81°
forecast

Home bakers hope Norfolk will ease regulations

Posted to: Business Consumer - Retail Local Government News Norfolk

NORFOLK

Kerry Achatz hoped to roll dough in her Sherwood Forest home kitchen when she started her bakery business a year and a half ago.

Setting up Lenora Belle Cookies and Cakes, named after her late grandmother, in her home would have saved her lots of money and time, Achatz thought. But when she got ready to launch the business, "not so fast" was the message she got from the city, where zoning laws ban residents from concocting and selling baked goods in their homes.

"I'm just baking cookies, and I couldn't use a home residential oven," she said.

Bakers such as Achatz might soon get the chance to do their entrepreneurial baking at home. The City Council will soon consider a change to its zoning codes that would allow residents to use home kitchens to prepare food for commercial sale.

Planning Director Frank Duke presented the proposal to a council committee last month and plans to bring the revisions before the entire council within 60 days.

Ghent resident Tania Kalupahana said the city's current rules stopped her intentions of selling goods at the Portsmouth Farmer's Market last year.

Officials noticed her home address on food labels and said she couldn't sell there because of Norfolk's rule, Kalupahana said. The owner of a deli where she works allowed her to use the store's kitchen, which had passed inspection.

But all the runaround discouraged Kalupahana from baking her lemon treats and goat-cheese bars, a hobby she had hoped to parlay into a business.

"It's just inconvenient," she said.

The proposal the city is considering would only apply to baking goods, Duke said. Home bakery owners still would not be allowed to host employees, serve clients or conduct sales from their homes.

"The idea is not to have a lot of cars going into our neighborhoods where we'd be turning homes into retail establishments," he said.

Under the proposal, home kitchens would have to pass inspection by the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, as stipulated in a similar exemption in state law. If the kitchen failed inspection, the city health department would have authority to shut it down and the city would then revoke the owner's business license.

The inspection costs $40 annually, on top of license fees. Department spokeswoman Elaine Lidholm said inspectors check for sanitation, temperature control, ingredients lists, and general food-safety precautions in the food-preparation area.

"It has to be enclosed," she said. "It can't just be the kitchen that your kids and the dog run through."

Bev Sell, who runs the Five Points Community Farm Market in Norfolk, said food safety is important and that she and other staffers screen vendors who run their businesses from the market on their preparation procedures.

Sell said she favors the proposal the city is now weighing because current guidelines limit the diversity of products the market can offer. To help its vendors, the market installed a $20,000 hood for its oven.

The market is also where Achatz now operates Lenora Belle Cookies and Cakes. She invested $10,000 in startup costs because of the current rules, she said.

"I had to go out and get a commercial oven," she said, "because now I'm in a commercial establishment."

Achatz said the proposal would help startups but could hurt some business owners whose pricing is affected by higher overhead costs. She charges $2 for each cookie or $20 for a baker's dozen.

"Now," she said, "the people who can go and bake at home in Norfolk can go to the places I still provide my cookies to and say, 'Oh, I can sell you the same cookies for a quarter because I bake them in my home.' "

Cherise M. Newsome,757-446-2794, cherise.newsome@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Mixed issues

I'm all for working at home. However, this sort of thing may involve delvivery vans/trucks, odors (I know everyone likes the smell of baked goods, but maybe not all the time). Trash disposal increases also. These things may very well affect the neighborhood, the very things people move to neighborhoods to get away from.

Mixed issues

I'm all for working at home. However, this sort of thing may involve delvivery vans/trucks, odors (I know everyone likes the smell of baked goods, but maybe not all the time). Trash disposal increases also. These things may very well affect the neighborhood, the very things people move to neighborhoods to get away from.

Mixed issues

I'm all for working at home. However, this sort of thing may involve delvivery vans/trucks, odors (I know everyone likes the smell of baked goods, but maybe not all the time). Trash disposal increases also. These things may very well affect the neighborhood, the very things people move to neighborhoods to get away from.

IMO

Most of these laws are about cronyism, many of these restrictions are the results of special interest lobbying to aimed at reducing competition. With more and more mixed use developments it isn't right that older neighborhoods get stuck with outdated regulations that stifle their ability to become micro-economic engines. Neighborhood based businesses give people places in which they can walk to or ride their bikes and pick up food, flowers, gits, or get the mower repaired, etc. Older neighborhoods that had commercial enterprises find that new owners are shut out due to code provisions that require massive amounts of investment because the old owner wont sell the name which would provide for grandfathering. The result - empty buildings.

More examples of govt.

More examples of govt. overregulation killing the economy.

The age old questions about safety and fairness

Everybody is sure their sanitation and preparation are safe, yet their is still a lot of food borne illness. Cue the anti regulation folks if the city trys to insure the homemade food is safe. Then there is the fairness issue. Business peo9ple who have to pay of commercial property and equipment have to get more from their product than the stuff made in a home kitchen. there is zoning, which came abut to protect the neighborhood. If the home baker is not successful no problem, but if they are successful than traffic and congestion follows. No one ever starts a business hoping to sell a couple dozen cookies a week. The city should be careful as they will get hit by the anti regulation crowd, the business's affected, and the neighborhood.

Norfolk has all kinds of

Norfolk has all kinds of strict and stupid rules that really hurt the small business owner. I have a business, thats a mobile business, and I cant use my home address for it. I have to use an address thats approved by the zoning dept-and it has to be commercial. So I have to pay each month for a storage unit that sits empty, just so I have a business address. Absolutely stupid.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Business rss feed    Consumer - Retail rss feed    Local Government rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


FIND US ON FACEBOOK