Should campaign-related speeches be limited at Norfolk city council meetings?
Yes
65% (360 votes)
No
33% (185 votes)
Not sure
2% (10 votes)
Total votes: 555
Read the story that prompted this poll question: Norfolk considers comment limits at council meetings
- Disclaimer: This is an unscientific sampling of users.




Opinion
If I am a voting as a citizen and I should be able to make as many comments as nescessary under my constitutional rights.
Norfolk City Council
Who here really thinks the city council cares what the citizens think?
political rhetoric
It's up to the city council I suppose, however, it may be hard to keep a politician from weaving political rhetoric into a city policy dissertation. It's just the nature of politics and politicians.
You should hear
You should hear some of the garbage that goes on in Churches throughout this region. Totally disgusting!
READ THE ARTICLE
They are referring to campaign speeches. These tie up the meetings so that no business gets done. I'm all for a limit on this type of grand-standing.
Norfolk
You forgot, "Who cares at Norfolk city council."
I'm shocked...but not really
Step by little step, the city council is becoming more socialistic. You can't legislate morality by fabricating a cultural climate nor controling speech. They should know that the citizens of Norfolk are not being indignant. They are being passionate. There is a culture of "Big Brother" that has been growing steadily in Norfolk, from the shutting down of two Waterside businesses, limitations on how Granby street businesses operate, a draconian age policy at Macarthur Center, among other things...and now this.
Freedom.......Hello?
Why is the government always trying to limit people's freedom? and why are there so many simpletons just standing by and supporting it? As you long you don't harm others or interfere with other people's rights (life, liberty, and property), you should be able to do anything. Aren't we supposed to be a "free" country? Many nations have passed us a long time ago in the freedom index.
Ok
So, define Freedom. Now define Anarchy. Are there any basic differences in your definitions?
Rights and Freedoms
Rights and freedoms are defined and protected by law. Anarchy is the absence of law. Blueneck is correctly refering to freedoms. ANON4242 is incorrectly saying that exercising freedoms are anarchy, or trying to say we should be happy to have a government tell us how to think.