Lawsuit against Virginia Beach detective tossed

Posted to: Crime News Virginia Beach

VIRGINIA BEACH

A judge has thrown out a $200,000 lawsuit against a city detective for wrongful arrest.

Terence J. Darden was arrested in April 2008 and jailed for almost a year without bond, accused of robbing a young man near Green Run Elementary School.

Darden was held until the man who ultimately pleaded guilty to the crime took a polygraph test that cleared him.

That man, Ronald Galloway, said he'd told police from the beginning that Darden was not involved, but prosecutors say he also initially denied knowing Darden or committing the robbery.

Circuit Judge Patricia L. West dismissed the suit last week, which had claimed Detective Thomas M. Bleh was "grossly negligent" in performing the investigation.

"It was the city's contention all along that the allegations in the case did not rise to gross negligence," Assistant City Attorney Natalie P. Mann said.

The case began the night of April 26, 2008, when Darden asked a friend for a ride to 7-Eleven, the lawsuit said.

They drove a red Lexus from his friend's townhome in Green Run to the 7-Eleven on Holland Road.

At 12:12 a.m., Darden bought 50 minutes for his cell phone, then went back to the car, and they returned to his townhouse, according to his suit.

Eight minutes later, the city's 911 center received a call reporting a robbery at Green Run Elementary School, about halfway between Darden's friend's townhome and the 7-Eleven they went to that night.

A young man said he and two others were on the school's athletic fields when a black woman pulled up in a red sedan. He said two black men got out of the car, robbed him of his iPod at gunpoint, and left, according to court documents.

At about 12:45 a.m., a Virginia Beach police officer pulled over the car Darden was in, which was in the area of the robbery and matched the description given by the victim. Other police officers arrived as back-up, including Bleh.

He brought the victim to the scene, who identified Darden as one of the men who had robbed him 45 minutes before. Bleh arrested Darden, and he was held without bond.

The victim also identified the other robber as Galloway, whom the victim knew. Galloway was arrested later for the robbery.

In March 2009, Galloway pleaded guilty, and said during a polygraph test that Darden did not assist him in the robbery.

The prosecutor then dismissed the charges against Darden but reserved the right to bring them back if more evidence surfaces.

"The victim continues to be adamant that Darden was one of the two men who robbed him," according to a statement from Commonwealth's Attorney Harvey Bryant's office.

The statement also says Galloway initially denied knowing Darden and that he claimed he didn't commit the robbery. The only name Galloway has ever given police for his accomplice is "Quan," according to the statement.

In his lawsuit, Darden claimed that Bleh conducted a suggestive line-up, relied on an unreasonable stop of the Lexus that Darden was riding in as part of the investigation, and had failed to get evidence or talk to witnesses that could have provided Darden with an alibi.

City attorneys had argued that Darden's allegations ignore the fact that the detective had a reliable in-person identification of Darden, which alone gave the officer probable cause to arrest Darden.

They also argued that Darden's argument presumes that Bleh had to investigate the case in a certain way and that his investigative actions were not grossly negligent.

Darden's attorney, Robert H. Bennett, said Monday he was not sure if his client would appeal the decision.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Sounds more like it was the victim that put this guy in jail.

How is it all the Police Officers/Detectives fault when it was the VICTIM that positively identified this man as his robber more then once. Do you expect your law enforcement officer to tell you that you don't know who you just saw robbing you. All the officer can do, after the commision of a crime, when he responds is to take statements and descriptions from the victim and witnesses. It's pretty obvious that quite a few of you law abiding citizen have nothing but contempt for our system of justice. Arm chair legal experts with 20/20 hindsight that's what you are. Did ever think, that just maybe, you don't have the whole story and that the decisions that were made were made by people with all the facts? Naw that probably never crossed your mind.

I don't think you're very

I don't think you're very clear on how the system works. Just because you SAY "so-and-so" did something, does NOT automatically mean the police will arrest that person. Trust me on that one. They need some type of other evidence before they can even put out a warrant. The same person burglarized my house twice - caught them in the act both times - and police would not issue a warrant or charge him even though I could positively identify him. It's not as simple as you are trying to make it seem. Also - what happened to a quick and fair trial? Sitting in prison for a year with, apparently, no evidence is not quick or fair. But again - like I said in my initial response to the article, I do believe there HAS to be more to the story than what is presented here.

False arrest

You have been victimized twice; once by the Virginia Beach Police Department and secondly by the jury who said it was ok to have you jailed for a 12 months. You were falsely imprisoned for 12 months. Please pursue this case to the Supreme court because of false imprisonment or being held against your will. No justice, no peace - power to the people! Enforcement of your rights comes from standing up and being counted - vote!

Slam Dunk

This is a clear cut case of being black on a Saturday night.

Dearest Art

I had a black cop in Portsmouth cover up a hit and run involving my car. The person who ran was black. I cannot say the cop would not have broken the law for a person of any color, but break it he did for the black driver who hit me and then fled the scene. I chased the guy home and he tried to hide his car. Even faced with this fact, the cop ignored the evidence.

Was it or was it not racism? Dunno. But I bet if I hit him and the same thing happened with a white cop you would have proclaimed yourself a victim of racism.

There has got to be more.....

Please tell me there is more to this story. The arrest I can understand, being that the man ID'd him, however, it does not explain how or why they kept him locked up for a year???? Something smells funny to me..

VB Courts

The Virginia Beach Court system is a joke and I feel sorry for anyone that is forced to be involved in it.

Especially this judge

If you are a defendent, do not expect a fair trial or unbiased decisions from Patricia West. From the way she runs her bench, it appears she might as well be getting paid by the DA's office.

The fact of the matter remains: An innocent man was jailed for 12 months. Had Detective Behl focused his efforts to get to the truth of this case, instead of channelling his time and efforts with the sole purpose of convicting Darden and ignoring evidence of his innocence, Justice would have been better served. Someone messed up here - who is going to be held accountable, and what will be done to provide some compensation for a man wrongly jailed?

With more to the article now....

Not knowing police procedure, I would say the officer involved executed properly. They had a description of the vehicle, the eye witness was adamant about Darden's involvement. If anyone was profiling, it was the witness. What I don't understand is the right to a speedy trial didn't seem to happen. What is considered speedy? A year? two?

Anyone who thinks race and other factors do not matter....

in the U.S. Judicial System is very, very misinformed or naive.

The amount of time an individual gets for exactly the same crime under exactly the same circumstances varies substantially according to race, the geographic location where the crime was committed (the South hands out longer sentences), the persons economic status and the amount of money stolen (white collar crime).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Crime rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


special features