a "process to increase domestic production dramatically, which is something I personally support."

Environmental groups see Virginia as "the crack in the door" through which oil and gas companies hope to walk in their drive to exploit larger reserves elsewhere.

"MMS, still obviously in bed with Big Oil, wants nothing more than to limit the scope" of environmental studies in Virginia, said Eileen Levandoski, conservation coordinator in Hampton Roads for the Sierra Club, an environmental group.

In his letter to the MMS, Kaine said his administration still is considering whether "to become a cooperating agency" with offshore activity.

His biggest concerns, he wrote, are that the federal government is not following state energy policy, which calls for exploration of natural gas only off the Virginia coast, and does not support any oil exploration or any gas drilling until studies are completed.

Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

So leasing means free in your world?

Lease- a contract renting land, buildings, etc., to another; a contract or instrument conveying property to another for a specified period or for a period determinable at the will of either lessor or lessee in consideration of rent or other compensation. (Virginia receives the rent so obviously it is a benefit to us.)

Revenue sharing- the system of disbursing part of federal tax revenues to state and local governments for their use. (This is self explanatory but just so you know the FEDERAL tax revenues would not be shared with VA.)

These can be found at http://dictionary.reference.com/.

Speaking of a "nice try", more "facts" from electricpaul

electricpaul: “Fact #5- The leases will generate income for Virginia. Fact #6- This revenue would lessen the tax burden of the working families of Virginia. Fact #7- Lower personal tax = more disposable income for working families in Virginia. Fact #8- More domestic goods and services being sold will help employers keep people employed. Fact #9- More people employed = fewer people on unemployment/welfare.”
(Note - Facts #6 thru 9 all appear predicated on “Fact #5” being true. Therefore, if #5 isn’t true, then #6-9 are either untrue or irrelevant.)

www.mms.gov: “Q12: Will the leases resulting from the proposed Lease Sale 220 include any revenue-sharing provisions?
A12: Not at this time, any revenue-sharing provision has to be enacted into law through Congressional legislation.”

www.mms.gov/offshore/220/VirginiaFrequentlyAskedQuestions.pdf

dharma....

"With only modest energy needs and no ability of its own to drill, Cuba has negotiated lease agreements with China and other energy-hungry countries to extract resources for themselves and for Cuba." New York Times May 9, 2006. This is what the Times said. Blame them for the wrong info. I don't care which companies they are or which country they live in Cuba has leased the rights to explore. "Another exploration deal was announced between Brazil's state oil company, Petrobras, and Cuba. The deal would allow Petrobras to explore in Cuba's offshore territories in the Gulf of Mexico, with a potential drilling start-date in two years." FactCheck.org June 26, 2008. Like you really have a leg to stand on telling me to fully read something. 9 million barrels in the gulf! LOL! Nice try...

Cuba allowing oil exploration by China off Florida Coast?

electricpaul: “Fact #10- Cuba is allowing oil exploration by China 60 miles off the coast of Florida”

FactCheck.org: “Cuba has allowed for exploration by at least six other non-Chinese firms in the region and onshore testing and exploration by China's Sinopec…A 2006 New York Times article said China was one of the countries that had negotiated an offshore lease. But experts quoted recently by The Associated Press say none of the companies involved are Chinese and all are only allowed to explore for now, not drill in the region.” (6/26/2008)

Perhaps the next time electricpaul cites a source like he did the one above, he will read it a little more closely first.

granted but the government of China...

has never been known to be a benevolent dictatorship and they have far more "influence" with their companies than our government imposes on ours. Regardless of who is exploring/drilling for oil between Florida and Cuba we shouldn't be self imposing restrictions on our American companies and their ability to find/pump/refine oil. The oil wells in the north sea are subjected to far worse weather than we get here. I've been there when I was in the Navy and suffered from the rough seas (35') on the old second fleet flag ship LCC-20. We have to shed the OPEC of it's ability to crush our economy with high crude prices.

EP

Thanks for the welcome, and I did misread your post, but I am fairly certain that China is not exploring, but merely has rights to do so...but the exploration is not conducted by the government but with Chinese companies. And I thought that the present lease with Cuba (which is decades old, right) does not permit anything but exploration...

Proving AM wrong and to be 100% correct...

there is a difference between moratorium and an executive order. A moratorium is an agreed upon waiting period. An executive order is as strong and binding as a law passed by congress and the only way congress can overturn one is with a super majority (2/3) vote. AM! You're back for more enlightenment! First of all glad to see you posting. Second you clearly didn't fully read my post I said "oil exploration". Third nowhere in this thread do I see where you mentioned the Navy anywhere. And I will admit to an error on my part. The USCG report comment was for Dharma. I failed to notice it was a post from you and not her. I think Dharma is a her anyway so no offense is intended if you aren't female Dharma. Dharma and I have been arguing the issue of (amount of) pollution related to Katrina and Rita. Here it is. http://www.uscg.mil/ccs/npfc/docs/PDFs/Reports/osltf_report_hurricanes.pdf

Electricpaul

I have no idea what you are talking about with a USCG incident report, when I stated that it was the NAVY who does not want offshore rigs. And by the way, your factcheck link disproves your claim about China drilling off of the coast of Cuba. You should actually read it. Go ahead, prove me wrong again...

I stand corrected

As pointed out in the comment below, it was indeed Congress's moratorium that lapsed last October. However, Bush had lifted a presidential moratorium on drilling for oil and natural gas on the Outer Continental Shelf just 3 months prior. Now if only electricpaul could be as truthful and accurate with his own "facts" as he is in correcting the mistakes of others.

http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/are_the_chinese_drilling_off_the_coast.html

Stop getting your "info" from...

Michael Moore!

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/09/washington/09drill.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/are_the_chinese_drilling_off_the_coast.html

Maybe you can tell me which AM radio station these play on? LOL! I'm sure you won't read these like you didn't read the USCG report you cited last time we chatted. You were caught being wrong (again) so get over it.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners

special features